By Matthew Schwartz
The recent article on
the National Park Service's decision to re-open off-road vehicle trails
in the Bear Island section of Big Cypress provides a good discussion.
However, no matter how important the panther is to the story, it is far
from the only objection the environmental community has to this poorly
thought-out decision.
According to the terms of the July 2000
Off-Road Vehicle Management Plan (which regulates ORV use within the
preserve), most of these lands were deemed off limits to ORVs even
without the presence of panthers. Far from being "dry and forested,"
much of the newly opened area consists of vast tracts of low-lying, wet
prairie, inundated for most of the year.
Prairies are
identified by the management plan as the "vegetation community most
affected by ORV use." The plan goes on to list effects such as the loss
of vegetation, exposure of underlying soils, rutting, compaction and
the very likely spread of invasive plant species. Dispersed use due to
a lack of natural obstacles is also cited. As stated in the September
2000 Record of Decision, "Environmentally sensitive areas, such as
prairies, will be closed to ORV use."
Another objection to this
decision relates to the length of the trails. While the management plan
calls for approximately 30 miles of ORV trails in Bear Island, the new
alignment provides for more than 34 miles of designated trails plus an
additional seven miles of "secondary" trails. Although secondary trails
are permitted by the ORV management plan, they are required to have a
specific destination such as a campsite. In Bear Island, the only
destination given by the NPS for the re-opened secondary trails is that
they provide access to a "hunting area." This is not consistent with
either the letter or the spirit of the management plan.
In 2006,
the Department of the Interior released its new guidelines for the
National Park Service. One of the key management principles was to
"ensure that conservation will be predominant when there is a conflict
between the protection of resources and their use." This is echoed by
the NPS' own "precautionary principle" -- "in all situations involving
conflicts between resource protection and resource use, the National
Park Service would decide in favor of resource protection."
In
addition to the endangered Florida panther, Big Cypress National
Preserve is home to no less than 29 other animals listed as threatened,
endangered or species of special concern. These include mammals, birds,
fish, reptiles and a mollusk. Many of these are also affected by ORV
travel. The University of Florida is conducting research on the effects
of ORVs on amphibians and small mammals in Big Cypress prairies.
Plant life is equally diverse: Of the more than 850 species found in
the preserve, 72 are listed by the state of Florida as threatened or
endangered.
Perhaps more than any of its other qualities, Big
Cypress is defined by this explosion of biodiversity. Proper use and
enjoyment are, of course, expected and encouraged in any unit of the
National Park Service. However, use and enjoyment should never extend
to activities which have been shown to damage or are likely to damage
natural resources. In a recent National Geographic special issue on "Our National Parks in Peril," an aerial photo of Big Cypress
received a two-page spread. The caption? "Scarface."
We who live
in Broward County are fortunate to have this national treasure in our
backyard. I and others often lead hiking trips into remote sections of
the preserve only about an hour from Fort Lauderdale. Wet feet, the
only drawback, are a small price to pay to experience the natural
beauty and tranquility of South Florida as it once was.
As a
unit of our National Park System, Big Cypress is the property of all
Americans and few of the nearly 450,000 annual visitors to the preserve
do so for the purpose of ORV travel. In the context of the current
controversy, it is worth repeating the mission statement of the NPS
here: "to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and
the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in
such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the
enjoyment of future generations."
Matthew Schwartz is the political chairman of the Sierra Club of Broward County, Florida.
Add comment