You are here

Possible Congressional Battle Looming Over Parks Legislation Attached To Defense Authorization Bill

Share

Published Date

December 4, 2014

In what could be the most significant legislative action pertaining to national parks since 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives is being asked to approve a defense authorization bill that has been amended to create a number of new units of to the National Park System, from a Blackstone River Valley National Historical Park in New York to a Manhattan Project National Historical Park spread across a handful of states. In the Senate, however, Ted Cruz is promising a battle if the House approves the measure.

The hefty, more than 1,600-page bill also contains measures to increase the size of some parks, would require the "modification" of wildlife buffers at Cape Hatteras National Seashore, the latter a nod to an ongoing dispute over how the National Park Service works to protect threatened and endangered species of shorebirds and sea turtles, and allow for "donor recognition" within parks. Among the park-related aspects of the legislation, which could go to a full House vote Thursday and then on to the Senate next week, are:

* A provision to add the Ashland Harbor Breakwater Light to Apostle Islands National Lakeshore in Wisconsin;

* Create the Blackstone River Valley National Historical Park "to help preserve, protect, and interpret the nationally significant resources that exemplify the industrial heritage of the Blackstone River Valley;"

* Designation of a Coltsville National Historical Park in Connecticut;

* Would redesignate the First State National Monument in Delaware as the First State National Historical Park;

* Would adjust the boundaries of the Stephen Mather Wilderness at North Cascades National Park in Washington state to allow for realignment of the Stehekin Valley Road out of the flood plain;

* Enlarge Oregon Caves National Monument by 4,070 acres, which would be contained in a "National Preserve" attached to the monument;

* Would establish Tule Springs National Monument near Las Vegas;

* Would create a nearly 90,000-acre Valles Caldera National Preserve in New Mexico and transfer it from the U.S. Forest Service to the National Park Service, and;

* Would expand Vicksburg National Military Park in Mississippi.

Other provisions would require the Park Service to study other sites for possible inclusion in the park system. While the legislation also would allow recognition of donors to the parks within the park system, it specifically would prevent "recognition of the donor or any product or service of the donor as an official sponsor, or any similar form of recognition, of the National Park Service or the National Park System; a National Park Service endorsement of the donor or any product or service of the donor; or naming rights to any unit of the National Park System or a National Park System facility, including a visitor center."

To commemorate the centennial of the National Park Service in 2016, the measure allows the U.S. Treasury to mint $5 gold coins, $1 silver coins, and half-dollar coins. The coins would not be placed in circulation, but rather sold as collector's items. Surcharges of $35 per $5 gold coin, $10 per $1 silver coin, and $5 per half-dollar coin would be levied to raise funds for the National Park Foundation, which is tasked with raising charitable dollars for the Park Service.

As to the matter of wildlife management at Cape Hatteras, the legislation also directs the Interior Secretary to consider, "(1) Opening beaches at the National Seashore that are closed to night driving restrictions, by opening beach segments each morning on a rolling basis as daily management reviews are completed. (2) Extending seasonal off-road vehicle routes for additional periods in the Fall and Spring if off-road vehicle use would not create resource management problems at the National Seashore. (3) Modifying the size and location of vehicle-free areas."

It was not immediately clear what sort of funding burden these measures would place on the National Park Service if approved.

Outside of the Park Service, the legislation would create or expand officially designated wilderness in national forests, and would in some instances convey federal lands to state and local governments.

While the bill has yet to pass the full House, Sen. Cruz was adamant Wednesday in calling for the Senate to reject the measure.

"The decision to attach an extreme land grab to the (defense authorization bill) is a disservice to members of the Armed Forces," said the Republican from Texas. "With the military's shrinking budget, it is offensive that this bill would be used to fund congressional pork. And, at a time where jobs are scarce and the federal government has removed billions of acres of land from productive use, Congress should not be restricting more than a half-million new acres. The House and Senate should reject this attempt by self-serving politicians to exploit the men and women of the military to serve their special interests."

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Interesting that the Hatteras issue is so prominent here.  Guess the beach driver folks will be happy.

 


This is one more example of the sleazy slipperiness of Congress.  A 1600 page amendment to a bill that is completely unrelated.  Weren't we told repeatedly that a former 1600 page bill called the Affordable Care Act was so big no one could comprehend it?

Our Congressional crap is enough to gag a maggot.

While some of this may actually have some benefits, it simply is not the way the business of our nation should be done. 


Agree, Lee. I realize Congress is in a rush to start yet another long holiday break, but I've never been in favor of lumping totally unrelated measures together. Far too often, that's a strategy used to push through some items that might not pass muster if voted on independently; attaching the "guns in parks" bill to a credit card reform bill several years ago is a good example.

One has to wonder how much time for committee review and hearings has been given to the various park-related items in this measure.


I am happy that we are attemping to restore reasonable access to Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area. This is a good start and I see the bill has PASSED the House by a big margin. But I am NOT happy that this important change is being piggy backed on a defense bill like this. 


Not many people realize that probably most of our "laws" and "regulations" are created not by bills that are properly discussed, debated and then voted upon.  The average number of amendments and riders attached to almost any legitimate bill is enormous -- I've heard it runs about 1200.  Many of those are slapped onto a bill literally minutes before it goes to the floor for a vote.  No fuss, no muss -- no debate and no sunshine.

Utah's Orrin Hatch is a master at that technique.

Because these amendments are never examined by anyone, they often result in some ridiculous contradictions and complications.  Many of them decree that one Federal agency or another must change a regulation to satisfy a request from an influential (read wealthy contributor) friend of the Congresscreep who writes the amendment.

That's why, for example, HUD and FHA have a set of requirements for approval of FHA loans for condominiums that directly oppose one another.  On one hand, a condo may not have more than 50% of its units rented or approval is denied.  On the other hand, the condo may not try to place a cap limiting the number of rentals to less than 50%.

It's also almost impossible to try to trace the origin of these amendments because of the convoluted tangle of confusing documentation an ordinary person finds if they try.  The Congressslimes have found all sorts of creative ways to hide their skullduggery.

And just in case anyone thinks I have absolutely no respect for members of our House and Senate, you're absolutely right!


Even worse than the unread amendments is the fact that far more rules and regs are established, enforced and judicated (i.e. no seperation of powers) by unelected regulatory agencies.


"'Of course not. Are you kidding?' Rep. Jim Moran (D-Virginia) said when asked by CNSNews if he had perused the entire bill, which was just posted online late Tuesday night before it was ultimately passed in by the House by a vote of 300-119 about 36 hours later."

(http://rt.com/usa/211879-ndaa-congress-read-bills/)

I'll bet not more than 10 congressmen even knew the word "Hatteras" was in the bill.

 


One more torpedo contained in this Murphy's Stew is one that will open the Tongass National Forest's old growth timber to logging.

These amendments and riders on legitimate bills are simply cheap ways to push through something that wouldn't stand a chance of passing on its own.

(For those of you who never attended a Boy Scout camp, Murphy's Stew is found in the pit under the potties.  I cannot think of a better way to describe most of the products dropped on the American people by our legislators.)


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.