You are here

NPCA: Ten Days To Comment On Energy Development Near Carlsbad Caverns Too Short

Share

Published Date

April 21, 2018
Main entry to Carlsbad Caverns National Park/NPS

The BLM should have allowed for more than 10 days for the public to comment on a proposal to open areas near Carlsbad Caverns National Park to energy development, according to NPCA/NPS

A ten-day window given by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management for the public to comment on plans to lease nearly 200 parcels near Carlsbad Caverns National Park for energy development is too short, maintains the National Parks Conservation Association.

"A miniscule 10-day comment period does not provide any realistic opportunity to examine such impacts or for community members and stakeholders to meaningfully weigh in," Ernie Atencio, New Mexico program manager for NCPCA, said Friday. "The unique and world class underground chambers were why Carlsbad Caverns was first protected as a national park site in the 1920s and why we will continue to fight to defend this special place.

"The BLM must seriously weigh the many non-drilling uses of shared landscapes, including the protection of the ecological, cultural, geological, recreational and scenic attributes near Carlsbad Caverns and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks that are critical to supporting the immediate and long-term integrity of these special places," he said.

According to the park advocacy group, the BLM is considering for lease lands up to within one mile of the park's boundary, and many within sight of Carlsbad Caverns, a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

"Research is still being conducted on the network of caves both inside and outside the boundaries of Carlsbad Caverns and the potential impacts that oil and gas development may have on the intricate and delicate systems," the group said. "This massive lease sale by the BLM adds to a growing list of leases occurring near national parks, which since the start of 2017 has included parcels auctioned Dinosaur National Monument and Great Sand Dunes National Park, and considered near Zion National Park, Theodore Roosevelt National Park, Hovenweep National Monument, and others."

“Oil and gas development and national parks can coexist when the federal government works with communities to avoid conflicts – but this has not been the case under the Trump administration," said Mr. Atencio. "This lease sale highlights a missed opportunity for the BLM to undertake an inclusive energy planning process to achieve the goals for the parks and the industry.”

Comments

Agreed, Mr Painter.


I've been working with NEPA planning documents for 20+ years now and have never encountered a measly 10-day comment period. Period! Projects like this should have minimum 30 days, if not 45 days or even 90.

Ryan Zinke = Teddy Roosevelt? Ha!


Edited a typo, which changed the time stamp, lol.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.