You are here

Will Legislation To Reduce National Park Service Maintenance Backlog Succeed?

Published Date

April 2, 2017

Trying to reduce the National Park Service's maintenance backlog is complicated by events that drain the agency's few financial resources, such as the October 2015 storm that did heavy damage to Scotty's Castle in Death Valley National Park and the road leading to it/NPS

Much like a homeowner who puts off "until next year" repairs to that leaky roof or well-aged furnace, Congress for years largely has turned a blind eye to growing maintenance issues around the National Park System. While two U.S. senators have introduced legislation to tackle that backlog, estimated at $12 billion, their bill alone won't get the job done.

The outstanding bill is too large, and the payment period -- 30 years -- laid out by Sens. Mark Warner, D-Virginia, and Rob Portman, R-Ohio, too long with too many unknowns to say with any certainty that their National Park Service Legacy Act of 2017 would meet success. If passed by Congress and signed by the president, the measure would budget $50 million in annual appropriations for fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020; $150 million for fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023; $250 million for fiscal years 2024, 2025 and 2026, and; $500 million for fiscal years 2027-2047. Add it up and it comes to $11.85 billion.

But, proponents of the measure say, the senators are starting a key discussion in Congress.

"Obviously, it would have been really great if there would be a proposal that would in ten years take down the backlog," Will Shafroth, president and CEO of the National Park Foundation, said Saturday. "But this is a serious attempt to take care of the most urgent needs in the Park Service. It doesn’t mean that this is the only thing that one could be working on. I’ve had many conversations with Sen. Portman about this. He was on the Second Century Commission, he was the OMB director, he knows how this works,and I don’t think he pretends that this would be a silver bullet, if you will, in terms of taking care of it.

“This is a really, really important step in that direction.”

When the legislation was introduced this past Tuesday, Sen. Warner pointed out that, "(M)ore than 100 years after the founding of the National Park Service, our park system remains in a critical state of disrepair. In fact, Virginia ranks 5th in the list of states with the greatest need for maintenance, with a backlog of more than $800 million."

“While we’ve heard much talk here in Washington about infrastructure spending, a great way to begin this work is by helping in the revitalization of our public lands and the repair of critical roads and bridges, an investment which can generate $10 in economic activity for every public dollar invested," he continued. "Our bipartisan legislation provides this needed investment by helping ensure that these historically diverse assets are preserved for future generations to enjoy. It also makes needed investments in NPS infrastructure, roads and bridges, like the Arlington Memorial Bridge, many of which are badly in need of repair.”

Neither Sen. Warner's nor Sen. Portman's staff returned calls last week to discuss the legislation and its structure.

A complicating factor standing in the way of the measure's end goal, however, is that the maintenance backlog has been growing at the rate of roughly $700 million-$800 million a year. Left unchecked, that could add another $21 billion or more to the backlog over the course of the next three decades. Fortunately, some of that annual growth in the cost of the backlog is being addressed, said Marcia Argust, director of the Pew Charitable Trust's campaign to Restore America’s Parks.

"The bill will have a significant impact on drawing down the backlog. As you may have seen from my written testimony for the (Senate) Energy and Natural Resources Committee last week, NPS is typically $250 - $320 million short of the $800 million it estimates it needs each year to simply maintain transportation and non-transportation assets at current conditions," she said. "By ramping up to a $500 million annual investment in restoration of park infrastructure, NPS would be able to plan and manage maintenance projects more efficiently and in a timely manner. This investment has a cost-savings effect. For example, updating outdated electrical systems ultimately saves on energy bills and fixing roofs saves on more costly repairs.

"It’s also important to keep in mind that, while the NPS Legacy Act is a huge step toward addressing the NPS backlog, there needs to be simultaneous efforts to increase use of public-private partnership opportunities (such as job training in parks, philanthropy, corporate partnerships), as well as research into new technologies that can help NPS tackle maintenance needs," Ms. Argust added. "These efforts will help keep the backlog from escalating."

In the coming weeks and months, the ebb and flow of politics in Washington will shed light on how others in Congress support the parks. Introduced on March 28, the legislation picked up just three more cosponsors last week: Sens. Angus King, an Independent from Maine, Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, and Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii.

How will the Trump administration receive it? Already the president, who has yet to introduce his $1 trillion plan to repair the nation's ailing infrastructure, has called for deep cuts across most agencies, including the Interior Department.

As the legislation moves through the Senate -- it's been referred to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee -- how might it be amended? Will a companion bill be introduced in the House of Representatives, and how might it fare?

On top of those unknowns, the Park Service's maintenance backlog is not a static number, and constantly increases as unexpected expenses arise, such as the October 2015 storm that did an estimated $26 million in damage to Scotty's Castle in Death Valley National Park, and more recent landslides that have damaged the Blue Ridge Parkway.

Please be advised that park staff were notified via park dispatch this morning of a rock slide that occurred near MP 277, 1/2 mile south of Deep Gap. The slide is large with debris covering both lanes of traffic. The slope above the slide area is still unstable. A full Parkway closure from MP 276.4 through MP 280.9 will be in effect through the weekend, if not longer. We will provide updates here when they become available.-- Blue Ridge Parkway Facebook post, March 31, 2017

While neither the Scotty's Castle situation nor the landslide are part of the backlog, they take Park Service resources that might have been used to address aspects of the backlog. In addition, the current backlog figure will change.

"That number ($11.9 billion) is a snapshot from October 1, 2016. We're expecting any day to see the next snapshot. That number fluctuates like the Stock Market," said John Garder, the budget and fiscal specialist for the National Parks Conservation Association. "There are so many variables, you could never actually predict what the backlog looks like in 30 years."

The legislation introduced by Sens. Warner and Portman, he added, is "intended to draw down the backlog, and then get at the current amount of the backlog, but those numbers will change. There may be amendments to the bill that would adjust the numbers, and it's very difficult to predict. What we can say is it is an amount that would address a great deal of the backlog, which would be very, very helpful, to not only preserve and restore our heritage, but also ensure that the tourism economy can remain robust.

"Drawing down the backlog would allow recreational amenities and all of the things that visitors care about in terms of cultural and natural heritage and facilities that accommodate visitation," said Mr. Garder.

Back at the National Park Foundation, Mr. Shafroth fully realizes the tenuous nature of Congress.

“It’s a bipartisan effort, and even given this budget climate, it’s a statement that there are people who are viewed as leaders in the Senate who are willing to put the names on legislation that’s going to take a real whack at addressing the maintenance backlog," he said, pointing to the legislation. “This is important stuff. Obviously it’s an uphill battle because of the budget challenges that are going on right now, and the uncertainty about how this will be received by the administration, but nonetheless a really important statement for them to make in terms of their view of this being a priority.”

But this legislation, if it somehow gains passage -- no certainty with Congress still needing to deal with the debt ceiling and funding for the rest of the current fiscal year, let alone the next -- is not the only tool available for eating away at the maintenance backlog.

Mr. Shafroth pointing to the National Park Service Centennial Act passed in the dying days of the last Congress that created funding vehicles to raise more money to be used in addressing the backlog. 

The Centennial Act calls for the deposit of up to $10 million generated from all Park Service sales of America The Beautiful - The National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Passes into a Second Century Endowment for the Park Service to be managed by the National Park Foundation. Any revenues above $10 million would be deposited into a Centennial Challenge fund for projects in the parks. However, those dollars would need to be matched by private dollars before they could be spent.

Under that formula, the theoretical $46 million figure cited above would deposit $10 million into the Second Century Endowment and $36 million into the Centennial Challenge fund.

“It’s a marker," Mr. Shafroth said of the National Park Service Legacy Act. "There has to be a start here from the legislative process, which is what they’ve done, and I think is really important.”

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

It would be good to know whether the private companies running the parks (and benefiting from their upkeep) are going to add anything to the financial support of these parks and the proposed bill up for consideration in Congress.  These companies have taken over ownership of longstanding park names and other aspects that really belong to the people of the United States.  Yet it appears that they only want to make money on the backs of the tax payers.  Who is keeping an eye on this serious issue?


It would be good to know whether the private companies running the parks (and benefiting from their upkeep) are going to add anything to the financial support of these parks...

These private companies pay considerable concessionaires fees that do just that.  In some cases, the fees are so high or the operations so unprofitable that they don't even bid and the visitors go without services.


This gonna hurt the haters: 

Trump donates first-quarter salary to National Park Service   http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/327036-trump-donates-first-...

Man wants a legacy, looks like the NPS is gonna be ok.


Wow, wonder how many apologies we are going to see from those making baseless accusations. 


Hmmm, $12 billion backlog, $78,000. Yeah, that takes care of it.


Better wait to see if the check clears before getting too excited. There are a lot of contractors and Drumpf University students who are still waiting for theirs to arrive in the mail.


Not quite as effective a publicity stunt as signing a "treaty" that is never submitted to the Senate for approval to lower the temperature in 75 years by .0013 degrees, but at least he put up his own $.  But yeah, the Clinton Global Initiative was all kosher because they cared so bloody much...


Kurt, never said it would take care of it.  But it certainly demonstrates that he isn't anti-NPS as many here have claimed. And I dare guess that is far more than anyone else here has contributed to reducing the backlog.  If I recall you said you had something like 2 million readers.  If each of them contributed the same you would have the backlog paid off more than ten times over.  But then, most of them won't even put up the ten bucks to keep you going.  


Donate Popup

The National Parks Traveler keeps you informed on how politics impact national parks and protected areas.

Become a sustaining member.

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.