You are here

NPS Budget: Some Fallout

Share

Published Date

February 5, 2007

    It was just about a year ago when President Bush shipped his Fiscal 2007 budget proposal to Congress. That was the one that carried a $100 million cut for the National Park Service. Now, fortunately, that budget proposal was never enacted by Congress.
    However, while the administration is touting its FY2008 budget proposal for the Park Service, the target of the president's budget cut from a year ago is in the sights again, although to a greater extent. Of the $100 million proposed to be slashed from the agency's FY07 budget over 2006 levels, nearly $85 million was destined to come from the Park Service's construction and major maintenance budget.
    This time around that budget line is proposed to take a hit of about $114 million, according to Bill Wade of the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.
    "That's a pretty substantial decrease in the construction budget," Wade tells me, "and it looks like there will be a decline of some $24 million in land acquisition funding from 2006. That's where they're getting some of the money from the increases that they're touting."

    Wade has mixed opinions on the latest budget proposal. He says it's nice to see the Park Service's operations budget get a decent boost, and that it's nice to see that the president wants to put more rangers out in the parks.
    "I think the fact that there has been a lot of focus on restoring a lot of the annual operations capability in parks is unquestionably a good thing," he says, only to add that, "Certainly, it comes at the expense of some other things. There is a bit of robbing Peter to pay Paul."
    That said, Wade ventures that, "given the overall situation that parks face, that's probably an appropriate trade-off."
    Of course, it might not be to the parks that see proposed construction projects pushed off further into the future. Will Mesa Verde lose that museum and visitor's center Fran promised last summer? Will Apostle Islands National Lakeshore ever get the money it needs to repair and maintain its historic light stations?
    One thing about the president's budget proposal that definitely chafes Wade is the plan to try to raise $3 billion in public and private funding to buff up the park system between now and the Park Service's centennial in 2016.
    "You know, that seems to us to be another one of those examples of the increasing intent on the part of this administration in particular to continue to try to get private money to run the parks," says Wade. "We've said all along that we think that is a dangerous avenue to go down. ...I can't help but believe that it's not a good idea to keep pushing to get more private money to run the national parks. I don't think that's what the American people want."   

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Kurt, one way the Bush team proposes to raise money in the proposed spending plan is the selling of national forest land. See http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420AP_WST_Bush_Budget_Northwest.html It's the second time the Bush administration has come up with this DOA proposal. But wait, that's not all. The administration continues to suck the financial life out of the National Wildlife Refuge System, in a bid, perhaps, to prove (again) that private industry can better run the refuges. See http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007702040359

Your so damn right Gregory! My friends in the U.S. Forestry Dept say the same thing. Bush is no friend to alot of people in the U.S. Forestry Dept.

Bush is no friend of the forests -- so it's no surprise that he is no friend of the people in the Forestry Department.

Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.