You are here

Talking Points...and Points of Concern

Share

Published Date

April 13, 2006

    National Park Service officials in Washington, no doubt aware of the gloomy picture the Government Accountability Office painted last week with its report on underfunding for the national park system, don't want their field employees to face the general public without answers.
    So, earlier this week the folks at HQ shipped out a memo of "Talking Points on Park Operations" that Park Service employees can bone-up on in advance of the busy summer season.
    Right from the start the memo stresses the need for straight talk regarding funding problems and how they've affected park programs and maintenance. But it quickly adds that the public should know that, "There's two sides to the story and the public should know NPS employees are innovative and creative in taking care of resources entrusted to us while providing excellent visitor experiences."

    Along with some pats on the back -- "Our satisfaction rating is over 96 percent nationally, and has remained high for years. That's a clear indicator that budgets have not reduced visitor enjoyment." -- the memo strives to get across the point that while dollars are scarce, innovation will save the day.
    "The NPS has a host of management initiatives to help keep pace with the economic realities of the 21st century. We have proven we can be effective in serving our visitors -- now we must be more efficient as well!"
    Of course, just as HQ is rolling out these talking points, some newspapers across the country have their own views on what's happening to the national park system. Over at the Kansas City Star,
an editorial yesterday came right out in the first sentence to lament that, "The National Park Service is losing a battle to protect and  preserve America's most popular natural and historic resources."
    "Given the parks' immense popularity, Congress and the president should give parks a higher priority in the federal budget," the editorial goes on to say. "The public would applaud more rangers and better park maintenance."
    In Maine, the Morning Sentinel recounted the GAO report and mentioned that the Friends of Acadia group met with the state's congressional delegation to discuss the need for more funding for staffers and land acquisition.
    Going back to the talking points memo, NPS officials in Washington believe, despite a proposed $100 million cut in their FY2007 budget, that the agency can get the job done with its current resources and a little ingenuity.
    "The NPS will do its part to keep costs down while fulfilling our stewardship responsibilities for preserving natural and cultural resources, and maintaining high visitor and citizen satisfaction and support," reads part of the memo.
    One example of being more efficient, the memo points out, can be found in Denali National Park, where officials are thinking of increasing climbing fees to help pay for the increasing costs of managing the park's mountaineering program.
    At the same time, the memo hints of the agency's desire to see volunteers come to the rescue.
    "Public support and volunteerism has been a long American tradition -- it continues to help support our national parks move ahead regardless of spending levels," it says.

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

I think that they are greatly misrepresenting that "96% satisfaction" statistic. Of course it would be hard to go to some place as amazing as Yellowstone and "not be satisfied" - but they shouldn't kid themselves that people don't notice outdated exhibits, or that it is harder than ever to spend time with an experienced Park Ranger while in the Park.

We used to hear this in the Air Force (I was on active duty for 10 years and in the Air Force Reserve for another 16 years). It's called do more with less. And it is a pernicious trend. Here again, the problem is only likely to worsen pending a great waking up by the mass confused public.

Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.