When It Comes to National Parks, is it an "Earmark" or Prudent Spending?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13550/13550a5dacbb3f71d6203f5b3073aad3a8d1f859" alt=""
As Congress works on the Omnibus Spending Bill of 2009, that heft appropriations catchall that funds government, critics have pointed to more than 8,500 "earmarks." But is that word truly a pejorative when it comes to the National Park System?
- By Kurt Repanshek - March 5th, 2009 3:30am