You are here

Reader Participation Day: California, or Utah, For A National Park Trek?

Share

Published Date

July 21, 2010

Utah, or California, which state beckons you for a national park tour? Top photo of Arches National Park by Kurt Repanshek, bottom photo of Half Dome by QT Luong, www.terragalleria.com/parks, used with permission.

If you had the option of either traveling to Utah for a swing through its national parks, or to California to sample its national parks, which would you choose?

True, California has Yosemite and Sequoia and Lassen Volcanic and Redwood just to name four, and overall more national parks than Utah. But Utah has Arches and Canyonlands and Zion, wonders that frame a red-rock landscape like none other in the world.

To help you decide, here's a breakdown of the national parks (just parks, not seashores, monuments, preserves, etc.) in those states:

California

Yosemite National Park
Sequoia National Park
Kings Canyon National Park
Death Valley National Park
Lassen Volcanic National Park
Channel Islands National Park
Joshua Tree National Park

Utah

Arches National Park
Bryce Canyon National Park
Canyonlands National Park
Capitol Reef National Park
Zion National Park

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

I have a CA trip on my bucket list. I must say I have done several trips to Utah and it does make for a great road trip.At Zion the narrows is a great hike I also would suggest North Rim of the Grand Canyon as a side trip from Zion or Bryce. North rim has less people than the south rim But is closed part of the year so plan ahead. I also Loved Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument was an incredible drive from Capital Reef down to Bryce.
Dave


Have been to both states. Lassen,Yosemite,Sequoia,Kings Canyon,Red Woods.Also several of the areas in San Francisco.

In Utah it's Bryce,Zion,Canyonlands,Arches,Capital Reef,Cedar Breaks,Natural Bridges. And add Dead Horse Sate Park.

My vote is Utah. I love em all.........

Can't wait to retire to began those monthly trips to HOPEFULLY all of the National Parks.


RangerLady:
y_p_w, be careful with that. It is actualyl illegal to transfer alcohol into Utah from another state. I really doubt anyone enforces it since all of us here at Capitol Reef do it, but you never know when someone might be having a bad day and will want to cite!

I wasn't aware of that, and I even checked out the Utah alcohol control website before I went. I just looked around some more, and apparently that is technically the case that bringing in alcohol is usually illegal. There are some exceptions, but they seemed obscure (like inheriting alcoholic beverages from an estate) and which also required a license and/or fee. The other one is bringing in less than 2 liters of liquor if completing an international flight; I think this is the federal duty-free limit which Utah probably doesn't want to mess with.

I'm thinking one of the primary points would be right at Page, Arizona, where they've got a WalMart SuperCenter that has an extensive collection of beer, and I think liquor. I mean - you've got people going boating in Lake Powell, with Page a popular supply point, and then crossing into Utah via roads or waterways. Still - law enforcement at Glen Canyon NRA is NPS, and I don't imagine they're citing people for merely having alcohol without being severely intoxicated and/or controlling a boat when drinking.


y_p_w,

The issue with the law is that if you didn't buy it in Utah then you didn't pay UT taxes on it. UT really wants you to pay their state taxes on the alcohol before you cross state lines with it. The rangers here checked into that and no one can tell them how to pay those taxes, so every one pretty much turns a blind eye to it. We all do it when we head into Grand Junction, CO for groceries and bring back wine and other goodies.


Actually, I think if you check laws in most states you'll find it's illegal to import not only liquor but virtually anything else as well. It's probably one of those "just in case" laws used to nail people who transport huge quantities of things to avoid higher taxes in one state. Try buying a car in one state and see if they nail you for taxes at home when you try to get license plates.

A few years ago, if you lived in Utah but worked in Arizona, Arizona required that you have both Utah and Arizona license plates on your car. I hope that has changed, but at the time the Arizona legislature didn't like Utah for some reason. Maybe because they were jealous of Utah's scenery.


I found the exceptions:

http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE32A/htm/32A12_021200.htm

2 liters if purchased outside of the US and that has passed through US customs is the first category. Moving to Utah seems to be another, but apparently with state approval and fees. Then there's up to 2 liters of 288 oz of beer if purchased on a military base (who thought that up?).

Apparently the Utah Highway Patrol is sending officers outside the state to look for people with Utah plates and buying beer around major holidays. They do this from unmarked cars with different plates. It doesn't seem like they're targeting out of state drivers though. One piece of advice in their comments section was to not stop at the first place across the border, since that's where these undercover stings are typically set up. One lawyer says this is primarily for revenue purposes as you suggested.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home/49869570-76/fireworks-utah-reynolds-be...


I'm from California, but I keep returning to visit the parks of Utah.


Utah has no beaches? How about Lake Powell and the Glen Canyon NRA. My first visit to Yosemite was this spring and it was incredibly beautiful, but Utah gets my vote.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.