You are here

National Parks 101: Who Runs The Lodges And Dining Establishments?

Share

Published Date

February 27, 2019

The General Store at Stovepipe Wells in Death Valley National Park/David and Kay Scott

The General Store at Stovepipe Wells in Death Valley National Park is a concessionaire-run operation/David and Kay Scott

Many travelers (readers of the Traveler excepted) mistakenly believe commercial facilities in the national parks – lodging, dining, and retail - are operated by the federal government. 

While national park officials have ultimate oversight on things such as pricing, these facilities are operated by private companies that bid for the right to rent rooms, operate dining facilities, sell T-shirts, and offer specified activities such as trail rides and guided tours. NPS rangers continue to staff visitor centers and offer interpretive activities, but nearly all commercial activities are handled by the private sector.

Not all facilities most of us consider being in the national parks are actually in the parks. Several lodges, including Glacier Park Lodge, Apgar Village Lodge (both at Glacier National Park), Stehekin Valley Ranch (North Cascades National Park), Dornan’s Spur Ranch Cabins (Grand Teton National Park), and three of four lodges in Death Valley are privately owned and not subject to national park oversight. Room rates and food prices at these facilities do not have to be approved by the National Park Service.

Concessionaires for decades benefited from sweetheart deals that offered little revenue to the national parks. Yosemite Park and Curry Company operated in Yosemite for nearly a hundred years before the right to handle the park’s lodging and food service was turned over to Delaware North, a company that at the time owned dog tracks and the Boston Garden, but had no experience in the national parks. The corporation has since become a major player as a national park concessionaire.

Due in part to insufficient funding by the federal government, national parks have become more aggressive in squeezing concessionaires for a greater share of concession revenues. Parks are also requiring concessionaires to spend more of their own money for improvements and new buildings. In some instances, a concessionaire that spends a large amount of money on a capital project such as new cabins gains a leasehold interest (similar to a share of ownership, although it can’t be retained if a new concessionaire is selected) in the property that is gradually depreciated during its projected life. If the investing concessionaire loses a renewal of the contract to another company, any remaining leasehold interest is recouped, either from the new concessionaire or the NPS.

Xanterra Parks & Resorts, a private company that for many years had served as the primary concessionaire in Yellowstone National Park, in 2013 won a contract to operate business facilities in the park for an additional 20 years. The length was double that of most contracts, in large part because the Yellowstone contract required a large investment on the part of concessionaire. It also offered a different road to investment recovery. Xanterra spent nearly $90 million of its own money constructing five lodge buildings in the park’s Canyon area. As compensation, NPS permitted Xanterra additional flexibility in pricing a portion of guest rooms in Canyon, Old Faithful Inn, and Lake Hotel. 

Companies interested in major NPS concessions are required to win the business through a bidding process. When an existing contract is nearing expiration, the National Park Service releases a prospectus listing its minimum requirements for winning a new contract. A prospectus for lodging and/or food service might require a major renovation or construction of a new building. The prospectus is also likely to require the winning bidder to take care of needed maintenance and fork over to NPS a minimum percentage of revenues generated.

Red jammers at Glacier National Park are operated by Xanterra Parks & Resorts/David and Kay Scott

Red jammers at Glacier National Park are operated by Xanterra Parks & Resorts/David and Kay Scott

NPS will sometimes package multiple concessions in a single prospectus in an effort to entice bidders to take on a facility that is likely to be unprofitable. In 2017, the NPS issued a prospectus that packaged visitor services in Oregon Caves National Monument with those of Crater Lake National Park. Crater Lake is generally considered a desirable concession (despite its short season and small dining room) that includes a classic park lodge that is typically filled to capacity. The lodge at Oregon Caves has only 23 guest rooms and is in a relatively isolated location making it less desirable from a business standpoint for concessionaires hoping to make a profit. It seems unlikely Oregon Caves alone would have attracted any bidders. The contract was won by Aramark Parks and Destinations, which most likely took on visitor services in the monument in order to win the right to operate the concession at Crater Lake. We should mention that we have enjoyed each of our stays in the Oregon Caves chateau, a unique and interesting lodging facility.

The currently outstanding NPS prospectus for operating lodging and food service at the North Rim of the Grand Canyon requires the winning bidder to spend in excess of $6 million renovating employee dorms, revamping the main lodge registration area, and making major changes to the two motel buildings. It also requires the concessionaire to remit to NPS at least 10 percent of the revenue it generates.  A bidder may feel it needs to offer NPS even more than the minimum franchise fee stipulated in the prospectus in order to win the contract. For example, it may offer a fee of 12 percent rather than 10 percent in its proposal submitted to NPS.

El Tovar on the South Rim of Grand Canyon National Park/NPS, Michael Quinn

The high expense of operating lodges and dining rooms on the South Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, including the elegant and opulent El Tovar, led the National Park Service to break the concessions contract in two/NPS, Michael Quinn

If potential bidders feel prospectus requirements are too onerous to be able to make a profit, NPS may fail to receive any bids and thereby be forced to revise the requirements downward. For example, it may delete or delay a construction project or reduce the franchise fee. NPS unsuccessfully attempted several times to entice bidders to assume the concession operations at Bluffs Lodge and Rocky Knob Cabins on the Blue Ridge Parkway. Due to the small number of guest rooms available and expense involved in required renovations, no bidders were forthcoming and both facilities have been closed for several years.  

As NPS prospectuses have become more complex, potential bidders have found it increasingly expensive to prepare and submit a proposal that is likely to require many hours of labor and may entail the expense of employing a consultant.  As a result, nearly all major national park concessions are now held by a few large companies that can afford the time expense, along with employing knowledgeable people who can evaluate a prospectus and determine whether it is worthwhile to enter a bid. The emergence of a limited number of businesses controlling the concessions, along with the competitiveness of these companies, will be the subject of our next column.

David and Kay Scott are authors of “Complete Guide to the National Park Lodges” (Globe Pequot Press).  Visit them at mypages.valdosta.edu/dlscott/Scott.html.

Related Stories:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Here is what the Yosemite contract and as far as I know all NPS contracts with concessioners require:  

"The following notice must be prominently psoted at all Concessioner cash registers and payment areas:

"This service is operated by (Concession Name) a Concessioner under contract with the U.S. Government and administrated by the National Park Service. The Concessioner is responsible for conducting these operations in a satisfactory manner. Prices are approved by the Service."

Please address comments to:

Superintendent 

Yosemite National Park

PO Box 577

Yosemite, CA 95389"   Page B-20

 

Have you ever seen a notice like that at any NPS Concession? 


Regarding the speculation in this article about the concessions for the Crater Lake Lodge and Oregon Caves Chateau being bundled in order to attract a concessionaire for the less-profitable Caves facility- you should know that a local non-profit (The Caves Junction Community Develpment Corporation) took on the concession nearly twenty years ago when the previous concessionaire walked out mid-contract, in order to prevent the loss of local jobs. By all accounts they did a fabulous job, and were prepared to do so indefinitely, but were shut out of the last bidding process by the Fed decision to bundle the two facilities- the local non-profit is in no position to operate a second facilitiy well over a hundred miles away. The contract went to Aramark, and more unpleasantness has happened to much of the historic furniture and building fabric, etc., as a result for those interested in doing the research- another non-profit had to step in and save what they could.


When is the concession contract up for STOVEPIPE WELLS in Death Valley National Park? Will the public know when different companies bid on that location?


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.