You are here

Share

Landing a job with the National Park Service requires some 'privilege,' according to our guest writer/Rebecca Latson file

Privilege: A Required Qualification to Work with the National Park Service

By Ashley Daffron

Graduate Student in Conservation Leadership at Colorado State University

In the breakroom, grumbling with my fellow park rangers about how expensive living outside Arches National Park was, everyone shared personal information about making ends meet. We were all childless, from upper and middle-class families, and all but one of us were white. And we all had one thing in common: every one of us had financial support to meet our basic expenses—a second job, a partner with a well-paying job, or, in my case, parents who supplemented my income. Without this support, none of us would have been able to work for the National Park Service (NPS).

You need an incredible amount of privilege to work for the NPS. I had the right combination of privilege to snag a job as a Fee Technician at Arches National Park because I had the support and resources, the right connections, and parents who could help. For many, especially people of color, this isn’t the case. The NPS has many barriers that prevent underrepresented and underprivileged groups from entering its workforce—the current hiring structure, relocation requirements, and low-paying entry-level jobs are a few. With a staff that is over 75 percent white, it is clear that the NPS must tackle these institutional barriers to remove “privilege” from its list of required qualifications.

The National Park Service workforce is more than 75 percent white, according to the annual Best Places to Work in Federal Government survey

The National Park Service workforce is more than 75 percent white, according to the annual Best Places to Work in Federal Government survey.

The NPS’s hiring process deters certain candidates. I recently heard from a colleague that he asked current rangers for advice when he applied to work with the NPS. The top answer? Learn how to use USAJobs. Most jobs with the NPS require applicants to apply through USAJobs.gov, the federal government’s hiring website. The website is anything but user-friendly. Research on the federal hiring process describes USAJobs as challenging to navigate and notes that it doesn’t provide enough search mechanisms to help applicants discover jobs that align with their interests and skills. The study found job descriptions containing over 1,500 words, and many were “‘barely comprehensible’ to an untrained reader.”

If the applicant manages to successfully navigate USAJobs, after submitting their application, they are met with competency assessments (think SAT exams) that can take up to five hours to complete. When I took these assessments, I questioned how badly I wanted this job when one of the questions required me to make a seating chart for foreign diplomats with a complex list of rules to follow. But the real question is—who is this process really weeding out?  Seen as a “learned skill, not a genuine measure of competency”, these standardized assessments are less about a candidate’s job-relevant skills and more about their ability to test well or access to the resources to do well.

If the applicant is lucky enough to land a park service job, chances are they’ll have to move to do it. For many, moving to a national park is fulfilling a bucket list item, but for others, it means leaving their community, family, support system, and even ancestral land behind. Many permanent NPS staff start their careers in seasonal positions, moving to different parks with each new position. Research has shown that for many Black adults, where they live, and their community significantly influences their self-perception. Similarly, Indigenous women are recognized as essential pillars in their communities, and moving from their communities to foreign ones is a difficult decision, one that often is not a prized choice. Within many of these underrepresented groups, community is incredibly important, and having to leave them is a significant barrier that keeps these diverse candidates out of the NPS.

National park gateway towns like Moab, Utah, can be prohibitively expensive for park staff on low salaries/Kurt Repanshek file

Many NPS positions typically require a bachelor’s degree or a few years of specialized experience, usually through underpaid internships and entry-level jobs. In my case, as an entry-level employee, I earned about $20,000 less than the livable wage in Utah. Most of my coworkers on the same pay scale, including myself, were spending almost if not a whole paycheck just on rent in Moab. Even with support from my family, this played a large part in why I left the park service after only a year. An article in High Country News described these jobs as “‘the playground of rich white kids,’ whose family support makes the low pay tolerable.” The folks who can afford to take these jobs, especially seasonal positions, get a leg up when applying for more senior or permanent positions in the agency, thereby perpetuating the privileged nature of the agency.

Privilege is the unspoken required qualification to work at the National Park Service. The NPS needs to reform its hiring process and make USAJobs more accessible to a wider audience, create better opportunities for candidates from underrepresented groups, and create entry-level positions that pay a living wage. While the agency claims it is working towards creating a more inclusive workforce, the NPS will only meet this goal once this issue of privilege is addressed.

Comments

This article bothers me. The National Park Service uses special hiring authorities, approved from OPM, to hire urban youth and minorities to permanent jobs. They have an NPS executive to review exclusively minority applications to ensure they meet qualifications. The Office of Personnel Management has even increased the pay for these entry-level permanent positions to GS-09/11 maximum rates. Pathways jobs no longer require college degrees and they go to minorities. As for the author of this article she may feel priviledged, but I assure her that many qualified applicants who happen to be male are not priviledged today. 


Conditions are so bad yet they take the job anyway.  You want higher pay and lower cost accomadations, don't work there for anything less.  If your labor is that valuable someone will pay it. Obviously the pay and accomadtions aren't the only benefit these NPS workers are getting from the job.  If having a supportive family is privledge, we need to figure out how to have more people have supportive families because that privledge is a good thing.  


I agree that USAJobs could do better at explaining what they are looking for and the tests (which to be fair are only required for certain jobs) seem to ask for irrelevant skills.  Not sure what you can do about relocation though.  As in any other line of work you sometimes move to where the job is and being a ranger means being on site and thus living nearby.  What gets me are the times I've not been considered on account of not already living in the area when obviously the plan was to move if I were selected.


We're being virtue-signaled by someone who only worked for NPS for a year? I guess National Parks Traveler has become an extension of the NPS employee Facebook group.


Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:107%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Aptos; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Aptos; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-font-kerning:1.0pt; mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}

"You need an incredible amount of privilege to work for the NPS" Only for some sectors like interpretation where people with useless degrees and limited experience compete. Or popular parks in high COLA like the author writes about. A WG10 maintenance mechanic job paying 32.48hr minimum is open in Everglades now that requires ability to do building and utility maintenance, not privilege.

 

"With a staff that is over 75 percent white" Matching the racial makeup of the US in 2010. This lagging indicator will change. Also, so what?

 

 

"The study found job descriptions containing over 1,500 words, and many were "'barely comprehensible' to an untrained reader." Good. If "untrained" refers to the field it filters the unqualified. If "untrained" refers reading ability it filters poor applicants.

 

The competency assessments the author mentions are terrible.

 

"it means leaving their community, family, support system, and even ancestral land behind" Don't take a job that moves you from those things if critical.

 

"having to leave them (home community) is a significant barrier that keeps these diverse candidates out of the NPS." The author problematizes something innate and everlasting. You can't stay home and be somewhere else at the same time.

 

High Country News described these jobs as "'the playground of rich white kids,' HCN, like NPR, lost the thread a long time ago. The point is sometimes true for seasonal interpretation though. Do rich white kids run the snowplows and garbage trucks, clean the toilets, manage the wastewater, mow the grass, etc.? Kvetching about demographics is an affectation of the privileged.

 


So many priveleged angry old white men commenting here. Hilarious...and yet disturbingly out of touch with reality.


Reducing barriers to entry for these roles is not an "enlightened racist practice" - Paying a living wage and reflecting on why those from underrepresented groups might have harder issues securing these jobs only levels the playing field so the BEST QUALIFIED CANDIDATE can get the job. By saying "The NPS should hire the best qualiifed candidates", you should be in support of efforts to reduce barriers to entry. Currently, if the strongest candidate does not have financial support (an example), they are unable to take this role and the role will go to an less qualified (but privileged) candiadate. Stop assuming any effort to enhance access is detrimental to others, it benefits us all. 



Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.