So far the National Park Service leadership has overlooked calls that Grand Canyon National Park be closed/Rebecca Latson file
Grand Canyon National Park remained open Saturday, days after the National Park Service's leadership team "supported" the park's closure due to the coronavirus pandemic and despite calls from local government and health officials that it be closed and internal recognition that the pandemic "is on a scale that we have never seen before."
As parks from coast to coast -- from Muir Woods National Monument and Yosemite in California to Yellowstone in Wyoming and New Bedford Whaling National Historical Park in Masschusetts -- either closed or greatly restricted visitor access, the decision to keep open Grand Canyon and Zion national parks, two destinations particularly popular for spring break, stood out.
"They're scared for their health and the health of the community and visitors," Kevin Dahl, Arizona's senior program manager for the National Parks Conservation Association, said Saturday, referring to the Grand Canyon park employees and South Rim residents he's talked with. "They wonder why hasn't it closed down when other national parks have closed down?"
Top Park Service officials, from the Intermountain Region's director who oversees Grand Canyon to David Vela, the deputy director who is the Park Service's de facto director, agreed with Grand Canyon's acting superintendent decision to close the park, according to a Wednesday evening email sent to Grand Canyon employees.
"Currently, the park has closure support from the (Grand Canyon) superintendent, regional director, and NPS director, as well as the Coconino County Board of Supervisors, the Navajo Nation, Tusayan Chamber of Commerce, and the Tusayan Fire Department," reads the email obtained by the Traveler.
Despite that support, though, the closure order has not been forthcoming.
Grand Canyon National Park still is popular with visitors, as this photo from March 26 shows/Slim Woodruff.
On Thursday, the Coconino County Board of Supervisors, whose county contains the national park, wrote Interior Secretary David Bernhardt directly, asking him to shut Grand Canyon down. That night, in a system-wide conference call, Vela along with Rob Wallace, the Interior Department's assistant secretary for fish, wildlife, and parks, praised Park Service employees for their dedication and assured them their "health and safety ... is a top priority."
Vela also mentioned without details that some Park Service employees have contracted COVID-19, adding that they reportedly were doing well.
"We send them our best wishes, and share your concern for their ongoing health and well-being," he said. "We are working with the public health staff to follow rigorous guidelines to protect you and our park places. Your safety and that of our volunteers and park employees are our top priorities. I want to thank you for the fortitude that you have all shown."
Keeping national parks open has been a priority of the Trump administration, and Secretary Bernhardt earlier this month waived all park entrance fees and encouraged visitors to get out into the fresh air of the park system. While individual parks have grappled with how best to operate during the pandemic, with more and more closing entirely, Interior officials believe the Park Service has developed the model for managing the public and the pandemic.
During the all-employee conference call, Wallace said the view from Interior was that "the best practices for how to respond to this pandemic rest with the National Park Service."
"In talking to the White House and other cabinet level agencies, it's also become the model that has been used throughout the federal government. People here are thinking about you, thinking about parks, thinking about how to manage forward our knowledge in the federal government," the assistant secretary added.
Not everyone in the workforce agrees with the messaging provided during the phone call, however.
"As the virus spread rapidly and local agencies began being proactive, our park unit has continued to downplay the seriousness of this pandemic," one park employee who asked to remain anonymous told the Traveler. "I feel that due to lack of proper management and lack of proactive response through closures, we have aided the spread of COVID-19."
"In my opinion, my park unit is not taking the COVID-19 pandemic seriously, and we are being socially irresponsible," the employee added.
Back in Arizona, Dahl said one ranger at Grand Canyon National Park expressed the view that they "were sacrificial lambs to this wrong-sided policy."
Parking was hard to come by near Yaki Point in the Grand Canyon on March 26/Slim Woodruff
Grand Canyon officials on Thursday did put in some visitor restrictions, closing the Bright Angel, Indian Garden, and Cottonwood campgrounds, and on Friday the Mather Campground was closed, as well. Also closed were the Desert View Campground, Trailer Village, and the RV and Camper Services building.
Visitors were, however, able to enjoy overlooks along the South Rim of the park.
Keeping the Grand Canyon open, and other units of the park system for that matter, could inadvertently help spread the coronavirus, as travelers will stop for gas and go into convenience stores or restaurants as they travel to and from parks. Inside the parks, such as Grand Canyon with its overlooks, visitors risk coming in close proximity with others. For many at the Grand Canyon, the first thing they do once finding a parking spot is head over to the visitor center and Mather Point to gaze down into the canyon.
"Any gathering is bad, and people who are being forced to work, it's really bad," said NPCA's Dahl. "If they (NPS and DOI) don't take the appropriate action, then they're not serving, not only the employees, but the public."
On Friday, Coconino County officials tried again to get the park to close down, writing to Grand Canyon acting Superintendent Mary Risser with a plea that the park be closed.
"We are writing with extreme concern for any decision to keep the Grand Canyon National Park open in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic," reads the letter signed by the chairwoman of the Coconino County Board of Supervisors and the director of the county's health and human services department. "Our County Health and Human Services Department is advising all residents and tourists to practice social distancing and implement appropriate public health measures to help contain and mitigate the transmission of COVID-19.
"We encourage our federal partners to model that same behavior for the public health of the county."
Despite those pleas, the official Park Service position Saturday was that the proper health assessments haven't been completed in regard to the threat Grand Canyon National Park may or may not pose.
"We are working within the local and the State of Arizona's Health Department's as well as the CDC's guidelines, and from what I understand they have not changed their guidance for Grand Canyon National Park nor has the State Health Department asked for any change," said Alexandra Picavet, the Park Service's acting chief spokesperson.
The Park Service employee who reached out to the Traveler not only pointed to the decision for their park to remain open despite county orders that residents stay home -- "If everyone is supposed to be at home, why are we encouraging people to visit and violate the order/law?" -- but also said staff lack the proper protective equipment to stay safe when contacting visitors.
While restrooms and trash cans are closed, they still presented health problems.
"As the weekend approaches, the trash will start to pile up next to and on top of the trash receptacles, leading to animals scavenging, and overall filth," they said. "There are no water sources or hand sanitizer for people to use after they all touch the door handles of the closed restrooms. I sat at one restroom area for approximately 30 minutes and every person who came into the parking lot went to the restrooms and tried the door handles. If there was one infected person in that group, now hundreds have been exposed."
Staffing also was becoming a problem as sickness is depleting ranks, the employee said, adding that "We didn't have sufficient staffing before COVID-19."
Such issues would be tackled by the Park Service leadership, Mike Reynolds, the agency's acting deputy director for operations, told those listening in to Thursday night's employee conference call.
"I want you to know, we are sensitive to the concerns we are hearing from the field and we are trying to get answers," Reynolds said. "I won't give up if you don't give up. If you are not getting the right answers, the team will not quit until we get them out the best we can."
Comments
In response to the earlier comment by Robert George about the health hazards of large amounts of human wastes and residues tightly concentrated in small areas around roadside attractions, this is not a trivial issue. Yesterday, the "Mother Jones" website posted a relevant article (https://www.motherjones.com/food/2020/03/the-surprising-history-of-the-w...) on the origins of this COVID-19 pandemic and the entrenched cultural forces that made it inevitable. There is already evidence that not only humans can be asymptomatic or seemingly asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19. There is now increasing evidence that the virus is being passed back and forth between human carriers and their pets here in the United States. These factors have a number of important implications.
First, I have repeatedly condemned the practice of people bringing their pets to the parks due to the impact of domestic diseases, primarily distemper but not limited to distemper, that are brought into parks by visitors' dogs, cats, and whatever. The most dramatic example of what these diseases can do to the wildlife has been the countless litters of wolf pups that have been decimated by the resulting outbreaks of distemper in Yellowstone alone. These infections, by themselves, have been severe enough to actually change the genetic mix of the Yellowstone wolf population, which we know because of the intensive study of wolves in Yellowstone. What we don't know is the extent of the hidden toll on other species and in other parks. Coyotes, foxes, and perhaps many other species, may be impacted by infections that are ultimately caused, at least to a great extent, by pets being brought into the parks, pets that may now be carrrying COVID-19.
Second, although few peole are going to want to hear it, the practice of people leaving their homes to go out and walk their pets may pose previously unrecognized risks. Pets use these walks as opportunities to relieve themselves, leaving both urine and solid wastes that cannot be completely retrieved. These residues stay warm and moist far longer than any droplets resulting from coughs or sneezing; other animals, including but not limited to other pets, come by and sniff or otherwise inspect these residues; and a transmission path for whatever such pets or other animals might be carrying is formed. Pets, even pets that have never been in close contact, can thus at least theoretically transmit an infection, potentially including a COVID-19 infection, from the pets and humans in one household to the pets and humans in another, perhaps with multiple pets or other animals acting as intermediate hosts along the way. And, pet or other animal wastes don't even have to be involved. That labradoodle across the street is always fun to pet; he always brings you his soggy tennis ball to throw; and, no matter how far into the brush along the creek you throw it, he always brings it back, even soggier, for you to throw again.
Third, that aforementioned article on the "Mother Jones" website discusses both the origins of the pandemic and the cultural drivers behind it and, frankly, some of it sounds too close to home and too familiar. Eating the wildlife, as bush meat or often called camp meat in our own country, is practiced in many places; but, the article indicates that it's not as common in China as some might suspect. The article quotes a 2014 study finding that it's "largely regional" with "83 percent" of the residents of somewhat backward Guangzhou eating the wildlife in the previous year and only "5 percent" in better educated Beijing partaking. I, myself, have posted, right here on NPT, about how even the traditional hunting and eating of wildlife is really dying out even in America. But, the article also cites sources claiming that eating cats, bats, rats, civets, snakes, dogs, bear bile, and endangered pangolins were never really "traditional habits" for any but a decadent minority of Chinese and that only more recent vigorous promotion by profit seeking business interests have made eating rare or exotic wildlife "fashionable" as a "conspicuous, thrill-seeking display of wealth" and "a status symbol" among the newly rich. The article quotes one Chinese source as saying "Eating exotic species is about people showing on social media that they are cool." I'm struck by the similarity with what is going on here in the United States, where a now discredited political lobbying group and a handful of weapon manufacturers and outfitters have used slick adveretising to so lopsidedly dominate our domestic conversation.
But, none of this changes the public health dangers of these behaviors, either in Asia or here. The article warns, "Of the 30-plus pathogenic diseases discovered in humans in recent decades, three-quarters are of animal origin." It cites one study estimating "700,000 viral pathogens in the animal kingdom have potential to infect humans." HIV, Ebola, SARs, COVID-19, Swine Flu, Bird Flu, West Nile, Bubonic Plague, and Lyme Disease are all relevant examples. I have posted, right here on NPT, about the origins and dangers of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in our deer and elk. The prion pathogen for this disease is very closely related to the pathogens for other human degenerative TSEs and can jump to humans who, again, choose to eat the wildlife. For the usual suspects who will claim that I am advocating veganism, I feel obliged to add, as a cattleman in temporary retirement and a brand still active, that the article also states that "Disease occasionally leaps from domesticated animals to people, but the long history of contact with livestock, along with modern food safety regulations, makes the likelihood of those outbreaks quite low."
...just sayin'.
I live and work at the Grand Canyon. I noticed a great deal of cars comming from California, which has many confirmed cases of corona virus. Is it hard to figure out that the travelers are putting the residents in harms way? I guess the travelers don,t care about our safety, just there good time. You visitors to the Canyon shouldbe ashamed of your self!
To the would-be travelers here...PLEASE STAY HOME. Would you want thousands of people from all over the country visiting your home, workplace, grocery store, DURING A PANDEMIC? Not only has the government asked this of you, why would you endanger somebody else for a trip that is not even necessary?
Some businesses are staying open here because people keep coming. The poor people working here are being exposed to this every day. If you don't care about yourself, think about the people who are working here and their families.
As of today, at least one resident is confirmed to have COVID-19. Another post on here suggests a tourist caught COVID-19 at Grand Canyon.
CLOSE THE PARK
STAY AWAY FROM GRAND CANYON,
STAY AT HOME, IT'S A GLOBAL PANDEMIC!
Closed as of 3:08 p.m. today, no fooling. Got a press release.