You are here

Grand Teton Gets Go-Ahead on Transportation Corridors

Share

Published Date

April 18, 2007

    In a decision that will delight some, and possibly anger others, the Park Service has given Grand Teton officials the go-ahead to build more than 40 miles of multi-use pathways through the park.
    The work will be staged in phases, with planning and design for the first stretch --from  Moose to South Jenny Lake-- scheduled to take place this year with construction to follow next year.
    Twenty-three miles of pathways between the park's south boundary and String Lake Junction will be outside existing road corridors, while 16 miles of shoulder widening to create bike and pedestrian lanes will be built between North Jenny Lake Junction and Colter Bay. Another section of path, roughly 3 miles in length, will be installed along the Moose-Wilson Road from the Granite Canyon Entrance to the Laurance S. Rockefeller Preserve.
    Additionally, two sections of the Moose-Wilson Road will be realigned to restore aspen and wetlands habitat. 
      Part of the program calls for monitoring of both wildlife and visitor use, with baseline studies to be conducted this summer. Along with installing the pathways, the project calls for a study to determine the viability of a sustainable public transit system in the park.

    If you want to review the EIS and Record of Decision, click over to this site.
    The entire project is estimated to cost $45 million, followed by annual operation and maintenance costs of $558,000. The construction funds for the first phase, expected to cost under $8 million for seven miles of path, are coming out of federal transportation act funding . Park officials hope additional transportation act funding will be available for future phases of the project. 

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

You know, I biked all the way through Grand Teton and back last summer as part of my biker/hiker vacation through Grand Teton and Yellowstone. I felt about as safe as one can expect on those roads in Grand Teton and was happy that there was a shoulder at all. In Yellowstone, there often wasn't a shoulder at all (except for some small stretches here and there), and the upper loop has very narrow roads. Even there, I felt relatively safe, much safer than I do every single day biking in traffic in Washington, DC. Every day, I dodge cars, am forced to weave in and out of lanes, watch out for car doors opening up on me from any direction, dodge pedestrians lunging into the road from anywhere. The serenity I felt in the parks compared to that experience is 1 million percent different. I barely needed my breaks in the parks (except when going down a mountain pass and winds are gusting on you). Even the upper loop in Yellowstone, I felt relatively safe, despite steep and windy roads -- thankfully, the cars also are slowed down a great deal by the steep and windy nature of those roads. The only time I was genuinely worried was coming down Dunraven Pass toward Tower. It was an amazing ride, but I took no chances; I road as close to the middle of the road as I could, in part because it was so narrow, in part because I needed to dictate when cars would pass me, not the other way around (or else I would have risked going over a cliff). However, it was early morning, and there weren't many cars at all. In fact, it wasn't safety I was as concerned with as hypothermia. It was so cold, and going downhill so fast made it even colder. The drivers didn't seem to mind, the few that there were, a few talked with me at Tower Fall, amazed at the speed I was able to go and astounded we ended up at the same place not that many minutes apart. Anyhow, my point is that I felt that Grand Teton, especially, has roads that are biker safe by and large. The shoulders could be widened, and that would help, but by and large, though they are narrow, it's still possible to ride on them. I was actually really surprised to talk to a man working at the pizza place at Leek's Marina who said he was too scared to bike on the narrow shoulders. I thought, "My goodness; if you only knew that you could ride safely through roads a million times worse in the District (or if you want to see unsafe, try riding through Montgomery County, Maryland, which still scares me, though I do it with a mix of road and sidewalk)." That's to say, as an avid biker, one who fights with cars daily and loathes their dominance of the roads, I just am surprised that Grand Teton is the place to fight and win a plan like this. The other thing is that use of the bike path will depend strongly on its quality. If the bike path is bumpy or too narrow, those bikes will go right back on the road. I would. In DC area parks, bikes will use good bike paths; they won't use bike paths that are falling apart or don't absorb shock (especially those of us not plodding along so slowly on mountain bikes). So, a lot will depend on the construction of the path. I think a path is strange; as a biker, I'd prefer a bike lane to a path so long as cars weren't using it as a passing lane (which is why a wide shoulder would undoubtedly do the trick). My only near accident on the trip wasn't in the parks but coming into Jackson. There, the traffic was backed up, and I was passing dozens and dozens of cars on the shoulder. At some point, an RV was ready to move, but I was already just about past it (but not completely). It then lunged to turn right just as I was going by. I got so mad but just missed it by swinging out just far enough to my right. Those who saw it from a nearby store shook their heads and berated the RV driver for being crazy. The danger is always in urban driving or when there is a long line of cars who are not suspecting a fast moving bike on their right. As a biker, I have to take precautions to anticipate almost anything happening. However, for inexperienced bikers, that sort of thing can cause accidents. In the national parks, where there are so few turns, it's not really a problem at all, though. That's where accidents usually happen (cars making right hand turns). In any event, I found this announcement to be a little strange; I live in a very different world.

Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.