The Lower Yosemite Fall Trail at Yosemite National Park is a favorite with visitors, but despite warnings from park officials, some tourists just can't resist getting off the trail. The result earlier this month was four consecutive days with 911 calls due to accidents near the footbridge over Yosemite Creek.
There's a good reason this trail is so popular with visitors'the short, easy walk provides what the park website calls "spectacular views of both Upper and Lower Yosemite Falls" during the months the water is flowing. The park staff also has some good advice that they try to disseminate via a variety of methods, including a description of the trail on the park website. It cautions:
"Stay on the paved trail. Above the wooden footbridge that crosses Yosemite Creek, the rocks and boulders are slippery even when dry. Scrambling off-trail in this area has led to serious injuries."
That's good advice, but of course some visitors assume it doesn't apply to them, and on many days you'll find quite a crowd scrambling around on the boulders near the bridge or swimming in the river. That activity resulted in a recent rash of injuries that prompted calls for help to the park's Emergency Communications Center on four days in a row.
On Sunday, August 3, a 45-year-old male was upstream from the footbridge, standing on a rock, when his foot slipped out from under him and he slid down the face of the rock to the ground. As he slid, he struck his head on the rock, and was bleeding behind his left ear.
On Monday, August 4, a 19-year-old female, while scrambling on a slick boulder at the base of Lower Yosemite Fall, slipped and took a five-foot sliding fall off the boulder. She was unable to walk, so she was extricated by a Yosemite Search and Rescue carryout team. She suffered a serious ankle fracture that will require surgical repair and will have an extensive period of recovery.
The following day, August 5, a 14-year-old female lost her grip while scrambling on a boulder, slid headfirst down the rock and injured her left wrist while trying to slow her fall. The victim told emergency responders she was nearly certain she had fractured her wrist; the good news: no fracture was noted on a subsequent x-ray, and she was diagnosed with a severe sprain.
Finally, on Wednesday, August 5, a 45-year-old male slipped and fell while scrambling on uneven terrain not far upstream from the footbridge, spraining his ankle.
After a four day pause, yet another incident occurred in this same area on Sunday, August 10. A 26-year-old male was scrambling on the rocks between the footbridge and the base of the waterfall when he slipped and fell, sustaining a large scalp laceration which required "repair" at the Yosemite Medical Clinic.
The bridge near the falls is close enough to get pretty wet from the spray when the falls are flowing strongly. Photo by Jay Bergesen via Flick and Creative Commons .
Park officials note that "Although it is not illegal to scramble up to the pool, it is strongly discouraged due to the risk of injury and also for the risk to responders of these incidents. While you may see many people doing this during your visit, please remember how truly dangerous it can be and make smart choices."
"Even though it is tempting to leave the trail and scramble to the bases of Yosemite's waterfalls, especially as water levels drop, the boulders at the base of waterfalls are always treacherous. Even when dry, the granite rocks remain surprisingly slick, having been polished smooth by the pounding, falling water most of the year."
Is convincing everyone who visits parks to use good judgment in such situations a lost cause? Based on the above recent examples, that seems to be the case.
A review of this trail on a popular on-line travel site help sums up the difficulty in promoting public safety in locations such as Yosemite:
"Once you reached the Lower Falls, just enjoy the view and take a photo or two from the bridge. Then you walk around the bridge towards the boulder and climb around the obstacle to get close to the water fall...We get very closed to the water fall and had fun getting across the boulder, rocks and people who are coming down. It is fun experience but there is a warning sign that it is "Danger" so be careful and make sure you have a good shoe to walk up and down these boulder which could get slippery when wet."
And a second on-line "reviewer" of this trail notes:
"Most people stay back at the fence area snapping pictures from far away but if you have the inclination to look past the "dangerous to climb" signs you'll be able to really appreciate the beauty of nature."
It's pretty clear that far too many people "have the inclination."
Comments
I think you got that one backwards - but lets not go too far astray.
In my view, the closer we can get the cost to those that use (or might use) the services, the better.
Right.
Isn't that just what I said in my original post? Glad you finally understand.
No. Your suggestion was to create another governmental beaucracy that would continue to place the burden on the general public for those it arbitrarily deemed "unlucky".
Wasn't that what you wanted to do with collecting insurance premiums at park entrance stations? That was what you said before you said you didn't except that you would before you wouldn't. It appears that you may be confusing yourself with your own arguments.
Nope. I wanted it done by a private insurance company. I wanted it fully self funding. And, I wanted those placing themselves at risk paying for S&R expenses.
No new tax payer beaucracy and no "tax" on those not likely to use the service nor on those willing to self insure.
Lee...
Of course he's wrong. Fighting insurance companies to cover the injuries of my patients that were due to be covered was one of the situations that infuriated me as a nurse. Grisham's novel/movie The Rainmaker was far from fiction. Some Wall Street folks put much more faith in insurance companies than real life experience would warrant.
I could support requiring SAR insurance for those visitors participating in high risk activities.
But what concerns me is how much of the expense the unforutunate individual or insurance company should pay. The NPS and other government agencies have the ability to spend large amounts of money on SAR, often times beyond what might be warranted. There needs to be a review system in place to decide what is appropriate.
Rick,
I put my faith in the Constitution and its judicial system. If an injury is actually covered, the insurance company will pay. The overwhelming majority of claims are paid with no dispute. There may be disputes as to whether the coverage actually applies. That is where our judicial system comes into play. If the courts determine the coverage applies, the insurance company will pay.