You are here

National Park Service Cracks Open Door To Fundraising Tied To Alcoholic Beverages

Share

Published Date

September 19, 2013

When the National Park Service's centennial rolls around in three years, will you be able to sidle up to the bar and order a Park Service-approved drink? That's one concern tied to the agency's decision to, in one case so far, waive its prohibition against fundraising campaigns involving alcholic beverages.

Earlier this year we reported on the agreement the National Park Foundation made with Adler Fells Winery to market a national park-branded collection of wines, with $2 of every sale going to the Foundation for its work in the parks.

As we noted at the time, this is just a trial balloon, as normally the Foundation doesn't get into deals involving alcoholic beverages, and it needed an exception to the norm to run this pilot fund-raiser.

However, in approving the exemption, Park Service officials seem to have cracked open the door a bit for more waivers when it comes to alcoholic beverage companies partnering with the parks.

In the waiver request (attached below), which was approved by Park Service Director Jon Jarvis, the assistant director for partnerships and civic engagement noted that the agreement with Adler Fells would "allow the National Park Service to evaluate how this type of program is received by the public, our partners, and employees; provide invaluable first-hand knowledge as we contemplate potential updates to Director's Order 21, and; demonstrate our willingness to reconsider the prohibition based on the success of partnerships with wine, beer, and spirits companies that are increasingly common for organizations from The Arbor Day Foundation, to the Alzheimer's Association, to Project Red, to charities benefitting wounded warriers."

Questioning this decision is Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which obtained the waiver document via a Freedom of Information requestion.

"The deal would run through the 2016 NPS Centennial. So, we might soon see such sumptuous offerings as Death Valley Pinot, Petrified Forest Port, Everglades Zin and Dry Tortugas Chardonnay," he told the Traveler. "Part of the offered rationale for this waiver is to allow NPS to explore 'partnerships with wine, beer and spirits companies.' Future promiscuous corporate partnering may have us on the lookout for Big Bend Lager, Voyageurs Vodka, Great Smoky Mountain Bourbon.

"These products would surely liven up any park visitor center and make nature walks a bit more, shall we say, exploratory," said Mr. Ruch. "This also suggests that the (Park Service) Centennial will be an unprecedented corporate partnership-palooza."

The move down this road is an interesting contrast to the decision made earlier this year by Mammoth Cave National Park officials to end the sale of beer and wine at the Caver's Campstore in the park because of "a dramatic increase in alcohol-related law enforcement incidents."

Traveler footnote: How successful the arrangement with Adler Fells has been to date is uncertain. Foundation officials couldn't immediately say Wednesday how much they've realized from the deal.

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Why not? And in some states, they could add marijuana. Heck, I can think of a whole list of other personal recreation products that might help make the celebration even better.


No problem with a little good wine in the Parks--- but Lee, a Death Valley Doobee not such a good idea....


Not really a big surprise that the substance-abusing (taxpayer dollars) government would find this slippery slope attractive. The 'spirits' companies love these sorts of chances to improve their image. I seriously doubt they give a rodent's rump about the parks or the other charities mentioned. IMO, these "promiscuous" so-called partnerships degrade the parks, bit by bit, and show how badly NPS management has lost its way.

The 'Glacier Room' at the Paradise Inn (Joni Mitchell's "swingin' hot spot") was converted to accessible rooms a couple years ago. I'm sure the poor overworked road patrol rangers heartily approve of fewer callouts in the wee hours for drunken accidents.


Gutz and Tahoma, I wonder if all of it is NPS management and how much might be Congressional pressure to keep their favorite contributors happy.

Either way, it's a melancholy situation.


Does the NPS allow partnering with other companies with different products?

From this statement, "As we noted at the time, this is just a trial balloon, as normally the Foundation doesn't get into deals involving alcoholic beverages, and it needed an exception to the norm to run this pilot fund-raiser.," I am guessing the answer is yes.

So I'm guessing that the reaction here is due to the product being alcohol, rather than the partnering aspect. If the NPS partners with other companies promoting other products, does the NPS always sell them on park property?


NPS management likes to keep a certain plausible deniability by working through it's fellow-traveler, the NPF. Here are a couple past partnerships not involving alcohol that raised more than a few eyebrows. No doubt there were others that weren't so 'transparent'.

Coke/plastic bottles:

/2012/01/peer-calls-transparency-national-park-foundation-its-corporate-partnerships9370

Monster Meadow Masher:

/2011/01/updated-national-park-foundation-and-special-national-parks-edition-toyota-fj-cruiser7422


NPCA (National Parks Conservation Association) and National Parks Foundation are two separate organizations that are quite different in their purposes and methods of operation.


Thanks, Lee. I've corrected that mistake.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.