You are here

Weather Helping Firefighters In Rocky Mountain National Park

Share

Published Date

December 3, 2012

Weather, which has hampered firefighters battling a wildfire in Rocky Mountain National Park, seemed to turn into an ally Monday as cooler temperatures and lighter winds settled over the fire.

While a private cabin in Moraine Park within the park boundaries was lost to the Fern Lake Fire, officials said high winds Sunday and into Monday did not push the fire any closer to the park's eastern gateway town of Estes Park, Colorado.

Roughly 150 firefighters and 18 engines stayed on the fire through the night, and as dawn arrived the total was expected to grow by 100 personnel with more resources en route to the park.

Spot fires continue to burn in the Steep Mountain area through the night and crews were working to keep it from moving further to the south. Structure protection crews were still stationed along Bear Lake Road to try to keep the fire within the park.

Monday's weather forecast called for temperatures in the mid-30s to low 40s and lighter winds, with calm winds expected after sundown.

The fire was mapped at approximately 4,400 acres, with roughly 20 percent of the footprint contained, officials said.

The priorities of fire managers continued to be firefighter and public safety, incident stabilization, and control of the fire perimeter to keep it from spreading beyond the park boundaries so residents may be allowed to re-enter when it is safe for them to do so. Smoke from the fire has been impacting the area, especially during the evening hours.

The east side of Rocky Mountain National Park via Beaver Meadows Entrance and Fall River Entrance is closed, although Fall River Visitor Center remains open.

Residents should be aware that pre-evacuation and evacuation notices could be expanded. No changes in evacuation or pre-evacuation orders had been made since Saturday. Park officials said Monday morning that only individuals with a medical necessity were being allowed to re-enter the evacuation area of the Highway 66 corridor with an escort from the sheriff's office. The Highway 66 corridor, including all adjacent streets, remains closed. Electrical power was reportedly still on in the area.

Residents of Marys Lake Road from Moraine Avenue and Rock Ridge Road south to Highway 7 and Fish Creek Road were to in pre-evacuation status. Pre-evacuation means that residents should be ready to leave if they receive an evacuation notice.

Residents of High Drive and adjacent streets are also on pre-evacuation notice. The residents in this area must present identification to law enforcement at the High Drive road block. No others will be allowed in the area.

The evacuation center is located at the Mountain View Bible Fellowship, located at 1575 South Saint Vrain Ave./Highway 7, at the corner of Peak View Drive. The cooperating agencies, the Red Cross and the Salvation Army are staffing this evacuation center. Information is provided to evacuees on site. Large animals may be taken to the Stanley Park Fairgrounds at 1209 Manford Ave.

Comments

Pure speculation

When does science ever do "pure speculation"? If it did, it wouldn't be science. PNAS doesn't seem to have ever published non-scientific studies.

Anyway, here's another piece, from Nature, among voluminous science on this particular area of climate change (Google Scholar away!):

[color=#0000ff]http://www.nature.com/news/forest-fires-burn-out-1.11424[/color]


When does science ever do "pure speculation"? If it did, it wouldn't be science.

And when it comes to climate change - it usually isn't (science that is).

The predictions of the climate change alarmist have been so wrong it is amazing that even the kool aid crowd is still willing to recite them.

This explaination for the fires has far more credibility.

http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/06/whos-to-blame-for-the-we...


I don't know, FF. A blog piece by Ron Arnold (!) vs. peer-reviewed science. I guess I'd say the peer-reviewed science has "far more credibility."

(And since you brought up the importance of credibility and credentialing, where did Ron Arnold get his PhD in a physical science?)


Peer reviewed science? Tell us- what has peered reviewed science re climate change produced to date - dozens of absolutely wrong predictions.

As to Arnold - he isn't the authority, but Rice, a 30 year (and retired) veteran of the Forest Service would be considered a valid authority on forest issues - like mismanagment of fires.



No matter which side of the climate change argument you're on, there's no question this fall has been much drier than normal in the Estes Park area, and that has a big impact on wildfires. One example: it's been 37 days since the last measureable rainfall. Oct and Nov averages for Estes Park are 4.7 inches of snowfall and 1.43 inches of total precip. This year Oct and Nov precip = 0.46 inches or about 1/3 of normal.


what has peered reviewed science re climate change produced to date - dozens of absolutely wrong predictions.

Well, there's the NCAR analysis that came out a few weeks ago in Science. But as for the claim of "wrong predictions" in general, you're repeating one the pop culture myths about climate change. You might find the site below useful. It debunks these myths, providing references and links to the published science. It will also walk you through the basic science of climate change and modeling, FF.

[color=#0000ff]http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php[/color][/url]

but Rice, a 30 year (and retired) veteran of the Forest Service would be considered a valid authority on forest issues

Why "far more credible" than U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell and the scientists?


Why "far more credible" than U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell and the scientists?

Because he was a Forest Service guy talking about forest issues. Tidwell is a Forest Service guy talking about climate. You can't see the difference?

Re credibility - I repeat http://www.c3headlines.com/predictionsforecasts/

Were flat temperatures for the last 16 years part of your "scientific predictions"?


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.