You are here

Man Killed By Grizzly In Yellowstone National Park Identified, Board of Review To Be Convened

Share

Published Date

July 7, 2011

Yellowstone National Park officials on Thursday identified the victim of a grizzly bear attack as a 57-year-old Torrence, California, man, and adjusted some of the details of the attack.

Brian Matayoshi was killed in Wednesday morning's attack, while his wife, Marylyn, was briefly picked up by the bear but did not require medical attention, park officials said. The attack occurred about 11 a.m. as the couple was hiking along the Wapiti Lake Trail, which is located off the South Rim Drive south of Canyon Village and east of the park’s Grand Loop Road.

The couple was returning to the trailhead toward their vehicle when, about a mile-and-a-half from the trailhead, came out of the lodgepole pine forest and into a meadow, a park briefing of the incident said.

"It appears that the couple spotted a bear approximately 100 yards away and then began walking away from the bear.  When they turned around to look, they reportedly saw the female grizzly running down the trail at them," the release said. "The couple began running, but the bear caught up with them, attacking Mr. Matayoshi. The bear then went over to Mrs. Matayoshi, who had fallen to the ground nearby. The bear bit her daypack, lifting her from the ground and then dropping her. She remained still and the bear left the area.

"Mrs. Matayoshi then walked back toward the meadow and attempted, without success, to call 911 on her cell phone. She began to shout for help and was heard by a distant group of hikers who were able to contact 911 by cell phone. Two rangers already in the area on backcountry patrol were contacted by the park Communications Center by radio and responded to the scene of the incident."

Mr. Matayoshi had died from "multiple bite and clawing injuries" by the time rangers arrived at the scene at approximately 11:30 a.m., the park statement said. The couple was not carrying any pepper spray, according to park officials.

Rangers immediately closed hiking trails in the area, and a helicopter patrol was used to determine whether there were any other hikers already in the backcountry in that area. None were spotted, and park officials closed the area for the coming days.

"The initial investigation suggests the sow grizzly acted in a purely defensive nature to protect her cubs," the statement said. "This female bear is not tagged or collared, and does not apparently have a history of aggression or human interaction.  Typically, the National Park Service does not trap, relocate, or kill a bear under those circumstances.  A Board of Review, which will include interagency experts, will be convened to review the incident."

The last fatal bear attack in Yellowstone occurred in October 1986 when a 38-year-old photographer, William Tesinsky, was attacked while "stalking" a grizzly in the Otter Creek area of the Hayden Valley, according to park officials who investigated the incident. The Montana man got too close to his subject, former Yellowstone Chief Ranger Dan Sholly wrote in his memoirs from the park, recounting that "before he could even press the shutter release" to snap a shot the bear charged him, mauled him, and partially consumed him.

Previous to that incident, a Swedish woman, Brigitta Fredenhagen, was killed in July 1984 by a grizzly that pulled her out of her tent at a backcountry campsite in the middle of the night. Rangers had warned her about hiking alone in the backcountry, according to Mr. Sholly's account in Guardians of Yellowstone, An Intimate Look at the Challenges of Protecting America's Foremost Wilderness Park.

Despite the large number of visitors who travel to Yellowstone each year, and the hundreds of bears in the region, there are relatively few bear-human incidents, said Mr. Nash. During the past 30 years there has been less than one injury per 1 million visitors to Yellowstone, while back in the 1930s there were roughly 175 injuries per 1 million visitors, he said.

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Ranger Lady, initial reports from the park did mention that they kept walking after seeing the bear(s). Later accounts corrected that and said they headed away from the bear.

But this incident, and the one last year in Olympic where the man was killed by a mountain goat, raises the question of whether enough information is being given to visitors of parks where the backcountry is readily accessible and is the home territory of these animals?

After all, when you plan a backcountry trip and reserve backcountry campsites, you often have to sit through a backcountry briefing on the animals you might encounter and how to deal with them. In parks like Yellowstone, Glacier, and Olympic, the "backcountry" is not miles away from your car, but often a few short yards. Is there a need for a more hands-on education of casual tourists who might want to take a day hike?

Tough question.


Tough Circumstances. How far do you go to protect one from harm resulting from their own actions. The thought comes to mind that many folks get insulted if you insinuate that they may not know enough about what they are doing. How much information can you force on them and how many restrictions can you place on them. Wonderful thing when people ask "Is there anything else I need to know to keep out of trouble." Not saying they didn't do this. I'm not sure what the answer is to this one other than, let it be. Otherwise it will be debated to death with no benefitial result. Sometimes the only hope that comes to my mind is that God must have had a reason. My thoughts are with the family.

Ron (obxguys)


My husband has hiked countless miles in the backcountry with his brothers and our son. The two of us hike many miles every summer on day hikes. Each and every time we hike, we do so with bear spray and we take precautions. We are taking a risk but we do so willingly and it is an informed risk. We could just as easily fall off a mountain or fall down the mountain, as we could have a grizzly encounter. I agree with Rick, hikers bare a personal responsibility when they are outdoors. It's not enough to stay on trails or follow regulations. Hiking responsibly also takes into account the animals whose habitats we enter. Had this Grizzly gotten sprayed with pepper spray she would have learned that people should be avoided and in all likelihood avoided them in the future. In my personal opinion, I think that's a lesson that can be taught as opposed to blasting away at bears with a gun.

 Like I said earlier, life is full of risks unless you plan to stay at home and get your fill of nature on the National Geographic channel.


Obviously not to "near extinction". Besides that was a long time ago. Back then they had bounties on just about anything that had canines. Conservation and wildlife management practices today have changed dramatically for the better. And yes I do believe they need a little "refresher" on the true pecking order.


I don't think pepper spray is the answer. It may or may not save you on that one probably rare occasion your attacked. Just like carrying a gun and "blasting away" as you say, may or may not save you on that one rare occasion. Although I would rather have pepper spray than nothing at all. And to be honest I'm still not sure which I would rather carry, pepper spray or a gun if given the choice. Last year when I was in Yellowstone I carried nothing.
 How many bears are actually sprayed every year in the U.S.? No one knows for sure. But I'll bet you could count them on one hand. Not much of a deterrent in my opinion. You are surely not going to educate many bears by spraying them. If you want to teach a whole population of bears to respect humans you need to hunt them. Organized, managed and on a seasonal basis. Trust me, all animals are smarter than most people give them credit for. They will learn quickly.
 BTW, Hunting and "blasting away with a gun" are two totally different concepts and have absolutely nothing in common.


I guess that's the beauty of living in America, we get to agree to disagree.


One of the many, Connie.


beauties......that is.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.