I am totally against this proposed fee hike for 17 of our famous parks, most in the West. Congress must fund the parks properly with our taxes. We have to step up and tell our representatives that national parks are important to us.
Now why would I say that? Why would I even care, as I live within 45 minutes of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, the best hiking park in the country, and almost within walking distance of the Blue Ridge Parkway? Neither charge an entrance fee. In fact, most of the parks in the South don't charge a fee, and it would be easy for me to just ignore this proposed increase. I also have a Senior Pass that gains me free entry to the parks.
But this proposed fee hike isn't just about me.
It's about families who can decide to go to Yellowstone National Park, or to a state park, or to Disneyworld. For many families living east of the Mississippi, a long trip cross country to visit these large iconic parks, especially Yellowstone and Yosemite, is a rite of passage. They wait until their children are old enough to enjoy it but not so old that they won’t want to travel with mom and dad anymore. Most go from park to park, seeing how many they can rack up. Not the best way to understand a national park, but that’s what many people do.
It's the 25-year olds making their first cross-country trip to see these classic Western parks. They’ve finished their formal education and know that once they go to work, they’ll only have two weeks of vacation. They finally have a reliable car, a couple of like-minded friends, and some camping equipment. These young folks want to see several parks on their big, first trip and won't be willing to pay $70 for a day in each park. Newbies don't spend a week in any one park.
How are they going to feel invested in national parks? They'll go to the national forest next door- nice but not the same. Most people don’t even know the difference between a national park, a national, forest, a state park or state forest. When I tried to explain the practical difference to fellow hikers in Western North Carolina, their reply is “whatever” - whatever, that is, until bear and deer hunting season when they have to pay attention.
Visitors can buy an annual pass for $80, which will get a carful in any federal recreation site for free for a year. Most readers of the Traveler know about all these options, but I have a feeling that the average visitor doesn’t study the websites carefully. Witness the rush for Senior Passes before the price went up from $10 to $80 this past August.
Two eastern parks are on the list for potential fee increases: Acadia National Park in Maine and Shenandoah National Park in Virginia. Shenandoah already charges $25 per vehicle for a week. How many visitors stay a week in Shenandoah? Many pop in for a day of sightseeing or to climb Old Rag, probably on their way to Washington, D.C. They’ll forgo driving the Skyline Drive and stay on the interstate.
The same argument goes for Acadia National Park outside of Bar Harbor, Maine. The gateway town is so busy, so full of gift shops and ice cream stands that it might be just as easy to just skip the national park rather than hand over $70 for a day driving the loop road.
I did read at least one article, published in Slate magazine, that raising entrance fees would shift visitors from the most popular parks (the top of the pops) to lesser known parks or to less popular times. Would that do it? If I want to go to Yellowstone in the summer, when my kids and grandkids are out of school, I don’t think I would be satisfied with a lesser-known park.
In a recent Traveler article, Kurt ponders The Relevancy Of National Parks, he wrote the following:
Do sheer numbers reflect that more people are truly interested in coming to the National Park System to marvel at their wonders, learn about the nation’s collective culture, to relax? Or do they reflect a desire by travelers to crisscross the country and document as many places they can visit, regardless of what those places reflect or represent?
If national parks are important to you, let your representatives in Washington know. That’s where the funding should come from.
Please read about the entrance fee proposal and comment.
A public comment period on the National Park Service entrance fee proposal is open until Nov. 23, and comments can be filed at https//parkplanning.nps.gov/proposedpeakseasonfeerates. Written comments also are accepted by sending to 1849 C Street, NW, Mail Stop: 2346, Washington, DC 20240.
Comments
Zinke proposes a $400 million cut in National Park funding, while the proposed entrance fee increase is expected to raise about $70 million. The expected result is that park visitors will be paying more for redeuced services; including maintenance, intepretation, law enforcement and resource protection.
For all of you feeling smug because you're smart enough to buy the $80 annual pass, hang onto that feeling as long as you can. Do you really think that price is going to last long once this goes through? You too my friends are going to feel the pain.
"First, they came for the socialists . . ."
The price has been stable for some time, and the National Park Service can't unilaterally change the price. It would have to be done with the cooperation of the Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of Agriculture.
And what makes you think that would be a problem?