You are here

Traveler's View: President's FY17 Request For National Park Service Disappointing

Share

Published Date

February 10, 2016

When a single F-35 fighter for the Air Force -- just one -- costs in the neighborhood of $100 million, and when the helmet for the pilot of that fighter costs $400,000, is it too much to ask for better funding for America's greatest idea?

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell was practically glowing over President Obama's $4-trillion-plus FY17 budget request, which seeks but $3.1 billion for the National Park Service.

"Highlights" of the request for Interior, she said Tuesday, include the president's "(c)ontinuing historic efforts to revitalize the Nation’s parks and public lands for the next century in recognition of the National Park Service Centennial."

Just days after Park Service Director Jon Jarvis announced that his agency's maintenance backlog was nearly $12 billion, the Interior secretary was applauding the president's proposed $250 million increase in the Park Service's "essential programs and operational needs."

But then, Secretary Jewell works for the president, and so has to support his request. And while the Republican-held Congress most certainly will reject it, the 306.6 million folks who visited a unit of the National Park System last year should lobby Congress to do the president a billion or more better for the parks.

While we are fast approaching the National Park Service's centennial, Park Service salaries continue to lag against those of their peers in the land-management agencies, morale across the agency continues to flag, and the National Park System's infrastructure continues to deteriorate.

Aside from the Find Your Park campaign, which seems to be succeeding in drawing more crowds into the parks, how is the Park Service itself being celebrated on its 100th birthday? As the centennial approaches, park managers are increasingly concerned about how they will manage visitation and resources this summer. The requests from Park Service headquarters to generate centennial events are wearing down some in the field.

What the agency needs is a serious dose of optimism, enthusiasm, and invigoration. One Park Service retiree recently quipped that what the agency needs is another Mission 66, that 10-year program to prepare the National Park System not only for its 50th anniversary in 1966 but also for the onslaught of Baby Boomers who were discovering the joys of seeing America in their Chevrolets.

The National Park Service is the second most-liked agency in federal government, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center, and yet the infrastructure and employees are not treated accordingly by those who hold the purse strings in Washington.

“Despite this encouraging movement away from years of damaging budget constraints that have harmed our parks, they still face significant challenges," Theresa Pierno, president and CEO of the National Parks Conservation Association, said Tuesday in trying to voice some optimism around the president's request. "The Park Service continues to lack the funding needed just to keep up with its now near $12 billion deferred maintenance backlog, the construction account central to addressing half of this backlog remains more than 60 percent below its level 15 years ago in today’s dollars, and there are not enough rangers and other staff to protect nationally significant resources and handle the record-breaking crowds heading to our parks.

How dire are things across the National Park System? According to the agency's own asset inventory:

* Water systems: There is $172.8 million in "critial systems deferred maintenance" in water systems across the parks landscape, and another $422.1 million in deferred maintenance that was not performed when it should have been;

* Waste water systems: Sewer systems across the parks currently face $114.8 million in critical systems deferred maintenance, and another $270.5 million in deferred maintenance;

* Trails: These paths face $173.2 million in critical systems deferred maintenance, and another $481.6 million in deferred maintenance.

And the list goes on, to the tune of $11.9 billion. Healthy parks, healthy people?

"One of the most important ways Congress can support parks as they move into their next century of service is to make sure next year’s budget includes significant increases to the agency’s maintenance and operations accounts," said Ms. Pierno. "The Park Service needs these resources to tackle overdue repairs, fill vacant ranger positions, leverage philanthropic support, protect parks from development, and allow our parks to thrive in their second century."

Before the parks can thrive in the Park Service's second century, though, they need to survive today's budget climate. Perhaps if the National Park Service had its own air force it would merit more attention from Congress and the president.

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

EC, I have always thought you do like the Parks and I agree that fiscal responsibility is an important issue. One of these days, if our trails cross, we can discuss the other issues in another venue. I was reading an article last night in the Nation magazine by Ann Jones, "A Crash Course in Social Democracy", Feb.15 issue. A very interesting perspective of a journalist who worked in Afghanistan then Norway and returned to the US. She makes some interesting points on some of the issues you have raised. In any case thanks for the response. 


I find the President's FY 2017 budget for the NPs to be more than a dissappointment, it is a disaster and further evidence of the gradual decline of the entire NPS system. There is not one word of this in public debates. I fear that this long term problem, if not corrected, will lead to the eventual collapse of our great National Park System. We are the hiers of giants, Mather and Albright, who gave us the park system. The question now is are we smart and capable enough to elect a Congress and President who will see that our wonderful system of parks can survive for the next 100 years. I may be pessimist but I think not. I hope that I am wrong.

 

www.transsiberianexpress.net/trans-mongolian-trains.html

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.