I typically send about $100 per year to the NPS foundation.

I also donate on site, such as the boxes at the visitors centers. Usually $10 here and $10 there but, with the time we spend in the parks, it adds up.

Currently, I am a full time camper/rver. If I am near a federal park, be it NFS, BLM, COE, or NPS, I stay there. If not, I use the state parks. In the last 10 months, at least 85% of my camping fees were paid to government entities. While there, I also pick up trash because it is 'my' park. Next year, we also have plans to start volunteering in parks; while this does not add money to their coffiers, it does save the park money.

We have quite a few years before we qualify for the 'geezer' pass. 1/2 price camping! Our budget will suddenly have a lot of room. But, chances are, we will find a way to put the funds toward the parks. Without the existence of the National Parks, we probably wouldn't be on the road today.

Not as much as I should, but pretty much as much as I can afford.  I do contribute a goodly amount to the Yellowstone Association, though.

Gonna have to take another look at the budget.

A good question .... and a reminder that those of us who have a Senior Pass don't have to use it when we get to a park entrance station. We could choose to just pay the regular fee.

On a related note, perhaps the upcoming NPS centennial is the time to seriously discuss giving Americans the option of designating a small part of their federal income taxes to go directly to the NPS via a "check-off" box on our federal tax returns - similar to the option to give to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. If that were to occur, any funds generated should be used for specific purposes, such as to help reduce the maintenance backlog.

Jim - the problem with your check off box suggestion is that funds are fungible.  You check off the box and Congress just assumes they don't have to fund that money.  The Presidential check of "works" only because the government doesn't otherwise (to my knowledge)  fund Presidential elections.

Kurt's article indirectly makes a great point.  Of all the moaning about park funding, how many of these complainers have stepped up and contributed money?  It's like all those complaining that taxes should be higher but I haven't seen any of them write a check.  Come on Warren - oh that's right, you don't even pay taxes you do own.  

ec, you are correct about the risk (likelihood) that Congress would simply reduce funding for the NPS to offset any gains from a checkoff option. That said, it's at least worth a shot. If nothing else, it would be a way for taxpayers to demonstrate their support for parks.

Why do members of the military get a free pass?

Hmmm, I wonder....to what extent would the present impoverished NPS naturalist/educational/interpretive programs be stimulated if park rangers (and park volunteers) performing this work were permitted to accept tips from park visitors for outstanding service?

Owen!

For Heaven's sake be quiet.

Next thing you know Congress will decide to treat rangers like waitresses in restaurants.  Work like a slave for $1.25 and whatever tips you receive.

Don't give those beggars any more bad ideas.  They generate enough of their own.

Repent, man.  Repent!