You are here

Home » More Opposition to Crater Lake Fee Hike

More Opposition to Crater Lake Fee Hike

Share

Published Date

January 11, 2007

    Another voice is calling on Washington to drop plans for a doubling in the entrance fee to Crater Lake National Park. Last week came word of U.S. Representative Peter DeFazio's opposition to the jumping of the fee from $10 to $20.
    Now fellow Congressman Greg Walden has joined DeFazio, saying he thinks "doubling the fee is going way too far."
    The news story that carried Walden's comments noted that Crater Lake Superintendent Chuck Lundy says the added revenues would go to help improve visitor facilities and services throughout the park.
    Isn't that what Congress provides the NPS a budget for?
    According to the story, a 90-day public comment period on the fee increase runs through the end of March. If approved, the higher fee takes effect next January.

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Submitted by admin on January 11, 2007 - 10:34pm.
Yes, that is what the "NPS budget" is for, but we also have other national priorities (securing our borders, winning the War on Terror) in addition to maintaining our parks. Besides, ya know where most of the NPS budget is spent?...try too many scientists making $$$$$$$ instead of rangers making $$. Maybe you oughta do a little investigating on that, and report back to us in a column...like what % of the NPS budget is scientist salaries.... Anyway, the stuffed-shirt politicians need to refrain from micro-managing our parks...it's the superintendent's job to do what he/she feels necessary to manage their resource. I'll bet ya that those who visit Crater on a regular basis will do what they should do anyway...BUY AN ANNUAL PASS...to do otherwise is not being all that smart anyway...and those people oughta get hit in the head with a Vonage box. :-) Hoo-hoo, hoo-hoo-hoo! Those on vacation will buy an ATB pass since they are probably visiting many parks in addition to Crater.

Submitted by admin on January 12, 2007 - 6:39am.
Historically, the science budget in the national parks has been anemic. I don't know how much that's changed in the past 20 years, but I recently read Alston Chase's book criticizing the NPS on Yellowstone, and the numbers are staggering in suggesting the parks have always spent much more money on law enforcement than on science and that the scientific program has largely been based on enforcement concerns.

Submitted by admin on January 12, 2007 - 8:46am.
From my experience, it seems most NPS dollars go to administrative salaries and road repairs. Resource management salaries, or "scientist" salaries, are a small portion of park budgets. And they are considered rangers and often wear the same uniform as law enforcement and interpretation.

Submitted by admin on January 12, 2007 - 9:17am.
Ranger X, that's right. That scientists are rangers is another one of Chase's criticisms. It didn't always used to be that way; I think the re-organization goes back to the 1960s. All of it can be very confusing to keep straight for me, especially given the complexities of the law.

Submitted by admin on January 13, 2007 - 2:08pm.
A lot has changed regarding resource management in the NPS since Chase wrote his book. While the agency still isn't where it needs to be, the "Natural Resource Challenge" which former Director Bob Stanton instituted after the publication of Dick Sellars' outstanding "Protecting Nature in the National Parks" (itself written in partial response to Chase) has resulted in about $80 million of NEW recurring funding for natural resources in the NPS each year starting in 1999. Hundreds of new natural resource managers have been hired and the Service's Inventory and Monitoring program, which provides "vital signs" information to park managers, has really taken off. So while rangers today still do some resource management, most resource managers today are well-trained professionals, many with advanced degrees in biology or another science. Unfortunately. despite those budget increases, most of the directives from Washington in the recent years of park operational budget squeezes have regressed again towards emphasizing the visitor services ("enjoyment" in the Organic Act) side of the mission and been silent on the "conserve unimpaired" side of the mission, which the courts have repeatedly said is paramount. Most parks are hard pressed to adequately monitor the condition of their resources, no less to maintain or restore ecological integrity when needed. JLongstreet an NPS Superintendent

Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.