You are here

Five Shots Over Three Days Needed To Kill Great Smoky Mountains Black Bear

Share

Published Date

October 29, 2018

It took five shots, over a three-day period, to kill a black bear at Great Smoky Mountains National Park/Tennessee Wildlife Resources file photo

Five shots over three days were needed to kill a young Great Smoky Mountains National Park black bear linked to a ginseng poacher who turned up dead in the park last month.

But the necropsy that pinpointed the bullet wounds failed to reach a conclusion as to whether the 155-pound bear attacked and killed William Lee Hill, Jr., 30, of Louisville, Tenn., whose body was found September 11 in the woods about 2 miles north of Cades Cove and about a half-mile from the Rich Mountain Road.

When searchers found his body, which had signs of being fed on by predators, they also encountered a black bear that was acting aggressively towards them.

Since it wasn't known whether the bear had killed Hill or fed on his body, a decision was made to sedate the bear and place a GPS radio collar on it and let it go pending further information, park staff said at the time. The next day, park staff, in discussions with Superintendent Cassius Cash, decided to destroy the bear. 

While park staff announced on September 16 that the bear was killed that morning near where Hill's body was found, what they didn't say at the time that there had been an earlier attempt to shoot and kill the bear. Nor did they say the bear was shot to death, instead of being tranquilized and then put to death with a toxic cocktail of drugs.

Great Smoky spokeswoman Dana Soehn, who was on temporary assignment in the Park Service's Atlanta regional office at the time of the incident, told the Traveler upon her return that "the biologists spent several days tracking the bear and were consistently challenged by weather, terrain, thick vegetation, and the elusive behavior of the bear. The bear was located on the second day of tracking in a thick stand of rhododendron, and a biologist did attempt to shoot it, but the shot was not lethal. Three days later, park staff successfully located and euthanized the bear via gunshot (four shots)."

She was not sure whether park officials alerted visitors that there might be a wounded bear in the area.

According to the necropsy (attached below), the four shots fired on September 16 hit the bear, estimated to be 3 years old, in the skull, base of the right ear, the neck, and the left hind leg. The skull shot did not penetrate the brain, but deflected off into the chest. The earlier shot apparently grazed the bear in the right shoulder, according to the pathologist.

The bear did not seem in a weakened condition and desperate for food. Its teeth were in good shape, and its belly was "full" of acorn meat," noted the pathologist, who made no mention of human remains in the stomach.

"There are no lesions to explain the thin body condition or abnormal behavior of this bear," concluded the pathologist, Dr. Linden E. Craig, who works at the University of Kentucky.

On Monday the park spokeswoman, after discussing the incident Great Smoky Mountains National Park's wildlife biologist, said shooting a bear in the brain is considered to be a humane way to kill it under American Veterinary Medical Association guidelines.

"Obviously, given our field situations with terrain and dense vegetation, it is very difficult to closely approach a bear and shoot it in the brain," said Soehn in an email. "This bear was shot four times, including one to the head that did not penetrate the brain, within a matter of seconds to kill it and end its life as quickly and humanely as possible, and therefore, within the scope of these guidelines and the recommendations provided by the NPS veterinarian."

Related Stories:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Come on people, 3 days and 4 shots. More experienced personnel are available.


Next time hire bubba next door (Townsend) that knows how to hunt bear with the right weapon and ammunition


It's a unnecessary waste. The bear did suffer. These park rangers need more specialized training


Perhaps if the poacher wasn't illegally removing ginsing to begin with....


You're talking about the same Superintendent who allowed a fire to get out of hand and kill a dozen people in Gatlinburg, and the same regime who shot the wrong bear once again over 2 years ago when it attacked a boy over on the NC side, only to have the DNA prove they shot the wrong one.

Ineptitude.  Thy name is NPS


What a sad waste of life.  If you can't get the job done, don't shoot.  Hire better, NPS. 


While the headline makes this seem like the bear was in agony for 3 days here is another possibility. The first shot which "grazed the bear in the right shoulder" did little more than take a bit of hair and the bear wasn't harmed in the least. When they were able to catch up to the bear again they fired 4 shots to ensure the bear did not escape wounded. It is not often a single shot drops an animal immediately so a few added shots seem appropriate to make sure the bear doesn't suffer. Those shots may have occurred in seconds. I don't know the exact circumstances but would not automatically assume the bear suffered. The fact the first shot only "grazed" the bear is worth asking under what circumstances that shot was taken. I am also curious why they weren't able to use dna samples to learn if this is the bear in question? I assumed that would be standard practice but apparently I am wrong.


Wild, did you see the bear at the necropsy? Pathologist said the shot left a wound of roughly 2 inches through the muscle. Not sure I'd categorize that as "not harmed in the least."

As to whether "a few added shots seemed appropriate to make sure the bear doesn't suffer," the guidelines the park staff was following called for a killing shot to the brain...Since that shot was not delivered, how long the bear lingered before dying is something only those on site can say.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.