You are here

Isle Royale National Park's Wolf Population Down To Just Eight, No New Pups Last Year

Share

Published Date

March 27, 2013
Will these three wolves, members of the "West-end Trio," be among among the last to lope across Isle Royale National Park? Photo courtesy of Dr. John Vucetich, Michigan Tech.

Just eight wolves can be found at Isle Royale National Park, the lowest count ever tallied, and no new pups were brought into the population last year, another first that seemingly moves the population closer to extinction.

But against that dire news, National Park Service officials continue to work towards a solution that could reverse the wolves' plight, and a rebounding moose population could contribute by offering the eight a bountiful prey base.

If there's any good news to be found in the annual census released Tuesday, it's that biologists now believe at least four, and maybe five, of the wolves are females; a year ago they thought there were just two.

Tracking the vagaries of wolf dynamics at Isle Royale is difficult, wildlife biologist John Vucetich explained Tuesday, because genetic sampling is used to determine sex, and those tests take time. Lack of funds prevented testing on scat samples collected the past two years until this past January, when the results became known.

Rebuilding the island's wolf population won't be easy, though, as the animals long have suffered from inbreeding.

Three decades ago Isle Royale was home to multiple packs totaling 50 individuals. But lone wolves searching for new territories don't easily find themselves on Isle Royale, as ice bridges that allow them to cross Lake Superior from Ontario to the island are few and fragile due to warming waters and somewhat mild winters. As a result, there hasn't been a refreshing infusion of off-island wolf genes since a Canadian male made that 15-mile ice bridge crossing in 1997.

His arrival did provide a welcome burst of genes. He sired 34 offspring, which in turn produced at least 22 of their own. But the passage of time without additional mainland interlopers has narrowed the gene pool.

Park officials are expected to propose possible solutions later this year. In the meantime, wildlife biologists will be carefully watching to see if any pups are born this spring. Last year's failure to produce a litter was startling.

"For wolves, making pups is a relatively easy thing to do," Dr. Vucetich, who monitors the wolves along with Dr. Rolf Peterson from their Michigan Tech base in Houghton, Michigan, said Tuesday during a phone call. "When they are unable to do it, it certainly is noteworthy."

Adding concern to that failure a year ago was the new realization that there were at least four females for breeding a year ago, said Dr. Vucetich. "What's of a concern now, is that the reason they're not reproducing is not because they can't find females; it's for some other reason," he said.

And yet, that concern could vanish overnight if pups show up next month.

"If they have pups this April, then I guess you'd say (last year's failure) is a fluke, they just couldn't do it," the wildlife biologist said. "But if they don't reproduce two years in a row, then of course, it's already an OK question to ask: Is this the beginning of the end?"

Moose, Vegetation Thriving As Wolves Decline

The steady decline of wolves at Isle Royale comes as other facets of the park's natural kingdom are on the rise.

Alternate Text
Moose are rebounding in number on Isle Royale, and that means a plentiful food base for wolves. Photo courtesy of Dr. John Vucetich.

While the moose population plummeted to as few as 530 in 2009, that decline allowed robust vegetative growth to occur on the 45-mile-long island in Lake Superior. That growth fed a rebound, and today the ungulates number roughly 900.

"Because moose were so low for so long, it gave an opportunity for the vegetation to just rebound in a way that I'd never seen in my time on Isle Royale," Dr. Vucetich said. "Balsam fir has experienced a release of growth that they have not seen in 100 years. Moose are up to their eyeballs in food."

And that bountiful buffet has led to an abundance of moose calves, noted Isle Royale Superintendent Phyllis Green.

It remains to be seen if the burgeoning prey base will be enough to buoy the wolf population. Understanding that, the park superintendent has been working with experts in and out of the Park Service to explore options for giving the wolves a lift.

Those options range from doing nothing and possibly watching the predators vanish from the island to bringing in some new animals to perform a "genetic rescue" by contributing to the currently shallow gene pool.

"Some people say, 'Why don't you just go out there and throw wolves at the problem?'" she said Tuesday during a call from her office. "Well, wolves kill wolves. They have territorial disputes all the time. So if your intent in doing that was to replenish the genetics that are there, that might not be your end result.

"Whatever action we take has to be extermely well-thought out. We've gained a lot from the research that's been done for the last 50 years, I think. We need to sort out what are the critical things we need to learn in the next 50 years, too."

For now the eight wolves are roaming the island in two packs of three -- the remnants of the old Chippewa Harbor Pack at the east end and the so-called "West-end Trio -- and two lone wolves in between.

While Superintendent Green expects to have a draft proposal for how to manage the wolves for public review in a few months, she noted Tuesday that climate change is bringing a lot of changes to the park and affecting a lot of species. All that information, plus genetic projections, must be considered in looking at the wolves' future.

"We know these wolves are having genetic issues. Other populations that get isolated because of climate change will, too. So there's going to be limited resources to address all of the issues that come out of climate change," she said. "We have to be really smart about where we focus our resources. That's part of this. That's why we need a good discussion internally on policy and wildlife management and intervention vs. non-intervention. The wolves, they're certainly tenuous, but we've got time to be thoughtful."

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

I thought the whole purpose of the program and the study was to study the NATURAL history of the population. That may mean allowing the population to cease to exist for a while until new blood and genes cross over on the ice as the moose population skyrockets. If global warming keeps this from happening, then humankind has to decide whether to let nature take its course or whether to intervene, and in doing so, put away all pretense that what is being studied is a natural process and is now more akin to game management without the firearms.


You're absolutely right, Rudy. We discussed just those points two years ago:

/2011/04/how-stable-future-isle-royale-national-parks-wolf-population7994

It certainly will be interesting how the Park Service comes down on the future of the wolves. One of the agency's mandates is to allow natural processes to proceed in the parks.


as ice bridges that allow them to cross Lake Superior from Ontario to the island are few and fragile due to warming waters and somewhat mild winters.

Is that a fair statement? From what I read, the ice bridge of 1948-1949 which led to the initial introduction was a rare and from what I can tell not since repeated event.


If global warming keeps this from happening, then humankind has to decide whether to let nature take its course or whether to intervene, and in doing so, put away all pretense that what is being studied is a natural process and is now more akin to game management without the firearms.

One might argue that if human-induced global warming is preventing an ice bridge from forming, then introducing wolves would be consistent with restoring species extirpated by human activities.


Is that a fair statement? From what I read, the ice bridge of 1948-1949 which led to the initial introduction was a rare and from what I can tell not since repeated event.

a Canadian male made that 15-mile ice bridge crossing in 1997.


ec, according to the scientists, there was a bridge in 1997 that allowed a male to reach the island. See graph 6 above.


So, indeed, a rare event. And not one that seems to have been altered by "warming".


If they sit on their hands, the wolves will die out. Then Isle Royale will revert to what it was before these wolves appeared: what many NPS people called "a barnyard." The moose population will skyrocket, the island will be overgrazed again, the system will be out of whack again. The arrival of the wolves was a godsend and helped rehabilitate that place.

Throw some fresh wolves in there, get some fresh genes. Look, a laissez faire approach to this island isn't particularly correct, because human beings decimated the native species years ago. There used to be lynx and woodland caribou. This place needs aggressive human management. It's not pristine. Because of global warming, the age of regular ice freezes is over. No point in letting it go to seed. Animals can't migrate to that island like they used to. Reintroduction has succeeded in many Natl Parks (Yellowstone wolves, bighorn sheep all over, etc), and I've never understood why the Isle Royale people have always insisted on dragging their feet.


Donate Popup

The National Parks Traveler keeps you informed on how politics impact national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.