You are here

UPDATED: Petition Drive To Keep Historic Names In Yosemite National Park Gaining Momentum

Share

Published Date

January 19, 2016

A petition drive is underway to block DNC Parks & Resorts at Yosemite's trademark claims at Yosemite. Rather than pay for those rights, the National Park Service has opted to rename historic lodges, such as the Wawona Hotel, which would be known as the Big Trees Lodge/David and Kay Scott

Editor's note: This updates with the National Park Service and Department of Justice declining to comment on the trademark matter.

A petition drive launched soon after Yosemite National Park officials said they would change the names of historic lodges rather than entertain DNC Parks & Resorts at Yosemite Inc.'s request for $51 million in exchange for the trademarks and other intellectual property is gaining momentum.

As of Monday the petition, started by Columbia College (California) Art Professor Laurie Sylwester, was nearing its goal of 4,000 signatures. Once that number is met, the petition is to be delivered to Congress with a request that that body make DNC Parks & Resorts release the trademarks.

These historical names include three indigenous American names, people with ancestors dating back 12,000 years in the region, long before Delaware North was a corporation. Our tax dollars support Yosemite National Park and no corporation may own that great heritage.

However,the petition cites no legal mechanism for Congress to use to achieve that goal. Congress did in December 2014 amend the U.S. Code with language under Section 302106 that specifically gives the National Park Service the right to "retain the name historically associated with the building or structure" regardless of any trademark. However, that provision was not mentioned by the Department of Justice earlier this month when it asked a federal claims court to dismiss Delaware North's claim for more than $10 million in damages.

National Park Service officials on Tuesday referred questions about that provision to the Department of Justice, where spokeswoman Nicole A. Navas declined to comment as the matter was in litigation.

The issue of trademarking words attached to properties in the National Park System arose in 2014 year when the Park Service released a prospectus for a 15-year contract involving concessions at Yosemite. During the process, DNC, which has held the concessions business in Yosemite since 1993, notified the Park Service that it held "intellectual property" rights in the form of trademarks attached to lodgings in the park.

If Delaware North is unsuccessful in bidding for the new contract, the company said it would seek $51 million to relinquish those marks, and other intellectual property, to the new concessionaire. That led the Park Service to say it would allow a concessionaire other than Delaware North to propose name changes to the facilities, which in some cases have been in operation for more than a century under the same name.

DNC did indeed lose the contract. 

Last Thursday ay park officials, possibly looking to avoid a costly trademark fight with DNC Parks & Resorts, announced that they would change the names of iconic lodges in the park. The Ahwahnee Hotel, for instance, would be known going forward as the Majestic Yosemite Hotel. Other changes included:

● Yosemite Lodge at the Falls to become: Yosemite Valley Lodge

● The Ahwahnee to become: The Majestic Yosemite Hotel

● Curry Village to become: Half Dome Village

● Wawona Hotel to become: Big Trees Lodge

● Badger Pass Ski Area to become: Yosemite Ski & Snowboard Area

Additional background on the trademark dispute in Yosemite and elsewhere in the National Park System can be found in these Traveler stories:

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2014/12/what-value-ahwahnee-hotel-c...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2014/12/historian-says-delaware-nor...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2015/01/yosemite-trademark-discussi...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2015/01/us-code-might-allow-nationa...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2015/01/xanterra-parks-resorts-make...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2015/01/national-park-service-will-...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2015/02/new-prospectus-grand-canyon...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2015/03/xanterra-parks-resorts-aban...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2015/09/delaware-north-companies-su...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2015/10/new-yosemite-concessionaire...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2016/01/government-calls-delaware-n...

http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2016/01/dnc-says-national-park-serv...

Related Stories:

Stories about:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

claims about Minuteman Missile top secrecy. 

Already provided that Lee, as opposed to your failures to provide examples of DNC engaging in unethical or illegal activity.  Do you really think those pages are removing regulations?  If so, I have a bridge I would like to sell you.  


How many of those pages contain things that actually weaken regulation?  Some in Congress have been working hard to eliminate regulation on their pet industries or corporations.  Did anyone catch Frontline last night with it's expose' of health foods and supplements?  Merely looking at the pile of paper proves nothing.  Start reading, ec, and let us know what you find.  Who knows, you might even come across something that would support your baseless claims about Minuteman Missile top secrecy.  Or not.


How many of those pages contain things that actually weaken regulation?

Not enough

(CNSNews.com) - Over the past three years, the bound edition of the Code of FederalRegulations has increased by 11,327 pages - a 7.4 percent increase from Jan. 1, 2009 to Dec. 31, 2011. In 2009, the increase in the number of pages was the most over the last decade - 3.4 percent or 5,359 pages.

 


You did? Where?

Aw, shucks, thanks for the offer, but I don't know about buying the bridge.  What would you have to live under?

Keep smiling and watch out for low flying turtles.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.