In a move that could be compared to swimming against the tide, an advocacy group in New Mexico is urging the state's U.S. senators not to push for rebranding of Bandelier National Monument as a "national park."
There have been a number of rebranding moves across the National Park System in recent years, turning Pinnacles National Monument, White Sands National Monument, the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial, and Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore into "national parks." A similar effort has been voiced for New River Gorge National River.
But the board of directors of Caldera Action, a nonprofit organization focused on protection, access, and education on National Park Service lands in the Jemez Mountains and associated public lands, this week voted unanimously to oppose a bill introduced in the Senate that would change Bandelier's designation.
Bandelier protects more than 33,000 acres of rugged but beautiful canyon and mesa country in northern New Mexico, as well as evidence of a human presence on the landscape going back over 11,000 years
A letter (attached below) sent Wednesday by the Caldera Action board to the senators argued that the national monument cannot bear additional crowds the rebranding would bring due to "inadequate and crumbling infrastructure and inadequate staffing."
The board also said the legislation would "open 4,300 acres of land within the monument that is fully protected now to hunting and trapping, taking wildlife management away from the National Park Service and giving it to the New Mexico Fish and Game Department."
"Currently, Bandelier lands are a refuge for a wide range of wildlife including beaver, bobcats, cougar, and other animals that face threats on most lands in the Jemez Mountains. We are opposed to all trapping on National Park Service lands in the Jemez Mountains," the letter read.
Caldera Action is calling on Congress to address severe funding shortfalls for the National Park Service at Bandelier and nationally before promoting National Park Service properties as economic development tourist attractions. Decaying and inadequate infrastructure, deficient staffing, staff housing shortages, and the delicacy of the cultural and natural features that attract the public, all argue for leaving Bandelier a National Monument, the group said.
The Senate bill directs the National Park Service to facilitate tribal cultural practices within the monument and to consult with tribes on National Park Service management actions. Bandelier staff has facilitated tribal cultural activities at Bandelier for decades and it already carries out detailed consultations with tribes over all substantial management actions at Bandelier.
The group maintained that rebranding Bandelier does not serve the interests of the American people, the National Park Service, or the natural and cultural resources of Bandelier National Monument.
Bandelier was designated a national monument under the Antiquities Act in 1916 to protect the significant cultural features of the area. Plundering of cultural artifacts in the Bandelier area helped inspire the passage of the Antiquities Act in 1906. Bandelier National Monument encompasses 33,677 acres of rugged volcanic plateau land. The monument adjoins the Valles Caldera National Preserve (also managed by the National Park Service) to the west, Los Alamos National Laboratory to the north, and a mix of tribal and National Forest lands on other boundaries.
Comments
Considering the damage Tru has done to national monuments already, be designated a national park by Congress is the only way to ensure any monumen is not reduced.
The most interesting aspect of the National Park dilemma is that the greatest strides were made by Buffalo Soldiers and the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC). I am quite amazed that no 21st Century President has developed a program similar to the CCC. The benefits to the general population of the CCC were amazing and our NPS units could certainly use the help.
Amen. I'm in Phoenix and the trails and buildings in the parks were laid by CCC and are still great.
There shouldn't be any discussion about this at all. Civilized society does not hunt, kill, abuse, pollute, neglect or abandon it's natural world and habitats. It's as simple as that.
The CCC program was greatt for the Parks and CCC workers, Who wouldn't want it? My guess would be the career NPS employees that have a vested interest in grwoing their jobs and agency by having more problems that need more money. Solving problems with the CCC s not the "Deep State" way of sucsess. The CCC did great trail work in Grand Teton NP. Some of their great trail work there has been abandoned by the NPS.
The fragile ecosystem and historic structures at the Monument would not be able to handle the influx of visitors redesignating to National Park would bring.
NO way that CCC sould ever be resurected again. The Trade Unions and Davis Bacon Act practitioners would have fit.
Yes, Yes, Yes, we need this as a National Park. The additional exposure will help raise the needed funds to make park improvements. Think ahead, not backwards.