Editor's note: This updates that the suspect confirmed dead in the park and provides additional details, including his name.
An Iraqi war veteran wanted in connection with the slaying of a ranger in Mount Rainier National Park was found dead Monday afternoon in a drainage near one of the park's hallmark waterfalls just south of Paradise.
How Benjamin Colton Barnes died, however, was not immediately known. While ground teams had reached the location of his body, they had not reported whether he had died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, from hyopthermia, or perhaps from a fall, park spokeswoman Lee Snook said.
Mr. Barnes had been the subject of a manhunt that grew to involve more than 200 law enforcement personnel from state, local and federal jurisdictions after Ranger Margaret Anderson was shot New Year's Day. At times he waded through chest-deep snow to evade the search teams, Ms. Snook said.
“The last time his tracks were found the snow was about chest deep, so it would have been cold, wet and difficult," she said. The tracks indicated that he was "post-holing" and had no snowshoes, the spokeswoman said.
Earlier Monday, park officials said aerial teams had spotted Mr. Barnes' prone body in a steep drainage near Narda Falls, a 176-foot cascade of the Paradise River that plunges over a basalt wall in two pitches, one falling about 159 feet, the other about 17.
Ranger Anderson, a 34-year-old law enforcement ranger, was shot and killed when she tried to intercept Mr. Barnes' car as it fled a routine checkpoint where park visitors were checked to see if they had chains for their tires. At a point on the road above Longmire and about a mile from Paradise the ranger used her cruiser to block the road so she could stop the man shortly after 10 a.m. Sunday.
"The assailant jumped from his car and opened fire with a shotgun, fatally wounding Ranger Anderson. The assailant then fled on foot into the woods," another park spokeswoman, Lee Taylor, said Sunday evening.

Ranger Margaret Anderson. NPS photo.
When other rangers responded to the scene, they were prevented from reaching Ranger Anderson by the man, who kept them pinned down with gunfire from the woods, according to other park officials.
"It was about 90 minutes before they could reach her," Ms. Snook said Sunday afternoon.
The ranger, who became just the ninth ranger in Park Service history to be murdered in the line of duty, left behind a husband who also was a ranger in the park, and two young children, aged 2 and 4, according to park officials.
The more than 200 law enforcement personnel from the park, the FBI, and surrounding jurisdictions continued their manhunt into Sunday night, aided by a fixed-wing aircraft with forward-looking infrared to scan the ground, she said.
At Paradise, 125 park visitors who had come to Paradise to enjoy the day were moved for their safety into the Jackson Memorial Visitor Center along with 17 park staff.
"The visitor center has a restaurant to provide food, restrooms, and water, and law enforcement officers are on hand to provide protection," said Ms. Taylor.
Later Sunday evening they were escorted by authorities out of the park.
News reports out of Seattle said the man being sought was thought to have been involved in a shooting at a house there earlier Sunday, and that when authorities searched a car abandoned near Ranger Anderson they found it held survival gear and body armor.
In Washington, D.C., Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Sunday that he was "deeply saddened by the tragic, horrific and cowardly murder today at Mount Rainier National Park."
"The Department of the Interior and the National Park Service will do everything possible to bring the perpetrator of this crime to justice and to ensure the safety of park visitors and other park rangers," the secretary said in a prepared statement. "This tragedy serves as a reminder of the risks undertaken by the men and women of the National Park Service and law enforcement officers across the Department every day, and we thank them for their service. My thoughts and prayers are with Margaret's family in this difficult time."
Park Service Director Jon Jarvis called the ranger's murder "a heartbreaking, senseless tragedy."
"Margaret was just 34 years old. She and her husband Eric, who is also a Park Ranger at Mount Rainier, have two young children," he added. "Margaret was killed while doing her job: protecting the visiting public on one of the park’s busiest days of the year."
Over the years more than 200 Park Service staff have died or been killed on the job. Kris Eggle, a ranger at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, was shot and killed in the line of duty in 2002 while pursuing suspected drug runners who were armed with AK-47s.
Comments
Bruce - thats what I figured. Ignore the 2nd amendment. Prevent citizens from protecting themselves. Works real well in dictatorships.
Good luck waiting for the military or law enforcement to protect you when those crazies and criminals bust through your door. Perhaps you can ask them to wait until the police come.
What do you think would have happened to this women if guns were banned?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/mom-calls-9-1-1-asking-for-permission-to...
No, ec, the Constitution is not obscene, but sometimes its interpretation is. Why do we completely forget half of the Second Amendment? Guns are not obscene. But allowing people to possess weaponry that goes far beyond reasonable is. See those high-capacity clips in the photo?
Many court decisions besides gun rulings are also questionable. Citizens United is a prime example.
In Utah, anyone may go to a gun show and purchase anything without having to submit to a background check. Is that how we support a "well regulated militia?" And when I read an article by NRA's Wayne LaPierre in which he outright calls for "armed rebellion" when the "government tries to rescind our divine right" to possess firearms of all kinds, I find it very alarming. The lack of any kind of rational control of weapons is what's obscene.
Here's a good write-up regarding LaPierre and the NRA.
http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2011/09/27/the-flat-out-paranoia-o...
I'm not a fan of the rider that allowed guns on NPS land. That it was inserted into a credit card reform bill was rather appalling to me.
That being said, I'm not sure anything would have happened that much differently save the timing of when things happen and the response time to the incident depending on where the LE rangers are when they get the call. I'm guessing that he didn't have any weapons visible when he passed through the entrance station, and probably retrieved then from his trunk to prepare to blow by the chain checkpoint and prepare for any resistance. If any weapons were visible, I'm not sure that an unarmed ranger (although sometimes it's an armed LE ranger) is going to be able to do much. It's always been legal to have weapons in national parks that are unloaded in the trunk. Now the cache that he had might arouse suspicions if seen, but I've never seen a request to open a car trunk at an entrance station.
There may be state law stating that driving with a loaded weapon in the passenger compartment is illegal in Washington. I don't know what Washington's law would be.
"but sometimes its interpretation is."
There is nothing to intepret. The 2nd ammendment says the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The statement is absolute - it doesn't say "only if the citizen is in the militia" or "subject to the regulation of the militia" it says "shall not be infringed". The lead in clause is irrelevant. At the time of the writing of the 2nd amendment, citizens owned guns and when the need arose, formed a militia and used their own guns (the most powerful available at the time). Noone was telling them what or how many guns they could own or how they could procure them.
An no, I don't have a problem with no background check because anyone that wants a gun to use for illegal purposes would get one without going through the "legal" process.
Off topic - I beleive you would the one that suggested that subsidizing the Chevy Volt would create jobs. There goes that theory.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/after-receiving-bailout-gm-may-move-volt...
EC, I think it could be argued that, in light of the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision on the Heller case, that there is a lot to be interpreted in the 2nd Amendment.
Indeed, according to the following article from the Washington Post, more clarity in that ruling is being sought.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cases-lining-up-to-ask-supreme-co...
Sorry Kurt, - that isn't interpretation - that is Judicial activism ignoring what the constitution says. Supreme Court rulings have struck down laws restricting gun ownership. Both Heller and McDonald ruled that way.
I think when 4 justices disagree with the interpretation of the other 5, the matter is not as clean cut as it would be with a 9-0 decision...some might argue that some or all of the 5 were practicing judicial activism.
But I'm not trying to debate the 2nd Amendment here, just pointing out the obvious that interpretation can at times be in eye of the beholder.