You are here

Send Mr. Pearce Back to the Oilfields

Share

Published Date

October 10, 2006

     Here's hoping that when the voters send Representative Richard Pombo back to California as a private citizen, he takes Stevan Pearce with him, for he's no friend of the national park system.
Reppearce_copy_2     Unless, of course, you want to further commercialize the parks and swing open their gates to more motorized recreation.
    Representative Pearce, you see, seems to think the park system is broken because visitation is not on a continual rise. With that mindset, I wonder what he thinks of the New York Stock Exchange?
    Anyway, while Mr. Pombo put the good Mr. Pearce in charge of the House subcommittee on national parks, he sure doesn't seem to be looking out for the the national park system. You'd think a man in his position, if he is so greatly concerned with the plight of the parks, would work harder to see the National Park Service's budget boosted to the point where at least the system breaks even.   

      Too, you'd think he'd be a member of the Congressional National Parks Caucus. But he's not. In fact, when 36 members of the House wrote then-Interior Secretary Gale Norton back in February with a request that she direct the Park Service to abandon its rewrite of the agency's Management Policies, Mr. Pearce's signature was nowhere to be found. Perhaps that's not so surprisingly when you realize that his business background is in the oil industry.
    However, this past August, shortly before Fran was going to sign the revised policies into being, his, and only his, signature was on a letter asking her to tweak the policies. Among the changes he supported was one that the Park Service get out of the wilderness business and another that it not fret so much over human-caused noise.
  Yes, the gentleman from New Mexico is not a warm friend of the park system. Let's not forget that earlier this year he appointed a "Park Visitation Working Group" that was comprised solely of groups holding an economic interest in park visitation. Not a single parks advocacy group was represented.
    And it was Mr. Pearce, in his role as parks subcommittee chair, who handpicked the witnesses for his hearing late last year into the National Park Service Organic Act. It was a telling list, too, one tilted with critics of how the national park system is being run.
    Most recently Mr. Pearce introduced legislation that, if ever enacted, could theoretically turn hiking paths through national parks into roads.
    Hell, this guy can't even gain approval from Republicans for Environmental Protection, which actually gave him a negative rating for his 2005 votes on issues pertinent to the environment.  You can learn more about Mr. Pearce's voting record at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee website.

    Here's hoping that if Mr. Pearce manages to win re-election that at least the Democrats take control of the House so he loses his chairmanship.   

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Another fox to guard the hen house. Rep. Pearce 's only goal is too solidify the wealth of the CEO's that run the recreation industry in the National Parks...the more noise and pollution the better! Right Rep. Pearce? Despite the majority of the general populace, most American's want less intrusive crap in the Parks that Pearce adovcates for. Because he (Pearce) doesn't get it, or can't read between the lines what the American citizens want-the spirit and soul of the National Parks! Since Mr. Pearce can't see this, or cares, may I suggest just throw the bum out of office. He deserves nothing and serves the American public with pure incompetence.

The majority party's leaders just hate -- HATE! -- subsidizing things that truly benefit the public at large. Witness the continual harping over the funding of Amtrak. Yet the Amtrak operating budget is mere chump change when compared to the dollars thrown away in building new highways and other pork-barrel crap (projects that destroy Nature). Same goes for the National Park System. Another good case study of the standard ploy: starve an agency for funding, then claim it's broken and must be privatized to make things right.

Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.