You are here

UPDATE: Congresswoman Pelosi Asks National Park Service To Deny Alt-Right Rally Permit

Share

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi wants the National Park Service to withdraw a permit for an alt-right rally at Crissy Field at Golden Gate National Recreation Area/NPS

Editor's note: This updates with statement from Golden Gate NRA acting General Superintendent Cicely Muldoon.

National Park Service officials, cognizant of concern over a "prayer First Amendment" event at Golden Gate National Recreation Area, are reviewing the situation and will decide in the coming week whether to let the event proceed.

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi has asked the Park Service to withdraw a permit for the alt-right rally scheduled for August 26 at Crissy Field, part of Golden Gate National Recreation Area in San Francisco.

“I am deeply alarmed by the hateful and dangerous nature of the event, its timing so soon after the horrors in Charlottesville, and the serious questions over whether the National Park Service is at all equipped to ensure public safety during a white supremacist rally," the Democrat said. "The NPS should reevaluate its decision and its capacity to protect the public during such a toxic rally.

"We must wonder, where is the decision to permit a white supremacist rally in a national park being made? At the National Park Service? In the Department of the Interior? Or under guidance from the White House?," she added.

Thursday evening Golden Gate's acting general superintendent, Cicely Muldoon, issued a statement acknowledging the concerns.

We have heard and take very seriously the concerns expressed by the public and elected officials regarding the proposed August 26 Patriot Prayer First Amendment event at Crissy Field. Our highest priority is to ensure public safety, while honoring our obligation to uphold one of our nation’s most cherished Constitutional rights, the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

We are guided by the Constitution, the law, longstanding court precedent, and National Park Service policy, which tells us we must be deliberative and not preemptive in our decisions related to First Amendment gatherings. Golden Gate National Recreation Area and the U.S. Park Police are closely coordinating with other federal, state and local agencies to ensure a robust plan is in place before we issue a final permit.

We want to thank everyone for expressing their heartfelt opinions and valid concerns. Anyone interested in expressing their opinion may do so by writing us at [email protected]. We are reviewing all comments, but we are not able to respond to everyone due to the large volume we are receiving.

We will make a final determination on the permit within the next seven business days based on the thorough public safety review. We will make a public announcement of our decision at that time.

The Park Service in the past has allowed rallies by the Ku Klux Klan at Gettsysburg National Military Park in Pennsylvania. Early last month such a rally brought several hundred armed militia members to Gettysburg to rally in support of the park's Confederate statues and symbols. No violence broke out, but one of the militia members shot himself in the leg.

Rep. Pelosi, though, didn't think it prudent to allow for such a rally at Crissy Field.

“Perhaps those making the decision did not know that Crissy Field is a place where families gather, where tourists visit, and the community comes together. Free speech does not grant the right to yell fire in a crowded theater, incite violence or endanger the public in any venue," she said.

Comments

 but an observation.

 

And of course a false one with its usual baseless accusations.  My words "I condemn the bigotry, hate and violence on both sides."  How you can twist that into identifying with and defending Nazis is beyond me. 


You don't get it?  What bigotry or hate was there on the side fighting the white supremacists?  Yeah I get that the Antifa guys are basically a collection of anarchists looking to cause mayhem, but they are distinctly not racist.  You also parrot Trump's line about "both sides" (although he said "many sides") and emphasize the idea that one side had a permit to march, when there was plenty of stuff that occurred well outside of parameters of the rally permit. 

 

"Both sides" is what I referred to as placing both actors in a morally equivalent position.  It's a false equivalency.  You look at how Trump's statement about "many sides" got basically no support among anyone in a leadership role, including his own VP and now even Steve Bannon, who basically called the Unite the Right people "a collection of clowns".

 

The organizers knew that a violent response would probably happen.  Heck, I'm pretty sure they were counting on it.


What bigotry or hate was there on the side fighting the white supremacists?

Throwing punches and rocks isn't hateful?  Spraying a fire extinguisher in someone's face isn't hateful? Throwing urine and excrement isn't hateful?  Is this not bigotry and hate?:  https://www.facebook.com/RMBTP/photos/a.196831133707859.50433.1667922367...

 


Nope.  Those things are covered by the violence.  I wouldn't call that hate.  Referring to those violent actions as hate only serves to deflect from the fact that one group was espousing Klan, Nazi, and various white supremacist views.  It gives them a moral equivalence that just isn't there.

 

There was one side going around with torches trying to intimidate people at a church service.  Look up what "blood and soil" (blut und boden) mean.


The violence was instigated by the Antifa people - watch the video.  To deny those acts are ones of hate or that that flyer isn't bigoted is just naive or intentional denial.  Both sides should be morally condemned but if you ask me who is more dangerous, a bunch of ignorant white supremisists or a group of facist that want to shut down the rights to freedom of assembly and speech, I would definately pick the later.

 


Personally I find the guy who plowed his car into a group of nonviolent protesters to be the most dangerous, but that may just be me.  You can find your "evidence" but the woman who got killed and the many who were injured certainly weren't combatants.  This was a guy looking to mow down protesters, starting with a full head of steam before hitting the first person.

 

And carrying torches, yelling out various Nazi slogans while surrounding a church service led by a black pastor?  I thought those days were over.


Personally I find the guy who plowed his car into a group of nonviolent protesters to be the most dangerous,

To Heather yes, to our society, no.  


Let me remind all involved to keep your comments constructive and don't wallow in the mud.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.