You are here

Research Shows Steady Decline In Snowfall At Yellowstone National Park

Share

Published Date

April 10, 2015
Alternate Text
These poor snow conditions in Yellowstone, photographed in February, might reflect the new norm, not merely an aberration, according to snowpack research in the park.

This past winter saw an earlier-than-usual decline in snowpack on Yellowstone National Park roads, one that forced the park to shut down access to some snowmobilers and snowcoaches. While some might write that off to simply an unseasonal winter, record-keeping in the park shows less snow is falling there and that in some parts of Yellowstone the once-typical Rocky Mountain winter is actually much shorter than it used to be.

One can debate whether this is simply a natural cycling of the Earth's climate or human-driven global warming -- Yellowstone researchers point to the latter -- but the bottom line, as they note, is that "(D)espite all these caveats and complications, we are confident in saying the long-term forecast in Yellowstone calls for less snow. There may be a few decades-long bumps and flat places in the trend, but the overall picture of a declining staircase is clear. People who rely on water that begins its life as snow in the mountains of Yellowstone should be aware of this fact and plan accordingly."

The snowfall study was released this week in a special climate change edition of Yellowstone Science. The issue offers a range of articles involving climate change in Yellowstone, from the trends in snowfall to how the park's forests will fare under a changing climate.

Whitebark pine was projected to have the greatest loss in area of suitable habitat in the GYE. The areal extent of adult reproductive aged stands has already declined dramatically across the GYE due to mortality from mountain pine beetles. Will whitebark pine be entirely lost from the GYE? Hope for the persistence of whitebark pine in GYE is bolstered by its history. Pollen records indicate that five-needle pine (whitebark and/or limber pine) remained in the region over the past 10,000 years even during the relatively warm hypsithermal period (Iglesias et al., in revision). More research is needed, but various hypotheses suggest viable populations can remain through the projected harsher climate in 2100.

As for snowfall in the park, the researchers detected a trend the layman might find interesting: "We have seen that the longest snow course records in Yellowstone had no significant gain or loss of April 1 SWE (snow water equivalent) from the early 20th century to present day because they include both low snow eras of the Dust Bowl 1930s and the 2000s."

However, the authors went on to note, if you measured snowpack from 1961-2012 -- the longest continuous period during which researchers could rely on SNOTEL data collections from the same sites -- "...70% (21/30) of the sites had significant declines during this 52-year period."

What was behind the decline in snowpack?

"... taken as an average, sites with declining snowpack during 1961'“2012 generally had lower precipitation and higher average daily maximum temperatures during the winter months," the article's authors wrote.

"These patterns suggest increasing temperatures during January, February, March, and April have caused significant snow declines in locations with higher average temperatures by pushing them over the freezing point more often. Other factors contributing to site-to-site differences in snowpack patterns include wind scouring (removes snow) and amount of tree cover (protects snow from sun and wind). Interestingly, the elevations of declining vs. no-trend sites overlapped and were not a good explanation of site-to-site differences."

They go on to say that warmer temperatures are the most likely cause for the decline, and that "(L)ocations that were generally wetter and cooler have not yet demonstrated declines, but with continued climate change will begin to lose their snowpack too."

Strikingly, the researchers found that in recent years some parts of Yellowstone have experienced 80-100 more days of above-freezing temperatures that they did in the mid-1980s. "In other words, the season during which temperatures are above freezing is roughly 3 months longer now than it was 25 years ago at the Northeast Entrance."

Related Stories:

Stories about:

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

generally had lower precipitation and higher average daily maximum temperatures during the winter months," the article's authors wrote."These patterns suggest increasing temperatures during January, February, March, and April have caused significant snow declines in locations with higher average temperatures by pushing them over the freezing point more often.

Why, if the period had lower precipitation, are they solely blaming less snow on warmer air?  Even if it were cold, if there is less precipitation, there would be less snow. The paper doesn't include a single charge on total precipitation.  It does say, however:

We have seen that the longest snow course records in
Yellowstone had no significant gain or loss of April 1 SWE
from the early 20th century to present day because they
include both low snow eras of the Dust Bowl 1930s and

the 2000s


EC, did you see the section on tree ring data, which point to a long-term decline in preciptation as snowfall?

Annual tree ring width is a highly accurate proxy for precipitation. Figure 7 is a zoomed-out version of the pattern seen in figure 3. Instead of using just April 1 SWE from 1919 to 2012, it shows a combined average of all the sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem from 1200 AD to the present. Red arrows in figure 7 indicate the same low points during the 1930s and 2000s as seen in figure 3. With this added perspective, we can see these two drought periods were not just the driest in living memory but were actually the lowest snow years in the past 800 years. As stated earlier, the results of our trend analysis depended on which years you choose to include, and now we see that is doubly true. Our analysis of the longer, pre-1938 snow courses (figure 4, left panel) by chance showed no trend because it included the two periods of lowest snowpack ever recorded at its start and end points.  If we had used tree ring records and calculated a trend line over the last 800 years, we would have concluded Yellowstone was experiencing severe snow decline. 

 


we would have concluded Yellowstone was experiencing severe snow decline

Which is likely due to a precipitation decline.  The tree doesn't care if it falls as snow or rain.


It does if that snowfall creates a deep snowpack that slowly releases its moisture through the spring and into the summer months....Decline in snowpack = less overall moisture release.


Yes Kurt, but the tree rings can't tell if they have gotten less moisture because of less snow or because of less precipitation.  Less precipitation will cause less moisture, whether it falls as rain or as snow.


What we certainly can conclude from the tree ring data, is that human stupidity has never been higher at any time during the last 3,000 years. ;-)


EC, snowpack holds that moisture, whether great or small, for longer periods of time and slowly releases it and makes it more readily available for trees to absorb. Rain events lead both to comparatively rapid runoff as well as evaporation that whisks that moisture away more quickly and so makes it unavailable to trees and other vegetation.


Kurt I understand that. My point is if there is less precipitation, there is going to be less snow.  This study does not take into account how much precipitation there was over the time frame - although they did note it was less.  Was the snowpack lower because it was warmer, or was it lower because there was less precipitation?  The tree rings don't answer that question and neither does the "study", it just jumps to the conclusion its the temperature.  But then, that is what might expect from a publications whose existence is predicated on the believe in global warming. 


Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.