NPS Director Jon Jarvis has been reprimanded for ignoring Interior Department ethics rules/NPS
An investigation has found that National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis intentionally skirted the Interior Department's Ethics Office to write a book, a Guidebook to American Values and Our National Parks, for a cooperating association contractually tied to the Park Service, an action that brought the director an official reprimand from top Interior Department officials, who also removed him from any dealings with the Park Service's ethics office for the rest of his career as director.
Furthermore, Deputy Interior Secretary Michael Connor ordered Director Jarvis to receive monthly ethics training for the rest of his tenure.
"I am also concerned about the attitude the (investigation) demonstrates Director Jarvis exhibited toward important Departmental institutions such as the Ethics Office, the Office of the Solicitor, and the Office of the Secretary," Deputy Secretary Connor wrote in a letter (attached below) to Mary L. Kendall, deputy inspector general for the department.
In a short statement Thursday evening the director said, "I regret that I did not seek guidance on the most appropriate path forward to publish this book. I wrote the book to inspire and engage more Americans in our national parks, particularly during the National Park Service's centennial year. I consider it a good lesson learned and will ask for guidance if and when similar situations arise in the future."
Interior's Office of Inspector General began looking into the matter last June after being alerted to the book published by Eastern National, a cooperating association that has been working with national parks for 50 years At issue was "whether Jarvis used his public office for private gain by seeking a book deal with Eastern National and whether he misused any U.S. Government resources in the process."
Ethics Office guidelines specifically state that government employees who want to do outside work with any business or organization seeking to do business with the Interior Department must first gain approval from the Ethics Office, regardless of whether there's payment involved. Additionally, an attorney in the Ethics Office said "that even if Jarvis was not personally receiving money from the sale of the book, having his name associated with it could create the appearance that he was using his official position for personal gain."
The investigation also showed that Director Jarvis approached Eastern National with the idea, but that he had told Interior Secretary Jewell that Eastern National had asked him to write the book. It also showed that Eastern National Chief Executive Officer George Minnucci, after discussing the project on the phone with the director, later wrote him an email worded as if the idea was his. In his interview with OIG staff, Mr. Minnucci said Director Jarvis had not asked him to word his email in such a way, but rather he did so because "he wanted his staff to think the book was his idea and that it was 'a CEO decision.'”
The OIG report (attached below) stated that Director Jarvis said he "did not consult with the Ethics Office on the book because doing so would have taken too long, and with NPS’ centennial approaching, the book would be 'really powerful.'”
"Jarvis explained that he was frustrated with the Ethics Office for not being able to approve 'very, very simple things,'" the report stated. "As an example, he explained that a thank-you letter to a donor from him and the Foundation took 6 weeks for the office to approve, which led him to believe that approving the book was going to be a problem."
In one interview with investigators, Director Jarvis said he wasn't afraid of taking chances, such as failing to clear the project with the Ethics Office.
I think I knew going into this there was a certain amount of risk. I’ve never been afraid of a risk. . . . I’ve gotten my ass in trouble many, many, many times in the Park Service by . . . not necessarily getting permission . . . I’ve always pushed the envelope. . . . And I felt that this values analysis . . . could be a very, very powerful tool to not only connect to the next generation but to resonate across political spectrums.
“And from my view, from my experience, in the ethics world, having been an SES [Senior Executive Service employee] for almost a decade, I did not feel like I was violating any ethics issues because I set this up [with] no personal benefit, nothing gained for me personally," he continued. "What I was trying to prevent is having it edited."
While Director Jarvis did not seek to be paid for the book, and directed that any royalties go to the National Park Foundation, there was concern among some Interior officials that he retained the copyright to the title and allowed the use of the Park Service arrowhead logo on the cover and his title as Park Service director in places, "giving the appearance of Government endorsement."
In the end, it doesn't appear as if there will be any royalties for anyone. Eastern National officials told OIG investigators that while it had cost them $11,000-$12,000 to print the $7.95 book, they had only sold a little more than 200 copies and they didn't expect to make their investment back.
The investigation determined that Director Jarvis used his government iPad to write the manuscript; while he claimed to have worked on it outside office hours, the investigation determined that "it appears" there were at least nine occasions when Director Jarvis worked on it or corresponded with Eastern National officials concerning the book "on weekdays when he was not on leave and Government offices were open."
Comments
You're painting a whole lot of people with an awfully large brush in those accusations. It's pretty hard to live up to your responsibilities when the mechanisms necessary to do so have been purchased by a powerful and corrupt few.
I HOPE trail is right in thinking we may be making progress, but it's sure hard to see if that's right or not. To me, it looks like we're devolving even further.
Thank goodness we can still go to a park and find at least a semblance of sanity. (If you can find a place to park.)
when the mechanisms necessary to do so have been purchased by a powerful and corrupt few.
Have they "purchased" your vote? No, because you are informed (even if misguided ;)) But so many people aren't informed. You however, don't stick to your convictions. As much as you rail against big oil, the coal industry and big business you still drive a car, heat your home and patronize "big business". And as much as you rail against the government - you still want it bigger. The mechanisms haven't been purchased, they have been forfeited.
If this, most recent Jarvis scandal, isn't evidence of a culture of arrogance and abuse of power. Then nothing is. I have dealt with his superintendents and they carry the Jarvis banner well. If someone disagrees with the NPS, they can expect ad hominem attacks from government employees currying favor from someone they obviously fear. When dealing with someone as arrogant as Jarvis who openly says he takes risks and skirts the rules, who wouldn't, under his employ, be afraid?
kudos to Director Jarvis. I liked him befote, all the more after reading this. In deciding to ask forgiveness rather than permission to publish (FOR NO PERSONAL GAIN) a commentary on the values underpinning our national parks he establishes himself as a public servant more interested in the mission than his own personal well being (he knew he would get slammed for this).
while I don't want to undercut the authority of IGs nor the importance of ethics for senior public officials--this case is a testament to his heroism rather than malfeasance. At a time when everyone from ranchers trying to secure sweetheart deals or hunt park wildlife to armed right wingers are taking over wildlife sanctuaries and allowed to threaten federal officials and the public for 40 days without federal intervention, we need defenders of our public lands like Jarvis.
The State Department has a "crisis of conscience" award for employees who put their own careers at risk violating regulations and policies in order to serve a greater good. Interior should adopt a similar award with Jarvis its first recipient.
Thank you John for your committed service to our national parks.
Why does this guy still have a job?
Hey, at least he didn't set up his own email server. This is a really minor transgression. BFD.
In the last 3 years of visiting national Parks people push me off the walk trail this happening in America rural countries sites'
there are some hate ground in unform -alike wolf in sheep skin
It is no wonder our NPS leaders believe they can get away with anything. Director Jarvis is indeed with good intent in writing a book. However, at his level, he should be aware of ethics viololations and held accountable. I am extremely disappointed that the Director was given a simple "reprimanded" by having to take ethics courses. If this were a lower-leveled employee, no matter how good the intent, that employee would have probably received harsher penalties. The DOI handbook of charges and penalties shows guidance for 1 day suspension to removal for the first offense of an ethics violation. Douglas Factor #2 states, "It is a well-recognized principle that a supervisor occupies a position of trust and responsibility and is held to a higher standard of conduct than non-supervisory employees." This is example shows employees that accountability is not important in the DOI and NPS.