You are here

Proposal To "Improve Visitor Experience" Could Open Parks To More Concessions, Higher Costs

Share

Published Date

July 16, 2020

Your national park experience could get more expensive under rule changes for concessionaires being proposed by the National Park Service/NPS file, Theodore Roosevelt National Park, Dave Bruner

In a move described as a means to improving the national park experience for visitors, Interior Secretary David Bernhardt is proposing to ease regulations for park concessionaires with hopes they'd add services in the parks and invest in facilities. Along the way, the changes also could make that experience more expensive.

The initiative was condemned Thursday as a giveaway to private businesses that want to profit from the National Park System.

"The Trump administration is plowing forward with a plan to give away America's national park assets to monied private concessionaires without a Senate-confirmed national parks director in the middle of a pandemic," said Jayson O’Neill, director of the Western Values Project that routinely criticizes the Trump administration's public lands management. "Don't let them pull the wool over your eyes. This proposal is as wrong as it is backward.”

Last fall Interior's Subcommittee on Recreation Enhancement Through Reorganization drafted a proposal that called for some significant changes to visitor services in the park system. It recommended upgrades to park campgrounds, additional services such as Wi-Fi and possibly food trucks, and suggested that concessionaires be encouraged to tackle some of the improvements by ensuring they would be repaid by subsequent concessionaires if they ever lost, or surrendered, the campground management contract.

The proposal also suggested that holders of the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Senior Pass, an $80 lifetime pass those 62 and older can buy and which provides a 50 percent discount on campground fees, face some blackout dates during busy seasons that would prevent them from that discount. 

David Vela, the acting director of the National Park Service, saw the proposed changes as a benefit to the parks and their visitors.

“Concessioners have been creating lasting national park memories for more than 125 years. The proposed changes are an important step toward strengthening our public-private partnerships and expanding sustainable, high quality and contemporary visitor services in our national parks,” he said in a release.

But the changes also could increase the cost of a national park visit. For instance, a Park Service director could decide that concessionares are in the best position to decide what the market will bear for, say, a night at the Old Faithful Inn in Yellowstone National Park or a stay in Housekeeping Camp at Yosemite National Park. Currently, Park Service staff help judge the fairness of rates charged visitors, although there is a pilot program at Yellowstone that allows Xanterra Parks and Resorts (aka Xanterra Travel Collection) to offer some lodging rooms at whatever the market will bear.

"Other rate approval methods would be used only when the director determines that market forces are inadequate to establish the reasonableness of rates and charges for the facilities, goods, or services. For example, this may occur for overnight stays at iconic lodges, food and beverage outlets where there are no easily accessible alternatives, guiding services for one-of-a-kind recreational experiences, and transportation to NPS units where there is only one way to access the site (e.g. ferry service to the Statue of Liberty)," reads the proposed rule.

The rule recognizes that "(T)he enhanced use of competitive market methods may result in increased rates and revenue with no change in expenses to the concessioner. These changes in the financial opportunity of the contract will be accounted for through contract requirements that would benefit the public using the concession services."

The proposed changes to the regulatory landscape concessionaires must negotiate came from the concessionaires, according to the proposed rule, which will be open to public comment once it's published in the Federal Register.

Examples of new services concessionaires and businesses would like to be able to bring to the parks include better Wi-Fi, bike rentals at Grand Canyon National Park, and parking management at Muir Woods National Monument.

Under the proposed rule, the Park Service director would be able to "issue a prospectus for a new concession opportunity when the director determines that a new concession opportunity is necessary and appropriate for public use and enjoyment of the unit and is consistent to the highest practicable degree with the preservation and conservation of the resources and values of the unit."

The rule changes also would allow the director to amend existing concession contracts to add new services as merited.

“We are looking at each proposed change carefully to ensure that park visitors continue to have unforgettable and affordable experiences and the change is in line with the mission of the National Park Service,” said Emily Douce, director of operations and park funding for the National Parks Conservation Association.

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

BE AWARE THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES ARE OUT FOR COMMENT NOW! READ THEM AND DECIDE IF YOU THINK THAT IT IS A GOOD IDEA THAT PRIVATE CONCESSIONAIRES CAN DECIDE HOW MUCH THEY SHOULD PROFIT FROM OUR NATIONAL PARKS. UNFORTUNATELY PEOPLE LIKE MIKE G CONFUSE THE NATIONAL FOREST SERVICE (DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE) WITH THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (DEPT. OF INTERIOR). THE CAMPGROUNDS THAT WERE CLOSED AS WELL AS THE ONE THAT HAD THE CAMPGROUND HOST WERE AT THE FOREST SERVICE SITES---SOMETIMES THEY HAVE ONE HOST FOR MULTIPLE CAMPGROUNDS AND THIS YEAR MANY OF THE CAMPGROUNDS ARE CLOSED DUE TO THE COVID VIRUS. SO DON'T BE CONFUSED BY CAMPGROUNDS WHICH FOR YEARS HAVE BEEN MANAGED THRU THE FOREST SERVICE'S CONCESSION PROGRAM AND THINK THAT IS WHAT THIS PROPOSAL IS TALKING ABOUT. THINK OF PLACES LIKE YELLOWSTONE, YOSEMITE, GRAND CANYON WITH MEGA PROPERTIES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONCESSIONAIRES TO MAKE A GOOD PROFIT BY SETTING THEIR OWN PRICES WHICH PRICE FAMILIES AND REGULAR FOLKS OUT OF THE MARKET TO BE ABLE TO STAY THERE.  READ THE DOCUMENT, PLEASE ,AND TAKE THE TIME TO SEND IN COMMENTS... PARTICIPATE IN THE FUTURE OF YOUR PARKS!


Pssst  ELK? About that shift key --- typing in all caps is making your content HARDER to read rather than EMPHASIZED.


I have been a tent camper at National Parks, and love the outdoor lifestyle. That said--I would personally support a certain amount of privitization in regards to campground services. A few examples: I've camped at several sites where showers are not available. I understand this as often being due to a remote area, limited water and utility availability; it has, however, affected my plans and length of stay on multiple occasions. Other things that I have noticed: although most NPS campgrounds do provide potable water, many existing park concessionaires do not offer ice service--which can be make or break for tent campers trying to preserve food for an additional day or two--particularly in southwestern desert heat.  I'm not a fan of supporting Amazon deliveries or wifi (perhaps on a limited, fee-for-service basis, in larger or more popular parks); I would, however, support the idea of locally-based food trucks as an additional supply option for park visitors--in my experience, most concessionaires provide limited food options at high prices; many visitors with special dietary needs (such as myself-vegan and my husband-celiac/gluten free) are shut out, and I feel that situation could be best addressed by allowing such specialty options to exist through private food truck vendors. 


Check out Canyon Lake campground in AZ. $60 per nite to pitch a tent in YOUR National Forest. 


Donate Popup

The National Parks Traveler keeps you informed on how politics impact national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.