You are here

California Bans Single-Use Propane Canisters Starting In 2028

Share

By

Justin Housman

Published Date

November 26, 2024
Standard single-use propane stoves like this will soon be off-limits in California / Justin Hiousman photo

Standard single-use propane stoves like this will soon be off-limits in California / Justin Housman photo

They're ubiquitous in camp, hardware, and even grocery stores across the country, but in California, they'll soon be a relic of camping times past. They're the one-pound (ish) single-use propane canisters, usually seen in Coleman Green, but they're made by lots of other companies too. Last month, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 1280, which bans the sale of these canisters across the state, starting January 1, 2028. That lead time gives consumers and propane brands time to make the switch.

The bill was sponsored by State Senator John Laird (D-Santa Cruz), and was previously approved by the California legislature (a similar bill passed the legislature in 2022 as well). Newsom's signing made it official, though there was little doubt he would sign. 

The bill doesn't ban the sale and use of refillable one-pound propane canisters, just the disposable ones, though few campers use refillable one-pound propane canisters presently. It's estimated that Californians use at least 4 milion of the single-use canisters annually. Aftermarket options for refilling non-refillable canisters exist, but they're dangerous as the canisters aren't designed to be refilled. Most are just pitched into the trash.

The solution for campers will be to purchase refillable one-pound propane canisters, or to use the already prevalant larger portable propane canisters, that come in a variety of sizes from 5 to 20 pounds. One-pound propane canisters, like those made by the brand Flame King, are typically around $30, though they require an adapter that fits the canisters to larger tanks for refilling. Propane costs vary, but right now, it's about $2-3 to refill a propane canister, while a single-use Coleman propane canister is $9.50 at REI. 

The move to ban these canisters will save local municipalities a lot of money. California has declared used propane canisters hazardous waste, which comes with a host of cleanup requirements. According to Sierra, cities and counties pay as much as $65 per canister to dispose of them properly in waste management facilities. The canisters contain small amounts of leftover propane and if simply tossed in with the rest of the garbage at a landfill, that propane poses a serious explosion risk. 

Some localities, like Butte County in Northern California, have already moved to ban the sale of single-use propane canisters countywide, specifically because of the cost to deal with their cleanup. 

 In addition, the canisters have to be separated and dealt with in campgrounds by busy park staff, and can be a real cleanup headache in busy campgrounds. 

“For years these propane cylinders have  placed a great burden on our park systems, beaches, material recovery facilities, and local governments," said Laird in a statement. "With the signing of SB 1280 the taxpayers will no longer be responsible for cleaning up someone else’s mess. Signing SB 1280 will result in more reusable propane cylinders for consumers to refill which will lead to a cleaner and safer California.”

This law applies only to one-pound, single-use propane canisters. As of now, single-use isobutane canisters, like those used by backpacking stoves, are exempt from the law. 

 

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

The move to ban these canisters will save local municipalities a lot of money.

 

 

Yeah, no. Just like the ban on plastic grocery bags led to increased use of plastic bags in CA, this will inevitably lead to the use of MORE disposable propane canisters, or the use of MORE propane, or the use of larger propane bottles that will be similarly disposed of with MORE leftiover propane in them.

 

According to Sierra, cities and counties pay as much as $65 per canister to dispose of them properly in waste management facilities.

 

According to AJ, that's a load of bad gas.  So, the state mandates special handling of these cannisters with no scientific basis, then the locality/countyhas to comply, then the cost goes up, then the ban  is enacted.  What will they do when the 5-10-20 lb bottles start showing up  at the landfill in greater numbers (with more leftover gas in them)...PREDICTABLY?

 

Enough of this kookiness from CA.  The outmigration from CA has got to be disconcerting to any responsible public official there, but they just keep on being kooky.

 

Goodbye, California.


Those larger propane canisters are refillable. There's little reason to believe they'd appear in the same numbers as disposable canisters. I could maybe imagine people start using isobutane with smaller stoves because they don't want to deal with refilling propane, but that requires much smaller, single-burner stoves. The state doesn't profit from refillable propane canisters being sold. 


I don't see the connection to plastic bags. A ban on the single use bottles doesn't mean we'll see more of them, since there isn't a half-measure that the manufacturer can implement like "reusable" thicker plastic bags.

Reusable larger bottles are already a thing and they're MUCH less commonly thrown out becuase they were BUILT to be reusable - either by refill or exchange. People already hang onto their bigger bottles because they are reusable, so why would banning single use bottles cause them to be thrown out more? According to LR, a ban just means less expensive single use bottles that the county has to deal with, and I keep using my bigger tanks. Win-win.


The "disposable" 1 lb cannisters are also refillable, but folks don't! Why not? Think about it.

 

These bans, whether plastic grocery bags or these cannisters or confined hogs,  DO NOT AND WILL NOT change behaviors.  It's called "leakage" and it's a basic economic fact.

 

Think about a visitor to CA parks:  they cannot buy a 1 lb cannister, so they're gonna buy a 1.0001 lb bottle or 5 lbs, or even a 20 lb. bottle. Are they gonna haul it back to Illinois, or fly back with it?  Unlikely.  So, larger containers wind up stacked next to the Yosemite dumpster, or in CA landfills, many with leftover propane.

Or manufacturers will invent a "refillable" 1 lb container to out-engineer the ban.  Never underestimate Americans' ability to outwit CA's kooksters.

Sorry CA...sorry folks...you cannot ban your way out of the laws of  basic economics.

Mark my words all you Doubting Debbies!


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.