An oil refinery proposed just three miles from the South Unit of Theodore Roosevelt National Park (above) has raised concerns of how it might impact the park's air quality/Kurt Repanshek
While falling oil prices have slowed production from North Dakota's oil and natural gas fields, a company sees that lull as the perfect opportunity to build a crude oil refinery in the state.
However, its proposed location just three miles from Theodore Roosevelt National Park has raised concerns from the National Park Service and conservation groups about how it will impact the park.
At Meridian Energy Group, Inc., the California company behind the $850 million refinery that could process 55,000 barrels of crude a day at full capacity, officials claim their proposed Davis Refinery would be "the cleanest plant ever built."
Others think it's a plant that should never be built in its proposed location.
“They shouldn’t be putting an industrial park next to a national park," Valerie Naylor, the park's former superintendent, said Friday during a phone call. "If this was being proposed within three miles of Yellowstone, Glacicer, Yosemite, or even Mount Rushmore, there would be a huge national outcry. I don’t know why there shouldn’t be a similar outcry about Theodore Roosevelt."
Targeted for a 620-acre swath of farmland between Belfield and Fryburg just east of Theodore Roosevelt, the refinery project is just the latest industrial development pressing in on the 70,447-acre national park. The U.S. Forest Service last year gave the OK for a 25-acre gravel pit across the Little Missouri River from Theodore Roosevelt's historic Elkhorn Ranch and roughly 25 miles from the core of the park's South Unit, while oil pumps dot the landscape in just about every direction. From Buck Hill in the park's South District, gas flares from fracking operations outside the park stand out at night.
The park, of course, was named after Theodore Roosevelt, who came to this landscape as a young man and discovered his conservation bent. The Elkhorn Ranch was where he recovered from the deaths of his wife, Alice, two days after giving birth to their daughter, and his mother on the same day, Valentine's Day 1884. The ranch setting remains bucolic today. While the ranch house is gone, there still stand some of the cottonwood trees that shaded the house and the porch from which the young Roosevelt would escape the heat with a book or simply to rock in his chair while taking in the Little Missouri and the badlands that it carved into the landscape.
Back in 2011, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, citing the gravel pit, named the ranch as one of its 11 most-endangered historic sites in the country. The pit is a byproduct of the oil boom, as it is a source for stone needed for the drill pads rising around northwestern North Dakota. Now, if plans to construct the oil refinery come to fruition, Theodore Roosevelt National Park might claim the distinction of being rimmed by more energy-related developments than any other park in the National Park System.
Oil refineries aren't often built in the United States. Currently, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, there are just 137 active refineries. Since the turn of the century, just three refineries have been built, and since 1985 just eight refineries came on line, the agency's records show. Just one of those eight, the Petro Star refinery in Valdez, Alaska, produces as much as 55,000 barrels per day, or as much as the Davis Refinery is designed to produce.
As proposed, the Davis Refinery would produce "(R)efined products include gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, heating oil, as well as lesser-known products such as lubricants, asphalt base, ethane for plastics, waxes and other specialty chemicals. The initial phase of the Refinery will focus on the production of jet fuel, diesel fuel and other distillate products, primarily for local markets."
Park Superintendent Wendy Ross says the refinery, if built in its current proposed location, would be visible from the Buck Hill Trail in the South Unit/Kurt Repanshek
The proposed location is adjacent to a BNSF rail loading facility at Fryburg; the rail line actually runs through the refinery site. Oil and natural gas pipelines are close by, too, according to Meridian.
The property also is near the junction of Highway 85 and Interstate 94. Highway 85 is the main north-south arterial that tanker trucks can use to carry crude from the Bakken field to pipeline and rail terminals.
On their website company officials, noting that more than 95 percent of the daily production from the Bakken is taken out of state for processing, say building a refinery "in the heart of the Bakken will ensure a steady supply of below-market crude oil feedstock from production companies seeking transportation savings and a local market for refined fuels."
Beyond the proposed Davis Refinery, though, Meridian officials expect their plant would attract "compatible industrial process units," according to a zoning application they filed with Billings (North Dakota) County officials. "For example, Meridian has received inquiries from agricultural chemicals firms, brewing companies, and others interested in locating facilities nearby once the Project is in operation," the documents state.
The company produced a promotional video to explain its plans, but blocked public access after the Traveler story appeared.
Ms. Naylor shudders at the thought of such development so close to Theodore Roosevelt's South Unit.
“That industrial park will extend from Fryburg all the way to Belfield if that is the case," she said, referring to the company's expectations of additional buildout. "That would be a really big industrial area right next to the national park. That’s not acceptable.”
Not without irony, the industrial development, if it materializes, would welcome visitors to North Dakota's No. 1 tourist draw, the national park. This year the state's tourism campaign, starring actor Josh Duhamel, focuses heavily on Theodore Roosevelt National Park. And already this year visitation to the park is up more than a third, and related revenues are nearing $40 million annually.
Company officials were traveling Friday and not immediately available to discuss their project.
In their application to Billings County, they are seeking a zoning change to allow the refinery to be built on acreage currently zoned for agriculture. In addition, they want permission to begin site preparation this summer, before the requisite air quality permits for the entire project are issued, "so that the project does not lose this coming summer as part of the construction schedule for the project." According to Meridian, North Dakota officials said "grading and site construction" can begin before the permits are issued.
As planned, the refinery would be operational by 2018.
Beyond the physical siting of an industrial development so close to the park, opponents worry about its impact on air quality. Many national parks, Theodore Roosevelt included, carry a Class I airshed distinction, which requires the highest level of protection under the Clean Air Act. And according to the National Park Service, Theodore Roosevelt "has some of the best visibility and cleanest air measured among all national parks."
However, the agency has pointed out in the past that "(R)egional oil and gas development, as well as nearby mining operations, power generating facilities, and agriculture, contribute to the formation of ozone and haze, sulfur and nitrogen deposition, and deposition of toxic air contaminants (e.g. mercury) at Theodore Roosevelt NP."
Theodore Roosevelt National Park has seen much development on its borders in recent years. This well pump was visible from the historic Elkhorn Ranch/Kurt Repanshek
How the proposed refinery's contributions would affect that air quality is unknown at this stage. Park Service and state of North Dakota air quality officials say they'll conduct rigorous computer modeling to project what that impact might be. That process alone could take a year, they say.
"It’s a little soon to assert whether there will or will not be park impacts. But I can say with a facility of this size, this close to a national park, we’re really concerned," said Bart Melton, regional director of the National Park Conservation Association's Northern Rockies office. "There’s plenty of room in North Dakota for protecting the park and continuing to grow the economy in the Bakken, which, we’re not opposed to that growth. We just want to make sure that it occurs in a way that protects the park and builds the regional economy, too.”
Wendy Ross, Theodore Roosevelt's superintendent for less than a year, has been almost bowled over by the development ongoing around the park. And while the oil boom has slackened somewhat, she said Friday, that hasn't slowed everything down, citing the gravel pit, efforts to expand Highway 85 from a two-lane to four-lane stretch through the park's North Unit, and other infrastructure projects.
But the proposed refinery, she said, has moved to the top of list of projects that concern her.
“I don’t think anybody really realizes how big this is," said Superintendent Ross.
When the superintendent was asked, she couldn't point to another national park that has been faced by such developments closing in on so many sides.
"I really can’t. If you look down the list, I just haven’t seen anything like that," she said.
At the end of the day, said Ms. Naylor, siting a crude oil refinery next door to a national park is wrong.
“I think there are many, many issues, many questions that are unanswered," she said. "In reality, the biggest issue is this big industrial development shouldn’t be within three miles of one of our premier national parks.”
Comments
Give him a mirror, Lee, monogrammed with Q.E.D., for that unglued thingie.
This is awfully tiresome -- I've answered all your questions many times over with documentation. So have Kurt and many others. You choose to ignore or dodge it.
Has DJT been taking lessons from you?
Dont know why i am getting the double posts. Must be the Italian internet.
the "jury" still out after 6 years is hardly an example of a lifetime of landscape alteration.
And no Lee you havent answered a single one of those. You provide links but because you dont apear to have any real understanding of the issues you are oblivious to the fact those links are totally irrelevant. Lets try this one again. Explain, in your own words, how is a company that pays $57 bil in taxes and nets $16 billion subsidies. Or looking at US operations alone, pays 6+ bil and nets a little over $100 Mill. Hint. LIFO accounting isnt a valid answer.
The problem is that what's on paper and what's actually happening are two different things. The oil companies (and many other industries) take advantage of a cave of tax loopholes larger than Mammoth and Carlsbad combined. Clever accounting allows them to hide the truth behind a smokescreen of gobblydegook.
One very significant subsidy is something called deferred taxes, which as this article explains, amounts to an eternal interest free loan from taxpayers to the industry.
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/economic-intelligence/2014/08/06/the-surpr...
Of course, one can find all sorts of other websites out there, such as the ultra-conservative CNS and others, that parrot industry propaganda for those who spend their time in the echo chamber seeking only the kind of "information" they want to find. It takes some effort to try to sort fact from fiction.
I know all of us who try to answer you are wasting our time. You'll sidestep, dodge and accuse until sunset tomorrow and then move on to another article here.
As for whether or not six years equals a "lifetime," that's just one more example of how you twist the words of others. Yes, it hasn't been a lifetime since Deepwater, but the effects of that spill (and Exxon Valdez) have not stopped. They continue and no one has any idea how long or far reaching their effects may actually extend. There are countless old well pads in the Uintah Basin where wells drilled 50 or even 60 years ago are still sterile patches of despoilation. That's a lifetime for a lot of people. Or we can move away from oil to coal and cite mountaintop removal or abandoned mining claims throughout the world that will be leaking poisonous substances for centuries yet to come.
But there's no point in continuing to try to respond. You'll just use some spilled oil to slip out of it and dodge around it by parsing words or distorting what others say.
Man, you'd make a great politician. Trouble is, the last thing the world needs is more of those.
Clean Refinery????? A big ugly plant that belches smoke and looks like what you see in Huston would not be a positive for the National Park. Oil and water do not mix. There must be more suitable locations in ND that are not 3 miles from the T. Roosevelt National Park. Refinery will not make gasoline and there is excess capacity for diesel in ND so it will not lowere fuel cost to residents of the state. May be a good deal for the investors and generate money to wine and dine politicians but in best interest of ND or it's residents. As of a few weeks ago Meridian had not been able to raise the initial funding to proceed so you are dealing with an under funded developer.
Lee, your ignorance knows no bounds. You should stick to topics you know something about, whatever that might be.
What is on paper is what is required by the SEC and offered by the IRS. There is nothing hidden except from those that have no clue how to read a financial statement. That is unless you are claiming that companies are lying to both. Deferred taxes is an accounting item used by virtually every company it reflects the fact the SEC and the IRS have different accounting methods. There is nothing unique to the oil companies and nothing that refects a subsidy. The only people that see see differed taxes as a loan are the people that believe that the purpose of business is to provide for their employees or that if someone keeps the money they make, its a subsidy.
Yes, and if we used the technology of 50 or 60 years ago it might be an issue. We don't and there isn't.