You are here

National Park Service Director Impressed With Maine North Woods, National Park Proponents Hopeful

Share

Published Date

May 18, 2016

It was mere happenstance, two events more than 2,000 miles apart, but the irony was inescapable: at a time when the Western United States is losing a "football field worth of natural area" to development every 2.5 minutes, an opportunity to set aside nearly 100,000 acres in the Northeast as part of the National Park System was deemed within reach.

“The land in the North Woods area proposed for donation absolutely fits the National Park Service’s criteria for national park sites, including suitability, feasibility and national significance. There is no other representative landscape like the North Woods in the national park system,” National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis said Monday after touring the lands the Elliotsville Plantation, Inc., wants to donate to the park system.

“The long history of philanthropic giving in the National Park System developed here in Maine, with the gifts of land from John D. Rockefeller that created today’s Acadia National Park, and that tradition is alive and well today across the country," he added. "The people of Maine should be proud of this nationally significant natural and cultural landscape and the legacy of philanthropic conservation that took root here.” 

The potential 87,500-acre prize that could be added to the park system and abut Maine's Baxter State Park stands out in stark contrast to the news from the Center for American Progress, which held a press conference Tuesday to say how quickly natural areas in the West were being lost to development.

"With each flight home, we get a bird’s eye view of sprawling new roads, oil wells, and pipelines. The Oregon woods we explored as kids are now stumps without songbirds. We see fewer stars through Santa Fe’s brightening lights," reads a section of a webpage the Center launched to raise awareness of the vanishing landscape. 

Back in Maine, the odds of preserving a large swath of the Maine North Woods seemed to have grown with Director Jarvis' visit last weekend and into Monday, a trip that involved not just touring the lands in question but meeting with elected officials, including U.S. Sen. Angus King, and local residents.

“Hearing from North, South, East, West and Central Mainers about this proposal provides important context as I consider my recommendations regarding a possible new national park site in the North Woods of Maine,” said Director Jarvis, who didn't indicate when he would discuss the proposal with Interior Secretary Sally Jewell.

The meetings seemed to somewhat sway Sen. King, who once strongly opposed the idea of a national park in the heart of Maine but said Monday that, "I'm not prepared to say ... no to something that will have a positive contribution..."

Additionally, the Bangor newspaper has endorsed the idea, as have voters in Maine's Second Congressional District, and the Katahdin Area Chamber of Commerce.

Not everyone is for the park, though, and some local officials have grown weary of saying "no" to it.

“No governing body has recommended or wants this park or monument, not on any level,” the Bangor Daily News quoted Millinocket Town Councilor Michael Madore as saying during a public meeting Monday. “This would be in our backyard. We ask that you please let this go, finally.”

Still, the tide seems to be turning in favor of the park, believes Lucas St. Clair, the son of Burt's Bees heiress Roxanne Quimby, who wants to donate not only 87,500 acres of her land to the Park Service, but throw in $20 million on the day the unit is established for an endowment for the park and raise another $20 million in the ensuing three years. The $40 million would be earmarked for maintenance and operations.

"It is unbelievably positive. I couldn't be happier," Mr. St. Clair said Tuesday during a phone call. "We had a public meeting last night (in Orono, Maine). We had probably 1,200, over 1,200 people show up. And there were probably only 200 or so who were in opposition. So we had about 1,000 supporters there. It was just a very well coordinated effort with banners, and hats, and T-shirts, and stickers and incredible speakers and everyone just rallied. 

"Director Jarvis and Sen. King walked out on the stage and got a standing ovation by a 1,400-seat auditorium that was filled almost to capacity," he went on. "It was just amazing."

Director Jarvis's visit allowed him to be "the ultimate validator for a lot of things that we've been saying we thought were possible," Mr. St. Clair added. "Certain activities, the way conservation would happen. People were able to ask very specific questions, and he was able to answer them very articulately with calm reason."

The North Woods project has changed drastically since it was initially broached back in the 1990s. At that time, supporters wanted to see a national park of more than 3 million acres, or roughly a third again as large as Yellowstone National Park. Strong opposition led to a significantly downsized vision, one that has even lost the "National Park" cachet in favor for the somewhat lesser "National Monument" attribution. The change is part of a strategy that would allow President Obama to use the Antiquities Act to designate the monument without congressional action, something not considered likely at this point.

Regardless of the name, the nearly 100,000 acres would bring a unique landscape to the National Park System, believes Mr. St. Clair.

"It's completely unique to the park system," he said. "This would be a unit like no other unit. This hardwood, northern hardwood forest and Eastern watershed and system of rivers, it just doesn't exist anywhere else (in the park system).

"The fact that this is within a day's drive of a quarter of the population of the United States is another factor," he added. "This one has a remote and wild feel, yet it's close to the megalopolis of the Northeastern Seaboard."

Mr. St. Clair still holds out hope for a "national park," but viewed the monument route as the most feasible at this point.

"I've changed my thinking a bit about the monument. I still want it to become a national park, I still want Congress to pass legislation that creates a park. But I also want these communities to start realizing some of the economic benefits that public lands provide," he said. "And the sooner we do that, the sooner the economic benefits begin to be realized. So if we can have this declared as a national monument as an interim step, have it managed by the Park Service and begin the process of building infrastructure and attracting visitors, then I think that's probably the way to go.

"...This is the centennial year of the Park Service, and the last year of the Obama administration. Could there potentially be an opportunity that we could seize?"

The calendar is running, both on the Park Service centennial and the waning months of the Obama administration. Mr. St. Clair said he'd like to have the land included in the park system before the president leaves office because a new administration would mean new relationships to build and garner support from.

"Part of me thinks that now is the time," he said. "Most of me thinks that."

Related Stories:

Stories about:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Having this land as a National Monument/Park in my backyard is an amazing gift and blessing to the people of Northern Maine! Thank you Quimby Family


If Congress is not going to support NPS and the maintenance backlog how......in good conscience........can NPS continue to expand? Its like a person having one year to live, maxing out every credit card they have to fulfill a  bucket list and letting the heirs pay the bill after they die.


This,  is not in your backyard. Newport, Maine is 100 miles from the proposed Monument Park. The local towns most proximate to the Park, have all voted 2 - 1 against it. This has been consistent for 30 years.


There are some interesting parallels between the history of Acadia, and the current debate over the proposed Maine Woods National Monument, as we explore in our latest blog post: http://acadiaonmymind.com/2016/05/5-lessons-from-acadia-for-katahdin-are...


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.