Drugs, not a bear, killed a Tennessee man who headed into Great Smoky Mountains National Park last fall to poach ginseng roots, according to the autopsy results.
Unfortunately, park officials decided in September that a bear believed to have fed on William Lee Hill, Jr.'s body might have attacked and killed him, so they killed it.
Hill had gone into the park last September 7 to hunt for ginseng, a high-priced root used by some as a traditional home medicine. Prices can go as high as $800 a pound for ginseng. While the root can be collected outside the park, it is illegal to do so inside the boundaries.
The man's body was found September 9 in the woods about 2 miles north of Cades Cove and about a half-mile from the Rich Mountain Road. When searchers found his body, which had signs of being fed on by predators, they also encountered a black bear that was acting aggressively towards them.
Since it wasn't known whether the bear had killed Hill or fed on his body, a decision was made to sedate the bear and place a GPS radio collar on it and let it go pending further information, park staff said at the time. The next day, park staff, in discussions with Superintendent Cassius Cash, decided to destroy the bear. Park staff announced on September 16 that the bear was killed that morning near where Hill's body was found.
The effort to kill the bear was complicated, requiring five shots over three days.
"The biologists spent several days tracking the bear and were consistently challenged by weather, terrain, thick vegetation, and the elusive behavior of the bear," park spokeswoman Dana Soehn told the Traveler in October. "The bear was located on the second day of tracking in a thick stand of rhododendron, and a biologist did attempt to shoot it, but the shot was not lethal. Three days later, park staff successfully located and euthanized the bear via gunshot (four shots)."
A necropsy on the bear indicated that it was not in a weakened condition and desperate for food. Its teeth were in good shape, and its belly was "full" of acorn meat," noted the pathologist, who made no mention of human remains in the stomach.
Park staff said Monday that they recently had received the autopsy report on Hill, and pathologists had determined that he had died of accidental methamphetamine intoxication.
"An autopsy revealed extensive postmortem animal predation, but no findings of antemortem/perimortem trauma (i.e. Mr. Hill was not attacked by a bear)," the report added.
Great Smoky is home to an estimated 1,500 bears. Very few bears exhibit aggressive behavior towards humans. Wildlife biologists and park rangers work hard to prevent bears from becoming food-conditioned or habituated to high-use areas. Out of an abundance of caution for the park's 11 million park visitors, park staff implement aversive-conditioning techniques and, on rare occasions, euthanize individual bears that pose a threat to visitor safety.
Comments
This bear did nothing wrong. The story said the bear had acorn meat inside not human flesh. The bear was innocent, it was another meth head that caused it. Until of course a man comes along that obviously can't aim, and injures the bear.. and takes days to put it out of his misery. Stupid people!!
So the best died for nothing but being a bear. Some of us are so quick to judge one another (animals inc.) That bear was in his habitat where he should be allowed to do what bears do and because some tweeter died , doing something illegal , its the bears fault ? Smh
The fact that they had a hard time tracking the bear,even with a collar, should have been there first clue this bear was not aggressive but was trying to evade them. And to take so many trys to as they say "destroy" the bear. Killing is killing destroy is semantics, senseless loss of life, the bears not the dirt bag ginseng poacher! He should have used some of the ginseng to get off meth!
It might be self enlightening for some of you to go back and read your original comments on this story: https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2018/09/rangers-kill-black-bear-mi...
The deceased man's friend is dead as well?
What a tragedy. So their idea of solving the problem. Is to go into the woods, happen across the first bear that "acts aggressively" (because apparently bears are supposed to welcome humans graciously) and kill ill it to say THAT was the Same beat that may or may not have killed the man? This is wildlifeanagamtn? That bear just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time since obviously they were just looking for a scapegoat to kill and make people feel safe with zero evidence. Kill kill kill. And the bear suffered for days. Disgusting.
Really, I suspect that the methamphetamine ingestion was not accidental. The death may have been an unintended consequence, but the use itself was intentional
"The effort to kill the bear was complicated, requiring five shots over three days. "
What?? How many employees to accomplish that screw-up? Just no excuse. If weather was problematic they could have waited; this Bear was apparently not a clear and present danger.