You are here

Interior Department Proposing To Swap Baltimore-Washington Parkway To Maryland

Share

Published Date

June 25, 2018
The Baltimore-Washington Parkway

Interior Secretary Zinke is proposing to swap the Baltimore-Washington Parkway to the state of Maryland for land that is "more suited to the mission of the National Park Service"/NPS file

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is proposing to trade a 19-mile section of the Baltimore-Washington Parkway to the state of Maryland. The move comes just months after the secretary diverted bridge maintenance funds from the parkway to pay for repairs to the Arlington Memorial Bridge in Washington, D.C.

Maryland's governor last fall proposed a $9 billion transportation plan to improve three congested highways, among them Baltimore-Washington Parkway, by adding additional express lanes. To do that, though, Maryland would need National Park Service approval.

According to a September 2017 story in the Baltimore Sun, the governor's $1.4 billion plan for the Baltimore-Washington Parkway "involves persuading the federal government to give the Baltimore-Washington Parkway, now controlled by the National Park Service, to the Maryland Transportation Authority."

Whether it was sheer coincidence or not, five months later when President Trump this past February broached his infrastructure plan, it included mention of divesting the federal government of the George Washington and Baltimore-Washington parkways.

The Arlington Memorial Bridge long has needed serious repairs, but Congress has failed to set aside a specific appropriation for the $227 million project. Last December, a handful of months after Secretary Zinke met with Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, the secretary announced he had found a way to fund the repairs without Congress's help: The $227 million would come, in part, from $74 million in Federal Lands Transportation Program funds along with $33 million, or roughly one-fourth, of the Park Service's annual construction budget. Another $30 million was made available through an amendment U.S. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Virginia, attached to the Fiscal 2017 Appropriations Act, and the remaining $90 million from a FASTLANE grant.

As Traveler has reported, the use of that $33 million from the construction project impacts at least two Park Service projects. Part of the money comes from a delay in plans to rehabilitate the Elk Creek Visitor Center at Curecanti National Recreation Area, and an unspecified amount from the Baltimore-Washington Parkway, where it was to have been spent on bridge repairs.

Early Monday evening, Secretary Zinke announced that, "in an effort to carry out President Trump’s call to improve America’s infrastructure and transform our roads and bridges, the U.S. Department of the Interior and the state of Maryland have signed a non-binding general agreement to work together to explore possible legislative solutions regarding future management alternatives for a 19-mile portion of the Baltimore-Washington Parkway that is administered by the National Park Service. While no decisions have been made, the agreement provides a framework for DOI to collaborate with Governor Hogan and the state of Maryland to evaluate all possibilities."

“The most direct interaction that many Americans have with our nation's infrastructure is on their everyday commute,” Secretary Zinke said. “This is an initial step in determining what solution best serves the American taxpayers, including those who rely on the Baltimore-Washington Parkway to travel and commute every day.”

According to an Interior Department release, "(O)n the American Society of Civil Engineers' 2017 Infrastructure Report Card, America's roads received a "D" grade. The report cites an Urban Mobility Scorecard from the Texas A&M Transportation Institute and INRIX, which indicates that in 2014, congestion cost Americans $160 billion in lost time and spent fuel. The Scorecard lists the Washington, D.C.-Virginia-Maryland area as the urban area with the highest yearly delay per auto commuter (82 hours), tied for the highest amount of excess fuel per auto commuter (35 gallons), and the highest congestion cost per commuter ($1,834)."

The Baltimore-Washington Parkway serves as a major transportation artery into Washington, D.C., with nearly 120,000 commuters daily. Ongoing development has increased traffic volumes and led to regular congestion.

“The Department of the Interior is not in the business of managing commuter highways. We owe it to the 120,000 taxpayers who use the Parkway every day to make the best possible decision to relieve traffic congestion and increase public safety in the region,” Secretary Zinke said. “It makes sense to explore a potential exchange of a highway for land that is more suited to the mission of the National Park Service.”

The parkway was authorized by Congress in 1950 as an extension of the park system of the District of Columbia to be managed by the NPS. It opened in 1954 and became an alternative to U.S. Route 1, which runs parallel to the west of the Parkway. It is designated as a Historic District and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

If it was authorized by Congress in 1950  to be managed by the NPS, wouldn't Secretary Zinke require Congressional approval to transfer the Parkway away from NPS to the State of Maryland?


Actually, having served as a ranger in Greenbelt Park, Maryland, where the BW Parkway is the little park's eastern boundary, and an Interstate highway interchange occupies the northeastern corner of the park, I think this just might be a pretty good idea.  (Do you need some smelling salts, ec? I can send some if you need 'em.)

Even back in 1971, the BW became a hopeless parking lot for a couple of hours in the morning and evening.  I can't begin to imagine what it's like today.  This might even be a chance for someone with some foresight to install one of Albert's railroad thingies.

In fact, it was in Greenbelt that some researchers took soil and leaf samples from the park's woods and back yards of homes on the other side of the parkway looking for lead contamination.  It turned out to be present at a very high level.  That was one of the major points of evidence that brought about the demise of leaded gasoline.

The NPS needs the BW and GW Parkways about as much as the rest of us need bad toothaches.  This might be an opportunity for Congress to reverse one of its mistakes. 

 

 


Its a fabulous idea.  BW & GW Parways and the Arlington Bridge never should have been in the NPS to begin with.  As to smelling salts, even a blind squirrels finds a nut once in a while.  ;)

 


Agreed.  I still have hopes you'll do that someday.  ;-}


Touche

 


Don't just give it away...LEASE it.  I believe NPS has the authority to lease it.  Think about it..the federal piece of 295 connects the pieces owned by the state of Maryland.  It is a golden opportunity to lease it, earn the revenue, stop having to operate it and then reinvest the revenue back into other NPS assets.  You have Elon Musk who wants to build his underground connector there - talk about money.  DON'T JUST GIVE IT AWAY!!!    This might be a better option than a land swap - I mean what is the appraised value of the BW Parkway going to be and is there really a parcel of land that Maryland will give NPS that will equal that value?

If we are serious about taking care of the deferred maintenance of the NPS we should use this opportunity to not give an assett away but use the assett to earn some revenu.  I hope this is considered. 

 

BTW..if you want a great place to stay while visiting DC, stay at Greenbelt Park right off the BW Parkway. $20 a night at a campground, you can walk to Metro and it is right next to College Park, etc.  A hidden gem.   It used to be a blast when the Dead played at RFK back in the day - it was DeadHead Central!!!

 


Interesting thought Mather but not sure what the insentive would be for the state to lease.  I must assume there is already an easement established for the Parkways. 

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.