You are here

Op-Ed | Trump’s ‘Swamp Creature’ Chasing Americans Off Public Lands

Share

Published Date

December 28, 2017

Metate Arch, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument/BLM

Editor's note: The following op-ed piece by Ron Maxwell initially ran on The American Conservative website.

The American people did not vote for Donald Trump because they wanted their forests logged, bounties placed on wolf packs, national monuments reduced in size, and a resumption of the universally outlawed ivory trade.

These odious policies are the direct result of the appointment of a swamp creature positioned by the crony class to further its own narrow financial interests and agenda: Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. Thankfully the president reversed Zinke’s plans [1] for elephant trophies, calling them a “horror show,” which is what they are. But Trump recently traveled to Utah to announce the opening up of public lands [2] for commercial developers to pillage and plunder to their hearts content.

Bears Ears and Grand Staircase Escalante were first on the chopping block but Mr. Zinke has more in mind. At least eight more of our treasured national monuments, set aside for their beauty and the public’s enjoyment and use, are targeted for reduction. The Antiquities Act of 1906 gives the president the authority to set aside public lands as national monuments, and also to do the reverse. After reviewing these sites, Zinke has recommended that Trump reclassify and reduce the size of these national treasures.

No president has ever shrunk the sizes of monuments, but the Department of the Interior is filled with swamp denizens like Zinke and his deputy David Bernhardt, a former lobbyist for the oil and gas industry and big agribusiness, those most interested in using public land for private gain.

This reclassification means the acreage of the national monuments will be reduced, and the lands—some of the most spectacular scenic areas in the country—can be used for commercial development.

Unlike national parks, national monuments allow local residents and tourists alike to participate in recreational activities such as hunting, fishing, cattle-grazing, and hiking. This is why local businesses, sportsmen, and community groups tend to support keeping the monuments intact, as they provide dependable incomes for local economies, including the additions of jobs.

There is also widespread and bipartisan public support for preserving our national monuments. A new McLaughlin & Associates poll of 1,000 likely voters found that 90 percent of Americans support the creation of more monuments or at least keeping the current ones protected. Maintaining these lands also has the backing of local Native American tribes and chambers of commerce.

Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks in New Mexico is a prime example of how local areas surrounding national monuments can benefit from tourist opportunities. In 2016, tourism hit an all-time high following the monument’s mention in Lonely Planet’s “Top 10 Places to Visit” travel guide, which resulted in a 50 percent increase in visitors over the past year. The monument features petroglyph-line canyons, with thousands of Native American archeological sites, and many historical landmarks and training sites.

If the personal income of those who live near the Organ Mountains can increase by 42 percent, community involvement in supporting national monuments can lead to economic prosperity throughout the country.

Nonetheless, Secretary Zinke has recommended reclassifying Organ Mountains Desert Peaks for oil drilling and mining.

Gold Butte National Monument features significant cultural, historical, and natural treasures: thousands of Native American artifacts, historic mining and pioneering artifacts, rare and threatened wildlife, and dramatic geologic features. Broad and deep local support is a principal reason for its designation, which, in turn, has benefitted the community greatly.

Gold Butte also encourages tourism and increases expenditures for local businesses. An economic study conducted by Applied Analysis found that if only 10 percent of new visitors decided to spend one night in Mesquite, Nevada, the total economic impact for the community would be $2.7 million per year. Think about what that could mean if visitors were to spend the week.

Nevertheless, Secretary Zinke proposes that Gold Butte National Monument should be opened to “traditional uses,” including mining and drilling.

Aside from their captivating scenery and cultural and historical sites, monuments already provide an economic boost for nearby communities without risking damage to their environments. Additionally, their archaeological sites are a link to our prehistoric past and a vital tether to Native American cultural history.

Secretary Zinke’s misguided policies are toxic for local communities and even worse for American economic prosperity. President Trump knows business, but he also understands the need to protect these lands and the local economies they serve. He is wise to question the plans of his swamp creature and should continue to do so.

Ron Maxwell is writer and director of the award-winning film Gettysburg.

Related Stories:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Alfred you have a point, I agree that population growth and all it entails is the root cause of the problem.  However I do think your point about trying not to make a difference based on the best science available, is a cop out. To support the positions of the current administration is not helping. To compare it to the previous 8 years and the people appointed to head our government agencies by President Obama is wrong in my view. I think it is important to try, be it in our personal lives, or in our support of good policy making, to make the effort to do better, the alternative only makes things worse.  I find that in my own 78 years now, much good has happened, but the demagogery of our current President and some members of Congress is, in my opinion, extremely destructive. 


Thanks for some words of wisdom, Ron.


I don't know what you are reading Alfred, because climate change predictions seem be going as predicted, in the general sense that each year is gettin warmer.  More fires, more droughts, yes, predicted and happening.  Predictions in changes of phenology is evident as well, and many more things too lenghty to put here.


"Don't worry about Al - he still reads, but I'm uncertain when he last studied, taught, or published. He did a fine book once."

Ditto, Rick, for all of you people who continue to believe in the Party Line. A prediction? I can make lots of predictions. That doesn't mean any will be coming true. It's hardly Rocket Science to say that the Earth is warming. It's been going on for 15,000 years. Live near the Finger Lakes? The Great Lakes? The Columbia River? All were formed by melting ice.

You want to stop the melting? How? You're not God. You're not even in the league of saints. Scientists now, is it? But who are scientists? As many get it wrong as get it right. CO2 is up--and I will grant it is way up. The point is: In the past, living plants and the oceans absorbed the excess. If we just "reduce" CO2, how do we reduce the problem of disappearing forests and polluted oceans?

Failing in that, the Powers That Be invented a totally insoluable problem--climate change. And you know what? They're getting rich. I am sure Al Gore truly agonzies over the problem when flying his private jet and making "predictions" now that he is a billionaire.

Fine, but keep your high-flying, prediction-a minute hands OFF my public lands. Put your windmills where you can see them--not just where the public is forced to bear all of the costs, from a lost biology to a constant flood of subsidies that merely continue draining the middle class. Prediction: When the middle class finally comes to realize how much they have "lost" to all of the guaranteed loans and kickbacks--even while paying higher and higher rates for electricity--there will be no Republican or Democratic Congress. The whole bunch will be thrown out of office.

Not, right? It's never going to happen that way. The wonderful thing about holding power is that you get to make the rules. And you get to make things up. "97 percent of scientists agree with me on climate change!" Well, they would have to, would they not? It's been going on for 15,000 years. The question should rather be asked this way. Mr. Gore, other than by destroying my public lands, what do you intend to do about it? Reduce population? Save the Amazon rainforest? Tell God he screwed up in making so many deserts in the first place? (Or should I be saying she screwed up?) Whoever screwed up, there's nothing you can do about it. And that goes for Big Al, too.


Things are going as predicted?  You aren't paying very close attention Argalite.  Is the polar ice cap gone? Are the polar bears gone?  Has the rise in temperatures been anywhere near the predictions? Has there been an end to snow?  And no there hasn't been more drought, more and more severe hurricanes.

 


Yes, not the fine predictions, but the loose ones like more drought (California?) more fires (California?) phenological changes.  No one has predicted the polar ice caps or polar bears to be gone at this time, nor does anyone predict the end of snow.  Where do you get this stuff?  Certainly not on any UN climate science pages.


Hey Al, take a pill


Argalite:

 

Your nay-sayers are counting on you not looking around. I lived in Alaska for five years and never had a doubt that climate was changing in a rapid and negative manner.

 

Examples: https://www.fastcompany.com/40402835/before-and-after-photos-show-how-ho...

 

https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock/science/retreat-glaciers-glacier-nat...

 

https://www.sciencealert.com/climate-scientists-release-unretouched-phot...


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.