A Utah congressman wants to create a national park out of one section of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument that President Trump broke up/BLM, Bob Wick
A congressman from Utah has introduced legislation to create a sixth national park in the state out of remnants of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument that President Trump, in a move being contested in court, broke into pieces and reduced in size.
Coming this late in the congressional session, with the General Election just three weeks away followed by a lame duck session, the measure being pushed by U.S. Rep. Chris Stewart has little chance of gaining traction and passage.
Stewart's proposal, to create an Escalante Canyons National Park and Preserve, calls for hunting, fishing, trapping, and livestock grazing within the park.
"Whether you want guaranteed access or long-term conservation, the Escalante Canyons National Park meets your goals," the Republican said in a press release. "By providing for a strong local voice in park management, the Escalante Canyons Park and Preserve is pioneering management that works collaboratively with those who live and work in this area."
The legislation (attached below) calls for the park's boundaries to "fall within the Escalante Canyons Unit of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument," though they were not specifically outlined in the measure. The bill also "codifies three separate and distinct national designations, Grand Staircase National Monument, Escalante Canyons National Park, and Kaiparowits National Monument" from the remaining lands inside the Grand Staircase monument.
The measure also calls for a "management council" of mostly state and local officials to draft management plans for the proposed park and the other monuments affected by the legislation. "Grazing within the Escalante Canyons National Park and Preserve shall be administered by the National Park Service. Federal land managers shall adhere to the management plans created by the Management Council," the measure reads.
Stewart proposed similar, unsuccessful, legislation in 2017 after President Trump broke the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument into three monuments to be known as Grand Staircase, Escalante Canyons, and Kaiparowits. Bears Ears National Monument shrank to a bit more than 201,000 acres in the Indian Creek and Shash Jáa units from its original size of 1.3 million acres.
The reduction in size of the two national monuments represents the largest reduction of any protected area in the United States, according to a study. Conservation and environmental groups immediately went to court to challenge the legality of the president's actions, litigation that continues today in the federal court system.
Early this year the administration announced plans to open lands once inside the boundaries of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments in Utah to mining and other resource-impacting uses.
There currently are five "national parks" in Utah: Arches, Bryce Canyon, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef, and Zion.
Comments
No, Sphoits, my contempt for this proposal is not completely based on my hatred of certain politicians. I admit that, as far as I'm concerned, none of these particular politicians, not Stewart, Bishop, Lee, or Hatch or any of their supporters for that matter, are worth a shovelful of pig waste; however, my disgust with this perverse proposal would actually be the same regardless of who was pushing it.
Again, regardless of who might be pushing it, it's a carefully crafted Trojan Horse, deliberately designed to carve what's left of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument into smaller and more easily undermined pieces and then give control of those remnants to "a 'management council' of mostly state and local officials to draft management plans for the proposed park and the other monuments affected by the legislation." That's a disingenuous "trick" intended as a "backdoor" to a cultish "devolution" of our national parks and not something that anyone who really values our national parks would support.
Again, for those who may not have experience with the locals in this aptly named "Dixie" region of Utah, their record on any genuine form of "conservation" is not only not good; it is extremely bad, consistently, chronically, extremely bad. And, the incontrovertible proof has been the rampant vandalism that has already been unleashed on the lands previously ripped away from Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments. This storm of cultural vandalism has defaced, to the point of complete destruction, a vast amount of artifacts and evidence of past cultures, leaving, of course, only banal reminders of the cult currently in power. Given how cultural artifacts in that part of the country have been treated so far, I can only imagine how many Navajos would get any chance to serve on a "management council" under this proposal.
Again, the proposal also dictates that federal land managers "shall adhere to the management plans" created by the locals on the management council, which is nothing more than another "backdoor" to a cultish "devolution" of our national parks.
So, Sphoits, I truly would be opposed to this proposal regardless of who proposed it or where. And, by the way, if you're not capable of easily recognizing the problems with this proposal, then you're probably also in no position to recognize what is or is not civil discussion.
Chris Stewart wants to continue to try to ruin Utah. Well, too bad for you, Chris, but it ain't gonna fly. Way too many people will always fight against your idiotic, outrageous proposals. And strangely enough, more and more new residents of Garfield County and surrounding areas are total advocates for public lands. The old-school, badly educated, clueless locals are going to lose for damn sure.
Yes, he probably does hate these politicians. And I'd say it's just fine to hate politicians who do hateful things, like crap on areas of natural beauty dedicated to ALL Americans to enrich private ranchers, miners and, oh, yeah, themselves.
Great comments. Thank you for calling a spade a spade. Sad that there is little interest from this group to truly protect these beautiful and special places. Trojan horse, indeed.
"The measure also calls for a "management council" of mostly state and local officials to draft management plans for the proposed park and the other monuments affected by the legislation"
Sound very much like an attempt to create a STATE CONTROLLED PARK that in turn will introduce a REALLY BAD precedent by establishing a "Trojan Horse", extemely biased management scheme for other NATIONAL PARKS throughout the Country...
If you can't "win" by an honest and convincing argument, there are some who will try to win by any means, including Lies and Deceit...
I sincerely appreciate all of the suportive comments on this topic; however, we all also need to remember the upcoming elections and which party is backing so many, if not all, of the politicians who trouble us and disappoint us most on these environmental and public lands protection issues. Yes, it looks, at least at this point, like Biden will defeat Trump and like democrats will retain control in the House of Representatives. But, helpful as that will be, if we do not also put democrats in control of the Senate, we will still not have the ability to pass the laws needed to adequately protect what we all love, which is our national parks and public lands. In truth, control of the Senate is a genuinely critical piece of the picture, as important as, if not more important than, just holding either the Whitehouse or the House of Representatives.
Senator Lee is not running this year, which deprives us of an opportunity to vote against him. However, in other Senate races, Paulette Jordan, an up and coming enrolled citizen of the Coeur d'Alene tribe, is trying to unseat rightwing millionaire and aging NRA diehard Jim Risch in Idaho; Governor Bullock is running to replace Gianforte's equally bad buddy, Steve Daines, in Montana; a very distinguished and respected ecologist, zoologist, conservationist, climate scientist, and professor, Merav Ben-David, is doing her best against perennial rightwing minion Cynthia Lummis in Wyoming; Hickenlooper is up against infamously extreme Trump supporter, Cory Gardner, in Colorado; and Captain Mark Kelly is trying to encourage lockstep republican Martha McSally to find a new job in Arizona.
All of these democrats currently running for the Senate are worthy of our support; but, as you might recall, Mark Kelly is married to former US Representative Gabby Gifford, who had to resign her office due to surviving brain injuries after being shot in the head with a Glock pistol by anti-government extremist and mass murderer Jared Lee Loughner. In that same attack, Loughner shot thirteen people, including Representative Gifford, and killed six of them, including a nine year old girl who was there because she wanted to meet her inspiration, Representative Gifford. What also chaps my cheeks about what happened to Representative Gifford is that, very shortly after she was shot, the local republican party brazenly and knowingly held a fundraising raffle in which the raffle prize was a Glock pistol deliberately chosen to be identical to the one that Jared Lee Loughner had used in the attack.
So, get out there and vote. Sure, we need Biden to win; but, we also need to take the Senate and, with such fine democrats running, there is no reason to not give them the support they deserve.
Excellent post, HP. Please VOTE everyone, and if you go to polls, take some friends with you. My vote for Kelly and Biden was mailed last week.
Great comments from Mike and Humphrey. Utah's national parks (Arches, Bryce Canyon, Capitol Reef, Canyonlands, and Zion) may be protected from extraction, but they still need help in reducing over-tourism. This affects Grand Staircase-Escalante as well, although to a lesser degree. These lands are the people's lands, and vailed attempts from politicians like this can't be taken seriously.