Amenity Fee Reaction

Published Date

June 10, 2007

It will be interesting to see whether there's any great, continuing reaction to the spread of amenity fees across the park system. While many have read my initial post on the matter, only one reader has taken the time to comment.
Does that signify indifference with how the parks should be funded? About whether they are closer to becoming an exclusive "pay to play" club? Does it not concern folks that not only is it costing more and more to simply enter a national park, but in more and more instances once inside you'll have to pay more to learn about the parks and their wonders?
I'm not sure. I hope not.
Here are two additional comments I received privately from members of the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees, a group very much concerned about the future of the park system.
"I continue to be very concerned about the fee surge," says Bill Wade, the chair of the coalition's executive council. "I think entrance fees are already dissuading visitors from going to parks, especially low income and often minority citizens. Now, as we see more and more parks begin to charge fees for interpretive and education programs we not only run the risk of turning people off to the idea of visiting parks, but for those who do visit, turning them off to the idea of learning about the very resources they are there to visit."
Rick Smith, a member of the executive council, added this:

"Another problem with the fees for the visitor services that used to be free is that the people who can't afford them lose contact with park rangers, the very people who have always helped people understand the parks. One thing that sold people on parks and made them advocates for their preservation and protection is that contact that they had with the interpreter who told them about a geyser, or why a cave forms, or how the ancient pueblo people grew corn, beans and squash," says Smith. "Now, if they can't afford to pay, their only contact is with an often-poorly trained and poorly-supervised volunteer or SCA (Student Conservation Association) employee.
"Of all the sins of this administration, the gutting of the Park Service interpretive operation is just about the most egregious as far as I am concerned."
What do you think? Does it concern you to have to pay to see a park interpretive film or to take a self-guided tour?

Story Categories:

Plight of the Parks

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures.

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Add new comment

Comments

Submitted by admin on June 12, 2007 - 12:46pm.

As a fiscally conservative liberal (or a socially liberal conservative), I've long had mixed feelings about user fees. They do provide much needed income to the parks and it seems only fair that users pay a reasonable fee. And I am not convinced that fees deter many people. Folks of all income brackets manage to pay the high fees at theme parks and then pay additional fees for amenities once inside. But I've finally decided that is the very reason why we must be very careful of charging fees at our National Parks. Parks are NOT theme parks. Charging entrance fees and amenity fees may change how visitors think about Parks and what they expect. It is the fundamentally authentic experience of a National Park that makes it different from just about any other recreational activity that we pursue. That authentic experience is what makes the National Parks special and it's a fragile thing that is constantly under assault. We are told we must make the Parks "accessible" and "relevant" - which are sometimes code words for motorized recreation and electronic entertainment. In other words, we must make the Parks more like theme parks. I had the opportunity to visit London a while ago and I saw the crown jewels. As the long line of tourists paraded past the display, I heard one (obviously American) woman exclaim "Are they real?" The guard, who had no doubt heard this question one too many times, replied tartly, "Yes, madam. This isn't Disneyland." So, the mountains are real, the battlefields are real, the geysers and meadows and forests and seashores and historic buildings are all real and, no, this isn't Disneyland. And I'd like to keep it that way.

Add comment

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks