Leslie Stoltz was guiding a group to the overlook of Grand Prismatic Spring in Yellowstone National Park early one summer evening in 2020 when a black helicopter began circling the hot spring, sending a young boy into tears.
"(H)e broke into tears thinking the helicopter was a terrorist," recalled Stoltz, who described the whirlybird as "doing laps over the spring, around and around, way lower than 500 feet."
When she reached out to the park about the incident, she was told the park had no authority over aircraft in Yellowstone.
"The National Park Service was aware of this company flying over the park for an aerial filming project. Since there was no filming from the ground they were not required to have a film permit for Yellowstone," was the response Stoltz received. "I'm sorry that this activity negatively impacted your clients' experience to Yellowstone."
Two dozen parks across the country are in various stages of trying, after 20 years of opportunity, to develop with Federal Aviation Administration input air tour management plans for their parks. Yellowstone is not one of the parks required to do so because it doesn't have a large number of air tours.
"Yellowstone National Park has never had an air tour management plan since the NPS started regulating air tours in 2000, and does not plan to currently enact one," Yellowstone spokesperson Morgan Warthin told the Traveler. "No plan is required until the park exceeds 50 air tours in a year, and to our knowledge we have not exceeded 12 permitted air tours in any given year in the past decade."
While there might not be many "permitted air tours" over Yellowstone, Stoltz claims to have seen many low-flying aircraft in the park. And she is trying to rally other guides in the park, geyser gazers, and other "Yellowstone junkies" to start documenting low-flying aircraft in the park by noting the specific day and time of day that they observe a flight along with any descriptive notes.
"Photos and tail numbers would be even better," she added in an email to colleagues, "but I realize if you are with guests, it may not be possible. I wonder if it will start to show patterns?"
It was 20 years ago that the National Park Air Tour Management Act of 2000 was implemented and required the FAA, in coordination with the NPS, to set limits on overflight numbers, timing, and routes to protect park resources and the visitor experience from noise and disruption in any park with more than 50 overflights a year. After what some saw as intransigence, in May 2020 a federal judge ordered the Park Service and FAA to complete air tour management plans within the next two years for several parks.
This past February the two agencies notified the judge that they would be unable to complete plans for the eight parks with some of the highest levels of air traffic within that deadline. In explaining the delays, the two agencies cited participation by tribal governments (Canyon de Chelly, Glen Canyon, Rainbow Bridge, Mount Rushmore, Badlands), commercial jet traffic and flights to Grand Canyon National Park that are exempt from the 2000 act (Lake Mead), and the high number of current air tours and stakeholders (Hawai'i Volcanoes, Haleakalā).
At Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which successfully sued the agencies for not moving more quickly on establishing air tour plans, Jeff Ruch said park superintendents pretty much have their hands tied when it comes to airspace over their parks.
"Park superintendents have discovered their jurisdictions ends at the tree tops," Ruch, PEER's Pacific director, told the Traveler in an email Thursday. "For example, Grand Teton’s [General Management Plan] bans all overflights, but it has no means to enforce that prohibition. It is the FAA that regulates commercial air traffic generally. Notably, the National Park Air Tour Management Plans are developed by the FAA 'in consultation with' NPS, and there’s the rub."
Comments
What does it portend for America's youth that a kid sees a helicopter and starts crying?
Fear is the currency of control.
I thought the same thing. Very sad. But even sadder is no control over their own airspace for the park. It's more than sad, it's just wrong.
Can't fathom why it is so hard for the FAA, the Park Service and related parties to recognize these overflights are detrimental to the vast majority of park visitors and beneficial to so few. I recognize that businesses have a vested interest and sunk investment in these activities and I wouldn't shut existing operators at existing activity levels. But a simple " no new NPS overflights operations and no expansion of existing flights" would 1) stop the expansion of these activities, 2) eliminate them over time as operators went out of business and 3) not be punative to existing operators.
That helicopter is fitted with a gimbaled camera mount and was most likly filming a natural history documentary. There would be mo other reason for this type helicopter and camera system. So, if this was the case is it OK to share the park for 30 minutes worth of noise to te wider world? I say yes it does. This was NOT a private tour, or commercial tour, this was a film and TV production.
And then there's this ....
https://www.wired.com/story/scientists-map-yellowstones-plumbing-with-a-...
Noise and visual polution. The last thing people want to see in a National park.
That's not really the point. NPS gets no notification of when these will occur nor do they have a say over management. They just show up, and without prior notice they have no way of alerting visitors as to what to expect and can't send out safety crews in advance like they would if someone wanted to film on the ground.
If they were filming a TV documentary or such, that makes it a for-profit endeavor and even more insulting. And documentaries about nature are a dime a dozen any more. Kind of like the family I camped near who were showing a Ken Burns documentary on the side of their huge RV, complete with sourround sound - in the middle of a beautiful setting. Ironic and inconsiderate.