You are here

Home » Reader Participation Day: Should The National Park Service Ban Solo Hikers In Grizzly Bear Territory?

Reader Participation Day: Should The National Park Service Ban Solo Hikers In Grizzly Bear Territory?

Share

Published Date

August 29, 2012

Should solo backpackers and hikers be banned in bear country in national parks? USGS photo.

Does the National Park Service have to rethink its rules when it comes to backcountry travel in known grizzly bear habitat? That question grows in importance in the wake of last week's fatal mauling of a backpacker in Denali National Park.

Last year one hiker in Yellowstone National Park was killed by a grizzly, and another man hiking with his wife was fatally mauled in a separate incident. In the case of Denali, last week's fatal mauling was believed to be the first in the park's history. In the Yellowstone incidents, it marked the first known time that there were two fatal maulings in the same year.

National park staff routinely recommend that if you're going into bear country, you go in groups, but it's not a requirement. Should it be?

Story Categories:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Submitted by admin on August 29, 2012 - 9:04am.

How many dangers would you attempt to eliminate? Maybe we should just get rid of all those pesky animals that might hurt one of the visitors?


Submitted by admin on August 29, 2012 - 9:13am.

VISIT PARKS CANADA BEAR AWARE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM (more advanced

than US NPS) http://www.pc.gc.ca/eng/pn-np/mtn/ours-bears/lsv-dyk.aspx

No SOLO Hikers in GRIZZ Habitat, or alternative, CLOSE Grizz Habitat to hikers.

NPS Denali Bias is for the Alaskan hunter & NRA (to please US Congress), so NPS supports

a desire to go kill a GRIZZ merely because the GRIZZ was doing what evolution mandated:

attacking/stalking a threat. All one has to do is study the Science Conflicts at Yellowstone

between fascist superintendents and The Craighead Brother Biologist Team to understand

that NPS management does not truly respect scientific research, and does not want to see

the NPS Culture change from the earlier days when all predators threatened or not were

proudly killed by park hunters/rangers. We see the same lack of respect for wolves when

the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation composed primarily of big game hunters desires to

spend funds on trapping/killing wolves. The human predator is what threatens all wildlife.


Submitted by admin on August 29, 2012 - 9:17am.

Absolutely not. As others have said, total knee-jerk reaction. "Stuff happens" and you cannot regulate the hell out of everything. The word wild is in Wildlife for a reason and people need to realize the risks (along with the many many rewards) of hiking solo (or with a group) in any area (not just the back country!)

I truly hope people "in charge" relax for a second, step back and realize that you just cannot regulate everything to death.


Submitted by admin on August 29, 2012 - 9:27am.

The first fatal mauling in Yellowstone was not a solo hiker. The man was hiking with his wife. Remember?


Submitted by Kurt Repanshek on August 29, 2012 - 9:34am.

Thanks for the recall, anonymous. Corrected in the story.


Submitted by admin on August 29, 2012 - 9:43am.

OMG really?? That's like telling someone with one leg that they can't go hiking either. And two people together can still be stupid. In Arizona we have a stupid motorist law. I really think we should have a stupid hiker law as well. Then maybe people would re-think what they're doing if they have to pay for their own rescue.


Submitted by Kurt Repanshek on August 29, 2012 - 10:12am.

Point of clarification, folks: The NPS is NOT considering or proposing such a ban. We only raised the question here at the Traveler to get your thoughts on the matter.


Submitted by admin on August 29, 2012 - 10:24am.

So far this year, deer mice have killed more people than grizzly bears in the national parks.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.