
The General Store at Stovepipe Wells in Death Valley National Park is a concessionaire-run operation/David and Kay Scott
Many travelers (readers of the Traveler excepted) mistakenly believe commercial facilities in the national parks – lodging, dining, and retail - are operated by the federal government.
While national park officials have ultimate oversight on things such as pricing, these facilities are operated by private companies that bid for the right to rent rooms, operate dining facilities, sell T-shirts, and offer specified activities such as trail rides and guided tours. NPS rangers continue to staff visitor centers and offer interpretive activities, but nearly all commercial activities are handled by the private sector.
Not all facilities most of us consider being in the national parks are actually in the parks. Several lodges, including Glacier Park Lodge, Apgar Village Lodge (both at Glacier National Park), Stehekin Valley Ranch (North Cascades National Park), Dornan’s Spur Ranch Cabins (Grand Teton National Park), and three of four lodges in Death Valley are privately owned and not subject to national park oversight. Room rates and food prices at these facilities do not have to be approved by the National Park Service.
Concessionaires for decades benefited from sweetheart deals that offered little revenue to the national parks. Yosemite Park and Curry Company operated in Yosemite for nearly a hundred years before the right to handle the park’s lodging and food service was turned over to Delaware North, a company that at the time owned dog tracks and the Boston Garden, but had no experience in the national parks. The corporation has since become a major player as a national park concessionaire.
Due in part to insufficient funding by the federal government, national parks have become more aggressive in squeezing concessionaires for a greater share of concession revenues. Parks are also requiring concessionaires to spend more of their own money for improvements and new buildings. In some instances, a concessionaire that spends a large amount of money on a capital project such as new cabins gains a leasehold interest (similar to a share of ownership, although it can’t be retained if a new concessionaire is selected) in the property that is gradually depreciated during its projected life. If the investing concessionaire loses a renewal of the contract to another company, any remaining leasehold interest is recouped, either from the new concessionaire or the NPS.
Xanterra Parks & Resorts, a private company that for many years had served as the primary concessionaire in Yellowstone National Park, in 2013 won a contract to operate business facilities in the park for an additional 20 years. The length was double that of most contracts, in large part because the Yellowstone contract required a large investment on the part of concessionaire. It also offered a different road to investment recovery. Xanterra spent nearly $90 million of its own money constructing five lodge buildings in the park’s Canyon area. As compensation, NPS permitted Xanterra additional flexibility in pricing a portion of guest rooms in Canyon, Old Faithful Inn, and Lake Hotel.
Companies interested in major NPS concessions are required to win the business through a bidding process. When an existing contract is nearing expiration, the National Park Service releases a prospectus listing its minimum requirements for winning a new contract. A prospectus for lodging and/or food service might require a major renovation or construction of a new building. The prospectus is also likely to require the winning bidder to take care of needed maintenance and fork over to NPS a minimum percentage of revenues generated.

Red jammers at Glacier National Park are operated by Xanterra Parks & Resorts/David and Kay Scott
NPS will sometimes package multiple concessions in a single prospectus in an effort to entice bidders to take on a facility that is likely to be unprofitable. In 2017, the NPS issued a prospectus that packaged visitor services in Oregon Caves National Monument with those of Crater Lake National Park. Crater Lake is generally considered a desirable concession (despite its short season and small dining room) that includes a classic park lodge that is typically filled to capacity. The lodge at Oregon Caves has only 23 guest rooms and is in a relatively isolated location making it less desirable from a business standpoint for concessionaires hoping to make a profit. It seems unlikely Oregon Caves alone would have attracted any bidders. The contract was won by Aramark Parks and Destinations, which most likely took on visitor services in the monument in order to win the right to operate the concession at Crater Lake. We should mention that we have enjoyed each of our stays in the Oregon Caves chateau, a unique and interesting lodging facility.
The currently outstanding NPS prospectus for operating lodging and food service at the North Rim of the Grand Canyon requires the winning bidder to spend in excess of $6 million renovating employee dorms, revamping the main lodge registration area, and making major changes to the two motel buildings. It also requires the concessionaire to remit to NPS at least 10 percent of the revenue it generates. A bidder may feel it needs to offer NPS even more than the minimum franchise fee stipulated in the prospectus in order to win the contract. For example, it may offer a fee of 12 percent rather than 10 percent in its proposal submitted to NPS.

The high expense of operating lodges and dining rooms on the South Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, including the elegant and opulent El Tovar, led the National Park Service to break the concessions contract in two/NPS, Michael Quinn
If potential bidders feel prospectus requirements are too onerous to be able to make a profit, NPS may fail to receive any bids and thereby be forced to revise the requirements downward. For example, it may delete or delay a construction project or reduce the franchise fee. NPS unsuccessfully attempted several times to entice bidders to assume the concession operations at Bluffs Lodge and Rocky Knob Cabins on the Blue Ridge Parkway. Due to the small number of guest rooms available and expense involved in required renovations, no bidders were forthcoming and both facilities have been closed for several years.
As NPS prospectuses have become more complex, potential bidders have found it increasingly expensive to prepare and submit a proposal that is likely to require many hours of labor and may entail the expense of employing a consultant. As a result, nearly all major national park concessions are now held by a few large companies that can afford the time expense, along with employing knowledgeable people who can evaluate a prospectus and determine whether it is worthwhile to enter a bid. The emergence of a limited number of businesses controlling the concessions, along with the competitiveness of these companies, will be the subject of our next column.
David and Kay Scott are authors of “Complete Guide to the National Park Lodges” (Globe Pequot Press). Visit them at mypages.valdosta.edu/dlscott/Scott.html.
Comments
Here is what the Yosemite contract and as far as I know all NPS contracts with concessioners require:
"The following notice must be prominently psoted at all Concessioner cash registers and payment areas:
"This service is operated by (Concession Name) a Concessioner under contract with the U.S. Government and administrated by the National Park Service. The Concessioner is responsible for conducting these operations in a satisfactory manner. Prices are approved by the Service."
Please address comments to:
Superintendent
Yosemite National Park
PO Box 577
Yosemite, CA 95389" Page B-20
Have you ever seen a notice like that at any NPS Concession?
Regarding the speculation in this article about the concessions for the Crater Lake Lodge and Oregon Caves Chateau being bundled in order to attract a concessionaire for the less-profitable Caves facility- you should know that a local non-profit (The Caves Junction Community Develpment Corporation) took on the concession nearly twenty years ago when the previous concessionaire walked out mid-contract, in order to prevent the loss of local jobs. By all accounts they did a fabulous job, and were prepared to do so indefinitely, but were shut out of the last bidding process by the Fed decision to bundle the two facilities- the local non-profit is in no position to operate a second facilitiy well over a hundred miles away. The contract went to Aramark, and more unpleasantness has happened to much of the historic furniture and building fabric, etc., as a result for those interested in doing the research- another non-profit had to step in and save what they could.
When is the concession contract up for STOVEPIPE WELLS in Death Valley National Park? Will the public know when different companies bid on that location?