You are here

Creature Feature: Rescuing the Island Fox is a Complicated Long-Term Project

Share

Published Date

April 25, 2009

The Island Fox is small, distinctively colored, and needs our help. NPS photo.

The foxes of the Channel Islands were recently rescued from the brink of extinction. Now keeping this species from disappearing is a matter of captive breeding and reintroducing foxes, keeping golden eagles away, restoring abused ecosystems, combating canine distemper, providing medical care, curbing wildlife feeding, reducing vehicle-animal collisions, trapping and radio-collaring, survivor monitoring, prey sampling, ……. and so on.

No one knows for sure how the Island Fox (Urocyon littoralis) ended up on the Channel Islands, five of which -- San Miguel, Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz, Anacapa, and Santa Barbara -- are now part of Channel Island National Park. Did the pioneering foxes that arrived on those distant shores more than 4,000 years ago float in on storm debris? Did Paleoindians transport them there?

This relative of the gray fox is quite small. A fully grown adult weighs no more than four to six pounds -- about the size of a small housecat -- and it’s unlikely to be more than 30 inches long, tail and all. Still, this little fox is the largest of the Channel Islands’ endemic land mammals.

The Island Fox is multi-hued (see accompanying photo). Its head is gray, its sides are a ruddy red color, it’s got white fur on its belly, throat and the lower part of its face, and the top side of its tail has a black stripe on it. It’s hard to mistake this animal for something else.

Over time, a distinct subspecies developed on six of the Channel Islands. (Two of the eight islands have no foxes.) Each subspecies has unique physical and genetic characteristics, such as body weight and number of tail vertebrae. Each is named according to its island of origin.

A slow motion catastrophe that began over 60 years ago nearly wiped out the island fox population on San Miguel, Santa Rosa, and Santa Cruz. The problem on these three northern islands was eagles, or to put a finer point on it, too many of the wrong kind of eagles.

For thousands of years, foxes thrived on the islands in the presence of bald eagles. The two species do not directly compete for the same food and pretty much leave each other alone. The foxes, which are omnivorous, subsist primarily on mice, lizards, crabs, birds, eggs, insects, berries, and cactus fruit. Bald eagles, which are true carnivores, mostly eat fish, sea birds, and carrion.

The fact that bald eagles are fiercely territorial makes their presence very beneficial to island foxes. That’s because bald eagles drive away golden eagles, which are profligate killers of island foxes. Unfortunately, the bald eagles of the Channel Islands were in terrible trouble by the early 1940s due to the relentless accumulation of DDT in the aquatic food chain. As top predators and consumers of fish and sea birds, and thus prime targets for biological amplification of DDT, they got way too much of this nasty chlorinated hydrocarbon in their systems, produced eggshells that were way too thin, and were soon unable to reproduce at all. The last bald eagle chick of that era was fledged in 1949, and soon there were no more resident bald eagles in the Channel Islands.

With bald eagles no longer patrolling the skies, golden eagles began moving in during the 1960s and were nesting on the islands by the 1990s. (Fish and sea birds aren’t important elements of the golden eagle diet, so this terrestrial feeder escaped the DDT disaster that befell the bald eagles.) In the 1990s when golden eagles could no longer prey on feral piglets (the pigs having been exterminated in many locales by the NPS), they began preying more heavily on foxes. Losses quickly exceeded replenishment and the fox population of the northern islands went into profound decline. By the early 2000s, only a small fraction of the original population remained and the future looked very grim for the harried survivors.

In 1999, at the same time golden eagles were making deep inroads in the fox population of the northern islands, canine distemper presumably introduced by pet dogs swept through the Catalina Island subspecies (Urocyon littoralis catalinae) far to the south and reduced the population by more than 90 percent (to around 100 individuals). An emergency vaccination program stopped the epidemic, a captive breeding and restocking program replaced some of the critical losses, and by early 2006 the Catalina Island population had rebounded to about 400. This is still far below the 1,300 or so level of ten years ago.

The Catalina Island subspecies remains a federally listed endangered species, as are the subspecies on San Miguel, Santa Rosa, and Santa Cruz Islands.

On the three northern islands with foxes, eagle predation was so bad that only direct human intervention could save the foxes from extinction. Having the right kind of eagles is, of course, basic to any recovery. In recent years, wildlife biologists relocated more than 40 golden eagles to the mainland from the northern islands and released nearly 50 young bald eagles. The strategy is working.

Three years ago this month, jubilation attended confirmation of the first successful bald eagle chick hatching on the islands in more than half a century. Now that the golden eagles are gone and it’s likely that resident bald eagles will be keeping them away, the future of the foxes on San Miguel, Santa Rosa, and Santa Cruz Islands no longer looks so bleak

Because DDT contamination remains serious at Catalina Island (due to decades-ago illegal dumping), it won’t be possible to have a truly self-sustaining bald eagle population there for a very long time. Meanwhile, biologists are using egg-pulling and artificial incubation to help insure that a resident bald eagle population will be on hand to discourage potential golden eagle invaders.

The island fox population remains distressingly small, so additional human assistance will be needed to make this wildlife drama play out the way we want it to. Reintroducing island foxes to areas where fox niche-spaces remain unfilled and helping individuals survive life-threatening injuries and diseases are two very effective ways to speed up the rate of recovery.

The NPS has been engaged in the captive breeding and restocking of island foxes for a number of years now, and with generally good results. On Santa Catalina, the combined efforts of the NPS, the Catalina Island Conservancy and the Institute for Wildlife Studies have done wonders for that subspecies. In the northern islands, the NPS is working with the Friends of the Island Fox organization and the Institute for Wildlife Studies to help restore fox numbers there.

To see an interesting video showing captive-bred island foxes being released into the wild on San Miguel Island in 2006, visit this site.

One of the more interesting aspects of the island fox recovery program is the operation of medical clinics – dubbed “foxpitals” – on each of the islands with endangered foxes. Most injuries occur during the winter/spring mating season when foxes become unusually aggressive . Lots of other mishaps cause tears, abscesses, bruises, and other problems. Foxes sometimes get scorched in wildfires, hooked by lost fishing lures, hit by cars on Santa Catalina, infected with parasites (such as ringworm), or injured in various and sundry other ways.

Most animals that are treated can be released back into the wild, usually in a matter of a few days or weeks. Recently, some foxes have been found to be suffering from a usually fatal form of ear cancer. Whether a cure for this potentially serious problem can be worked out awaits the results of ongoing research. There’s always something!

Postscript
: Predation by foxes damn near exterminated the critically endangered loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) on Navy-controlled San Clemente Island in the southern part of the archipelago. Fortunately, a fox control program employing nonlethal methods including live trapping (to keep foxes away during the shrike breeding season), electric fencing, and other tactics halted the shrike’s plunge toward ecological oblivion. The Navy no longer bothers to control foxes on San Clemente Island.

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

come on people , theses foxes are adorrable we need to help save themm :) !!!!!


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.