You are here

NPCA: Desert Sunlight Solar Farm Evidence Of Why California Desert Protection And Recreation Act Is Needed

Share

Published Date

February 10, 2015

The timing no doubt was coincidence, but while Interior Secretary Sally Jewell was celebrating the country's largest solar project in California, two U.S. senators were introducing legislation to protect desert landscapes in the state.

The irony wasn't lost on the National Parks Conservation Association, which has questioned the location of the solar farm.

“There is a lot of celebrating today in the California desert. Senator Feinstein released the California Desert Conservation and Recreation Act and Sally Jewell flipped the on-switch at Desert Sunlight Solar plant. The confluence of these events highlights the important work that remains to be done in the California desert," said David Lamfrom, NPCA's California Desert associate director. "That includes permanently protecting some of the most beautiful and vibrant lands in America and the continued need to do a better job of siting renewable energy away from species-rich lands. Considering how important our national parks and protected lands are to our desert economy, finding this balance now is fundamental​.”

Earlier Monday, the Interior secretary and the director of the Bureau of Land Management Neil Kornze joined California state and industry leaders to “flip the switch” on the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm. Now operating at full capacity, the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm is providing 550 megawatts of electricity to the grid, enough energy to power 160,000 average homes. The facility is estimated to displace 300,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year – the equivalent to taking 60,000 cars off the road.

“Solar projects like Desert Sunlight are helping to create American jobs, develop domestic renewable energy and cut carbon pollution,” said Secretary Jewell. “I applaud the project proponents for their vision and entrepreneurial spirit to build this solar project and commend Governor Brown for implementing policies that take action on climate change and help move our nation toward a renewable energy future.”

Desert Sunlight is the sixth solar project approved on public lands that is now operational. Together with wind, solar and geothermal, the renewable energy projects built on public lands since 2009 are producing over 2,200 megawatts of power, or enough to power almost 700,000 average homes. An additional 2,500 megawatts is currently under construction, including eight solar projects in California and Nevada.

Desert Sunlight is located on about 4,100 acres managed by the BLM in Riverside County, about 70 miles east of Palm Springs and six miles north of the rural community of Desert Center. The facility uses more than eight million First Solar photovoltaic modules to generate power with no air emissions, no waste production and no water use. The thin film technology has the smallest carbon footprint of any photovoltaic technology. The renewable energy is sold to Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Southern California Edison under long-term contracts.

As part of the Interior Department’s commitment to responsible development of renewable energy, the Desert Sunlight project underwent extensive environmental review and mitigation. The BLM worked in close coordination with Desert Sunlight, the National Park Service and other stakeholders to significantly reduce the proposed project’s total footprint down from the proposed 19,000 acres. The BLM is requiring that Desert Sunlight provide funding for acquisition and enhancement of more than 7,500 acres of suitable habitat for desert tortoise and other sensitive wildlife species to help mitigate the project’s potential impacts.

Also on Monday, Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, both California Democrats, introduced legislation that would expand by 75,000 acres the Mojave National Preserve and Death Valley and Joshua Tree national parks.

“This piece of legislation is the final chapter in a long effort to preserve one of the most magnificent landscapes in the United States,” Sen. Feinstein said. “We must ensure that critical parts of the California desert—with its mountain vistas, bighorn sheep, mule deer, desert tortoises, Joshua trees, Native American petroglyphs and much more—will be protected for all time.”

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Why bother? You'll dodge.

Dodge, or provide answers you don't like and can't refute.  Just more of your empty accusations.

And I read the csmonitor article.  Don't quite see what your point was. I certainly didn't see where the article claimed all the top of the economic heap had an entitlement mentality.  Can prayer help. Probably, but more those that are praying than those being prayed for. 


Suddenly, I'm not feeling the "love." EC, I have great respect for the corporate class; however, it is not the latest bunch. When my dad worked at "the plant," the owner made ten times his salary. Now it is often hundreds more. You say there is nothing unethical about sending a job overseas. Agreed. However, then you say that perhaps by exporting a job, the company can offer a superior product at a lower price. Today's corporate class argues this all the time. The adjective in play is "superior." But what if it is NOT superior? What if it is only cheaper to make? That blazer I bought from Nordstrom's made in the USA? It lasted me five years. I can't find it anymore at that allegedly "lower price." What I can find at the price is at Men's Wearhouse and hardly lasts a year.

As a historian, I am always looking for the adjectives. Do they describe the action or do they mislead? Green in front of energy is also an adjective meant totally to mislead. How about just energy? Well, the corporate moguls know that will never work. As do you know by your choice of words that "superior" is needed to make your argument. The point remains that if the consumer cannot afford it, because the consumer no longer has a job, it doesn't matter the quality or the price. We're done. Asia rising. Until yes, WE go in the hole.

Right now, we are spending down our inheritance to keep all of this afloat. Fine. I just don't want it to include our public lands. The billionaires can have the rest of it, but I still don't think we should give them that. And one day, probably when we are dead, they won't be billionaires any longer. Because the only thing that made them that way was the "superior" system of government that allowed it. You want to bet that the "system" will survive by sending our best jobs overseas? In that case, you are swimming against the tide of history, but hey, what does history have to do with it? All the kids are taking business now.


PS Christine is home and asking for her valentine. I told her it is tied up at the docks on one of those ships from China that can't unload. Guess how far I got with that? So, I had better take her out to dinner, but yes, you have been great valentines, and I salute you!


Alfred - cheaper is good enough for me - assuming the same quality.  If it is inferior, don't buy it.  Nobody is forcing you to buy any product --- oh except for Obama forcing you to buy insurance. 

Now go take care of Christine.


Let's try to return to something I pointed out earlier. 

Let's hear some comments -- rational comments -- on the information in graphs in this article.  How can we possibly justify the personal emissions of each of us Americans?

(I couldn't copy the graph, so here's the link to the entire article again)

http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/11/numbers-china-us-climate-agreement

And the Slate article  -- but please don't coment until after reading the entire article.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/11/obama_s...

Don't try dodging again.


Let's try to return to something I pointed out earlier. 


Great post, Alfred.  Exactly what I've been clumsily trying to say.  Green Energy -- Clean Coal, both great propaganda  trying to sell something to gullible people.

Have a fine dinner with your valentine!


How can we possibly justify the personal emissions of each of us Americans?

Why is justification needed?

Let's hear some comments -- rational comments -- on the information in graphs in this article.

Apparently you didn't read the article.  There is no "information" it is all conjecture and supposition as admitted by the author.

 

PS- still waiting for my "mistakes".

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.