You are here

Congresswoman Bachmann Would Support Drilling For Oil In Everglades National Park

Share

Published Date

August 30, 2011

It's been nearly four years since Republican presidential hopeful Fred Thompson said he would support drilling for oil beneath Everglades National Park if there were substantial reserves there.

Well, Mr. Thompson soon left that race, but another GOP presidential hopeful says she'd do the same thing if it could be done "responsibly."

U.S. Rep. Michelle Bachmann was quoted the other day in an Associated Press story that she wouldn't automatically rule the park off-limits if oil were found beneath it.

"The United States needs to be less dependent on foreign sources of energy and more dependent upon American resourcefulness. Whether that is in the Everglades, or whether that is in the eastern Gulf region, or whether that's in North Dakota, we need to go where the energy is," she said. "Of course it needs to be done responsibly. If we can't responsibly access energy in the Everglades then we shouldn't do it."

Those comments immediately drew a reply from the Everglades Foundation.

"NRA card-carrying hunters, fishermen, waterfowlers, and other outdoors enthusiasts do not want to see oil drilling in their Everglades wildlife paradise. In addition, the Everglades is the source of fresh, clean drinking water for more than 7 million Floridians," the organization said. "Congresswoman Bachmann needs to understand that oil and drinking water do not mix.”

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

You have to love that term "responsibly," as in "Of course we will do this responsibly.  We love the Everglades."  Then, of course, we find out that the word meant nothing because, either it was not said sincerely or intelligently or, guess what, stuff does happen after all.  Then we have a Gulf oil spill type disaster under the Everglades.  People like Michelle Bachmann make themselves scarce at that time on the bare chance that folks remember what she said and decide to hold her accountable for it.  I like the Everglades Foundation quote:  "Congresswoman Bachmann needs to understand that oil and drinking water do not mix.”


"Congresswoman Bachmann needs to understand that oil and drinking water do not mix.”

There are a couple layers of subtle sarcasm in that comment, whether intentional or not.


Congresswoman Bachman and sanity don't mix, either.


You guys are a hoot.  Bachmann makes a perfectly sensibile statement and you anti-oil "environmentalist" go nuts.  Contrary to the title of the article, Bachmann didn't say she would support drilling she said she 'wouldn't automatically rule the park off-limits".  In otherwords, she wants to see all the facts and not just kneejerk reach a conclusion without consideration of all the facts as you have.  In otherwords - she is viewing the issue with an open mind not an uninformed bias.
And Bruce - I hope you are walking to work.  When you get there, let us know all the longer term effects from the gulf "disaster".


Anon -- This wasn't the first time Michelle has gone off on something of this sort.  It's part of a much larger pattern from her.  Which coal or oil company do you work for?


Lee - I never have worked for any coal, oil, gas or related company. But not surprised that would be your counter argument - attack the person not the points.  Perhaps you would like to identify some of the other things "of this sort" that Michelle has "gone off on".


Justin - I don't have any problem at all drawing a conclusion from her statement.  She would consider it after looking at the facts.  Unlike those (such as you) that dismiss it outright.  If you aren't an "environmentalist" or "against oil".  Why would you outright dismiss drilling in the Everglades without knowing anything about the proposal?  Looks like clear uninformed bias to me.


Anon,

There's nothing "sensible" about Bachmann's statement.  The word "responsibly" has no semantic value (i.e. could mean anything here), as Bruce noted, so it's impossible to make any real sense of what she is saying.
 
And your comment that the responders above are "anti-oil 'environmentalists'" sounds itself pretty "kneejerk."  (I oppose drilling in the Everglades, but I'm neither an environmentalist nor "against oil.")


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.