Eco-tents at Flamingo are set up as duplexes.
Every now and then, as we peruse park websites, we come across something that causes us to raise an eyebrow. For instance, at Everglades National Park the cost to sleep in a tent at Flamingo is $150 a night.
It's certainly a nice tent, complete with queen-sized bed, a fan to keep the air moving, and mosquito netting. But...$150 a night?
What do you think, travelers? Is this a good deal, or overpriced?
There hadn't been any visitor lodging at Flamingo since 2005, when hurricanes Katrina and Wilma inflicted heavy damage to the motel units and cottages there. In 2009, the facilities were razed. While park officials came up with a plan to replace the lodge, that 2010 lodging proposal with its $78 million price tag was deemed too expensive by then-Park Service Director Jon Jarvis, especially in light of the park's history with storms and the short occupancy season (summer is too buggy for most Everglades visitors).
Two years later, in 2012, the park experimented with "eco-tents" that could be used for nightly stays. The next year, 2013, the Park Service issued a prospectus for lodging at Flamingo that called for construction of 24 cottages and the purchase of 20 relatively large tents. The winning bidder would be required to pay for installation of the infrastructure to support it all.
In 2017, Guest Services, Inc., reached agreement with the Park Service to return lodging to Flamingo. The contract required construction of 24 cottages and 20 eco-tents by December 2019, but authorized a total of 40 cottages and 40 eco-tents. Now, the cottages have yet to appear, but the eco-tents are in place.
The eco-tents come complete with bed, fan, and mosquito netting.
The use of eco-tents is another novel aspect taken by the Park Service at Everglades. With a well-known history of hurricanes passing through the Flamingo area, having an inexpensive structure that can easily and quickly be dismantled and taken out of the path of a storm can reduce maintenance costs while providing a relatively low-end lodging option for visitors.
Back in 2012-2013 when the park experimented with the eco-tent approach, it worked with a somewhat Spartan-looking model designed by the University of Miami architecture program that could sleep four and came with a table and chairs as well as a picnic table and fire ring. The nightly cost? A mere $30. Restroom and shower facilities were a short walk away at the nearby campground.
Well, today, the restroom and shower facilities remain a short walk from the tents, but the $150 nightly fee does not exactly convey "low-end lodging," does it?
Here at the Traveler we're going to try and get some answers for how that price point was established. In the meantime, do you think that is a reasonable price?
Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places
Comments
Sounds high, but we really know too little to make a reasoned judgement. What is NPS take? What does it cost to purchase and maintain the tents? What does it cost to service the units? Given this was a competitive bid process, hard to believe that the company is making an unconscionable profit.
The tents seem practical for the NPS, but not so much for a visitor. Not that staying in such a tent is bad, just that the price is a bit high. Also, I've lived in Florida and having only a fan will be ok during the cooler months, but I expect that tent will be a sauna in the summer months. There are portable A/C units that could make the tents more comfortable.
I remember visiting Flamingo in the summer of 2006. The Flamingo campground was free without any check-in requirements. Even with that I remember only seeing a single site being used.
The absolute nearest town to Flamino is an hour's drive away. That's going to raise the costs for absolutely everything. And then, there's only 20 tents - so there's very little economy of scale to be had either.
To y_p_w: I'm sure that would be the case in the summer. The article doesn't say, but I presume the $150 price must certainly be the peak-season rate over the winter, possibly even over spring break.
Way too high even with a Senior Pass which would (prresumably) reduce the nightly fee to $75. I can't imagine that erecting and maintaining these tents would be all that much.
I don't beleive Golden Access will come into play here. This is a concession, not a NPS run campground. So no discounts. I do agree, too much for what you get.
The senior pass only applies to federal amenities such as campgrounds, boat launching, guided tours, etc. I don't think this is considered as such. I know some concessionaires operate campgrounds where an amentity discount would apply, but it wouldn't normally apply to "lodging" or concessionaire operated tours.
x