Blue Ribbon Coalition Takes Offensive On Yellowstone Snowmobile Debate

Published Date

February 20, 2006

It should surprise absolutely no one that leaders of the pro-motorized recreation Blue Ribbon Coalition are mobilizing their members to urge the National Park Service to relax guidelines on snowmobile use in Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks. After all, they have a constituency that's entitled to its opinion.
However, I have to question their beliefs that the Park Service should ease off from its position that only "best available technology" snowmobiles be used in Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks.

As testing has shown, even the "BAT" snowmobiles are dirty. Dirtier than they were envisioned, in fact. To say that's OK in a national setting would be shameful. Of course, perhaps it also signals that the industry cannot, or is unwilling, to produce a snowmobile that runs cleaner than those already out on the market.
In a story that ran today in the Casper Star-Tribune, coalition officials maintain it's "totally ludicrous" for officials in Grand Teton to require BAT snow sleds, as is the case in Yellowstone. They maintain it would harm tourism.
That's a pretty ludicrous position to me. Noisy, raucous herds of rampaging snowmobiles throttling their way through a national park setting is not going to boost tourism, it's only going to harm it.

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Add new comment

Comments

Submitted by admin on February 20, 2006 - 8:36pm.

It is one thing to point out all the problems of human interaction with the wilderness. It is time to point out the true efforts of most environmental groups and that is to limit access to our wilderness. They Skew the Reports. It is also time to come up with answers needed to alow more people to enjoy our wilderness. I now live in California after living in Jackson Hole in a Tee-Pee for three winters and did not own a car for the eight years I was there. California has some of the strongest polution laws of most states in the US and we have millions and millions of people living on top of each other. Wyoming has some of the worst and maybe the least amount pollution laws in the country and is one of the least populated states in the US, yet it is teaming with wildlife When I talk of living in Jackson Hole to people here in CA they think I am Nuts. They Like it here. Of course none of them are from here as I am, they are from some other part of the country if not from somwhere else in the world. All I hear when I go to Jackson From the "locals" is how the place has changed and they work hard to exclude as many people as they can, except for all the realtors selling over priced and over sized second homes. I wonder how many of the real local kids have moved to CA to escape what they perceive as a harsh environment. Pollution from the motorhomes and other unregulated by smog laws vehicles that enter the park have a greater effect on the wilderness than the very limited winter access Yellowstone will ever get. Up grade the Snow machines and I will still ride the old snowcoachs but I do believe the snow machines will help to keep the cost down and help more people enjoy our wilderness even if they are limited to the same roads as the rest of the 3 million people entering the park during the limited spring summer and fall days the park is open.

Submitted by admin on February 21, 2006 - 12:09am.

I live in West Yellowstone Montana, the west entrance to Yellowstone National Park. I was a Yellowstone Park snowmobile guide for two seasons. I watched the buffalo being run up and down the roads by ignorant "bubbleheads". Smoke filled the air at the gate, around Old Faithful and rangers in the pay stations had to wear respirators. On calm days the air is so fowl in town I have to leave. The noise is relentless day and night in town. Intoxicated sled-heads tear all over town spreading noxious fumes and deafening noise. I hate the machines and most of the rude speed demons who ride them. Some of the folks are nice...most are arrogent and selfish with no respect for the town's people. The powerful people in town depend on the snowmobile dollars to fuel their fancy lifestyles that are based on the idea that Yellowstone is here to provide a way to pay for everything they own or owe the bank for. They disregard the noise, smoke and pollution...many of the powerful people are MORMONS. Very sad situation and I am at a loss to understand why snowmobiles are not banned in Yellowstone and in my town of West Yellowstone. Hopefully someday soon they will be banned.....forever.

Submitted by admin on February 21, 2006 - 7:43pm.

I was hoping to get some Ideas on how to move more people through Yellowstone with less pollution. One idea I have is to use ski resort lift technology. Move them on people movers and cables. What is happening in West Yellowstone? It always looked out dated and like a goast town to me. Are the local kids moving to CA?

Submitted by admin on February 25, 2006 - 11:45am.

West Yellowstone very much exists solely through the presence of the national park. It is, in effect, subsidized by the park and the park's visitors. It's akin to Dick Cheney preaching the evils of big government while accepting pay (tax dollars) from it over his entire adult life.

Submitted by Kurt Repanshek on February 25, 2006 - 1:33pm.

I don't think casting aspersions is the answer to solving West Yellowstone's problems. As Alan points out, the town exists solely because of the park, like so many other gateways towns across the national park landscape. They exist to serve the parks with lodgings, restaurants, gift shops, etc., and to deny them a right to earn a livelihood would be wrong. Snowmobiles have long been West Yellowstone's bread and butter because they have been permitted for so long. To expect an overnight seachange is unrealistic. That said, the town is changing. Randy Roberson, who long rented snowmobiles, today offers one of the largest, if not the largest, snowcoach fleets serving Yellowstone. West Yellowstone also is home to a world-class cross-country ski trail system that draws thousands of skiers each winter, as well as the Grizzly Discovery Center, which not only saves problem grizzlies from being put down but also has a great educational mission. As Yellowstone negotiates the snowmobile issue, West Yellowstone will change accordingly. But I think snowmobiles will always be an important economic component for the town, regardless if they're banned from the park, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. If and when the town's residents get fed up with the blue smoke and snowmobilers gunning their way around the town's streets, they'll find a way to deal with it.

Add comment

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks