You are here

Research Shows Steady Decline In Snowfall At Yellowstone National Park

Share

Published Date

April 10, 2015
Alternate Text
These poor snow conditions in Yellowstone, photographed in February, might reflect the new norm, not merely an aberration, according to snowpack research in the park.

This past winter saw an earlier-than-usual decline in snowpack on Yellowstone National Park roads, one that forced the park to shut down access to some snowmobilers and snowcoaches. While some might write that off to simply an unseasonal winter, record-keeping in the park shows less snow is falling there and that in some parts of Yellowstone the once-typical Rocky Mountain winter is actually much shorter than it used to be.

One can debate whether this is simply a natural cycling of the Earth's climate or human-driven global warming -- Yellowstone researchers point to the latter -- but the bottom line, as they note, is that "(D)espite all these caveats and complications, we are confident in saying the long-term forecast in Yellowstone calls for less snow. There may be a few decades-long bumps and flat places in the trend, but the overall picture of a declining staircase is clear. People who rely on water that begins its life as snow in the mountains of Yellowstone should be aware of this fact and plan accordingly."

The snowfall study was released this week in a special climate change edition of Yellowstone Science. The issue offers a range of articles involving climate change in Yellowstone, from the trends in snowfall to how the park's forests will fare under a changing climate.

Whitebark pine was projected to have the greatest loss in area of suitable habitat in the GYE. The areal extent of adult reproductive aged stands has already declined dramatically across the GYE due to mortality from mountain pine beetles. Will whitebark pine be entirely lost from the GYE? Hope for the persistence of whitebark pine in GYE is bolstered by its history. Pollen records indicate that five-needle pine (whitebark and/or limber pine) remained in the region over the past 10,000 years even during the relatively warm hypsithermal period (Iglesias et al., in revision). More research is needed, but various hypotheses suggest viable populations can remain through the projected harsher climate in 2100.

As for snowfall in the park, the researchers detected a trend the layman might find interesting: "We have seen that the longest snow course records in Yellowstone had no significant gain or loss of April 1 SWE (snow water equivalent) from the early 20th century to present day because they include both low snow eras of the Dust Bowl 1930s and the 2000s."

However, the authors went on to note, if you measured snowpack from 1961-2012 -- the longest continuous period during which researchers could rely on SNOTEL data collections from the same sites -- "...70% (21/30) of the sites had significant declines during this 52-year period."

What was behind the decline in snowpack?

"... taken as an average, sites with declining snowpack during 1961'“2012 generally had lower precipitation and higher average daily maximum temperatures during the winter months," the article's authors wrote.

"These patterns suggest increasing temperatures during January, February, March, and April have caused significant snow declines in locations with higher average temperatures by pushing them over the freezing point more often. Other factors contributing to site-to-site differences in snowpack patterns include wind scouring (removes snow) and amount of tree cover (protects snow from sun and wind). Interestingly, the elevations of declining vs. no-trend sites overlapped and were not a good explanation of site-to-site differences."

They go on to say that warmer temperatures are the most likely cause for the decline, and that "(L)ocations that were generally wetter and cooler have not yet demonstrated declines, but with continued climate change will begin to lose their snowpack too."

Strikingly, the researchers found that in recent years some parts of Yellowstone have experienced 80-100 more days of above-freezing temperatures that they did in the mid-1980s. "In other words, the season during which temperatures are above freezing is roughly 3 months longer now than it was 25 years ago at the Northeast Entrance."

Related Stories:

Stories about:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Thank you Lee, now you have me interested in Diane Ackermans book, take a look at "Speaking of Bears". Just Rachel Mazur's chapter on Black Bear biology is very informative. Just a wonderful book.  


A good teacher knows that allowing a struggling student to take the easy way out and simply give them the answer to a question will not help them develop independent thinking and learning skills.

Roger's advice is spot on.  Besides, it's essential to actually read the book for oneself because then the reader must actually interact with the book and information it contains.  Then, and only then, can the reader make rational decisions whether or not to agree or disagree with its contents. 

Trying to provide any information to lazy students is a futile effort that enables them to make only trifling comments or instigate endless round robins of argument without substance. 

Read the book.  You might surprise yourself and actually learn something.


My experience is that anyone that says " read the book" either hasn't read the book themselves, doesn't understand the book or knows the book doesn't substantiate their argument.  

i'll just put this down as another example of your failing to substantiate your claims.

 


And somehow a person, who you already have made clear you don't believe, quoting to you from their copy of the book that the nations were "Inner Slobovia, Upper Turkey Trot, and Uztrollistan" and you would then feel that they had in fact substantiated their claims?

 

You can "put it down" to the ceiling being cheddar, but it still won't expose you to the information you were referred to.

Lonely, in your world.


It's that kind of slothfulness that has allowed so many lazy Americans to be hornswaggled by the Limbaughs of the world.

I'll just put this down as another example of your failing to actually have any interest at all in trying to learn the truth about so many of the things you troll about.

I'm sure other readers here are capable of deciding who is worthy of belief and who is not.

As one who has spent a number of winter excursions into Yellowstone in the last fifteen years or so, I can certainly attest to the fact that snowfalls have frequently (but not always) been lacking.  Warmer water in the Pacific was predicted to strengthen the normal western high pressure ridges and pull wamer, drier air into the western part of the country even as it pushed low pressure further east and set up a polar jet stream pattern.  It looks like that prediction is beginning to play out.  The future will tell.  If the patterns persist as predicted, it's gonna be grim both in the west and in the east.


So Lee, you can't answer the question. Once again you can't substatiate your claim. 


you would then feel that they had in fact substantiated their claims?

No Rick, I then could evaluate whether their claims were valid. If they don't identify the countries, then by default, their claims are invalid. 


Good lard. If I said that same statement you would jump all over me for my logical falacies. Never leave your small little internally consistent and ever so lonely world - the jarring incongruities of the world at large that you can't control would drive you bonkers.

 


Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.