You are here

Traveler's View: Psst! Our National Parks Are In Danger

Share

Park advocates need to rise up in support of the National Park System/NPS

During the past six months, the outlook for the National Park System has grown decidedly darker than it had been. Threats to the system's natural resources have grown with the Trump administration's attacks upon environmental regulations, proposed staffing cuts will be numbing if implemented, and there's a heightened prospect of creeping privatization.

Today, in the wake of the National Park Service's 2016 centennial and a record visitation of more than 330 million to the parks, there's an ominous trend of actions by the administration, which has a GOP-majority Congress to push them through, that would negatively impact the parks.

  • The president's budget proposal calls for a $1.5 billion cut to the Interior Department, and a nearly $400 million cut to the National Park Service budget. Though the proposal is likely dead upon arrival, will park proponents in Congress be able to block any cuts made by appropriators?
  • President Trump has directed the Interior Department to review, and possibly rescind, regulations pertaining to oil and gas drilling in units of the National Park System.
  • The administration is looking to expand offshore energy development, something that could impact national seashores.
  • In the coming weeks, there's the possibility that Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke will recommend changes in 27 national monuments that the president told him to review for their appropriateness.
  • Interior Secretary Zinke has said he wants to turn management of campgrounds on public lands over to private companies, saying the Park Service is good at cleaning toilets, but not running campgrounds. What else might he be thinking of privatizing? Will he be open to pitches that the parks need more lodging? What is his reorganization plan for the National Park Service?
  • President Trump wants Congress to repeal the Clean Water Act of 2015, which governs which streams and lakes are protected by the Clean Water Act of 1972. Currently, according to the National Parks Conservation Association, "(M)ore than half of our 417 national park have waterways considered 'impaired' under the Clean Water Act, meaning they do not meet healthy water quality standards for activities like drinking, fishing and swimming."

Frequent readers of these pages are well aware of many, if not all, of these issues. But not everybody is.

In June I had the opportunity to stand in for Dr. Alfred Runte in Zion National Park to address groups from Tauck Tour's Spirit of The Desert: The National Parks of the Southwest tour, a 10-day trek through Arches, Canyonlands, Bryce Canyon, Zion, and the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park organized with the help of Ken Burns and Dayton Duncan. My talk revolved around the many issues confronting the national parks today: Underfunding by Congress, extremely low morale, privatization, worker harassment issues, the maintenance backlog, crowding in the parks, and more.

Surprisingly, these issues were news to more than a few of those in the audience.

Park advocates need to be discussing these issues more often, and to an increasingly larger network of friends and associates. Congressional representatives should be reminded -- often -- of what the national parks mean to America and Americans. Letters are good, phone calls can be better, face-to-face the best. 

Share NationalParksTraveler.org with your friends so they can stay on top of issues confronting the National Park System, sign up for our weekly e-letters so you don't miss a story, and make tax-deductible donations to support the work of the Traveler and the National Parks Conservation Association, a great ally of the parks.

Make no mistake, these are trying times for the National Park System. 

Featured Article

Comments

Nevermind. Message deleted.


Casey,

Very well said!! 


you can also visit our Nature Parks Slovenia
https://natureparksslovenia.com/

Reply


Ecbuck is sorely wrong again.  Propbably on many but definitely about proper regulation does keep people safer, otherwise why bother?  Just like the Admin is rolling back the safeguards against Wall St., or increased safety to prevent another Deepwater oil spill, these things were made to increase safety.  Some prefer to live less safely so they can get more money, but that just shows you their priorities.


I'm wrong argalite?  Did regulations stop the Flint Michigan incident?  You must have a different news feed than I.   There is nothing wrong with "proper" regulation though I would bet our definition of what is propert would conflict.  In my mind, if a regulation provide little benefit relative to its cost it isn't proper.  The ozone regs referred to earlier is a prime example.  If 100 PPB is OK, why would you want to push the regulation from 75 PPB to 70PPB.

And yes, some us prefer to live "less safely".  In fact, virtually all of us make a decision to live less safe every day.  We get in our cars, we fly in airplanes, we eat unhealthy foods, we engage in risky recreation, including going to our National Parks.  We each make our own individual decisions of what risks we are willing to take in order to gain the rewards of money, social life, recreation et al.  And that is the way it should be. 

 


Wrong, yes. What about the regs I mentioned that this administration has already messed with?  Lets use the examples I used, instead of yours.  How about another?  Okay lets talk about lead in bullets instead.  Mr. Zinke pulled the regs to stop using lead to protect carrion eating birds.  Not because he cares about birds, but money.  Not my priorities at all.


Wrong, yes.

Wrong about what?  What statement have I made that is "wrong".


Well argalite appears to have run from his "wrong" accusation so now lets grant his wish and talk about lead ammunition as it is a perfect example of how bad the process of making regulations is.

Nobody disputes that Condors (and other birds) have issues with lead poisioning.  Many thought it was due to lead ammunition (despite the absense of direct evidence).  In 2007, lead ammunition was banned in the "Condor Corridor".  In 2013, taking a page from the AGW cult playbook, the Fish and Wildlife service withheld evidence that the ban had had no material impact on the levels of lead in the condor population.

Why did they withhold that information?  Because at the time, the California legislature was considering an outright ban for the entire state, which lacking this important information, was passed.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/2/lead-ammunition-ban-passe...

Now, with a total ban in place what has been the result. Nothing.  In fact, if anything lead levels were higher after the ban.

https://www.fws.gov/cno/es/CalCondor/PDF_files/2015_Annual_HMNWRC_Condor...   page 32

So what do we have.  Legislation/regulation implemented under false pretenses having absolutely no positive effect and leading to a doubling of the cost of ammunition.  But hey, all the enviros got to feel warm and fuzzy.  Unfortunately this seems to be the rule rather than the exception.  

 

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.