Editor's note: This updates with reaction from the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, and the National Parks Conservation Association.
More than 2,000 Interior Department employees, including more than 500 at the National Park Service, have been infected with Covid-19 this year, according to a news report.
National Park Service and Interior officials have refused to discuss how extensive the spread of infection might be within their agencies. Interior has refused to respond to multiple Freedom of Information Act requests from the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks seeking information on the rate of infection within the Park Service.
At the Coalition, Phil Francis wasn't particularly surprised to learn of the high NPS count.
"We wish everyone and their families and friends the very best. Unfortunately, and especially in light of recent revelations about how the administration viewed the pandemic while meeting behind closed doors, it's more apparent than ever how little regard the (Interior) secretary has for those who work in Interior. January 20 cannot arrive soon enough," Francis told Traveler in an email.
"It's a shame how those who have see served the American people so well for so long are treated as pawns in the political process," he added. "We look forward to a new set of leaders who will be more concerned about the health and safety of their employees than the self-serving goals of a secretary and the administration."
Kristen Brengel at the National Parks Conservation Association said the toll of infections didn't have to happen.
“This whole pandemic has been botched by Interior,” she said, explaining that earlier this year the Interior Department insisted that park superintendents get letters from local health officials supporting a decision to close parks.
“We saw the emails from park staff that DOI wasn’t allowing Grand Canyon to close," said Brengel, NPCA's senior vice president for government affairs. "They’ve put superintendents in untenable positions. The superintendents have wanted to protect their staff and health and safety, and the Interior Department wasn’t allowing them to do it. They required letters from the superintendents, and not everyone could get one.”
“DOI made them jump through hoops to get local support for it," said Brengel. "When you have people’s lives in your hands, you don’t play politics with them.”
While Yellowstone National Park this year issued monthly tallies concerning infections among park and concession employees, other parks have not been as forthcoming.
Big Bend National Park in Texas did close temporarily in July after an employee was infected, though the park quietly reopened in August.
The Big Bend area has been viewed as one of the most vulnerable parts of the country due to the lack of medical facilities. The closest hospital to the park is 100 miles away in Alpine, Texas, and has just 25 beds.
According to E&E News, Interior's latest tally of Covid among its far-flung workforce shows that there have been 2,130 cases. Inside the Park Service, there have been 522 cases and one confirmed death, according to the report Friday afternoon. The Bureau of Indian Education reported the most deaths within Interior due to the disease, with eight.
This week Interior Secretary David Bernhardt reportedly contracted the disease.
National Park Service staff in Washington did not immediately respond Friday to a request for comment on the news report. However, a Park Service spokesperson told E&E News that "(U)se of our data to inform any outside studies or reporting could be misleading and is duplicative of data gathered from state and local health departments."
At Big Bend, Superintendent Bob Krumenaker had told Traveler that the lack of medical facilities is concerning, though there were no plans to close the park.
"Obviously, the things that we highlighted back in April that led to the first closure of the park, which had to do with the availability of medical care, now we are right on the cusp of being where we feared in April and had approval to close the park at that time," he said. "That has not changed. In fact, our contact with the local medical people (says) they're very worried."
Interestingly, said the superintendent, while Big Bend has seen heavy visitation this fall, those visitors don't seem to be bringing Covid with them.
"Even though our county and the surrounding counties are among the hottest counties in the country right now, there isn't much evidence, fortunately, that the visitors are bringing Covid here," said Krumenaker.
Many units of the National Park Service have reduced services or kept areas closed due to the pandemic this year. Just this month many national parks in California closed campgrounds, lodgings, and restaurants due to state orders issued in a bid to slow the spread of Covid.
Whether Big Bend is forced to close for a third time this year remains to be seen.
"We have been told by both region and Washington that if there are justifications for reducing services, they will consider them and they will try to support us," Krumenaker said. "The critical thing is we need to have facts and we need to justify it and we need to show mitigations we have considered and implemented. If we're at the end of that line and there's nothing else we can do other than cutback, I'm optimistic they will allow me to cutback."
Just this week, U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat who chairs the House Natural Resources Committee, urged President-elect Biden to extend his mask-wearing mandate, initially announced as applying to all federal buildings, to federally managed public lands as well.
Grijalva evidently had not been apprised of the Covid situation across Interior, as in his letter Tuesday to Biden he noted that "roughly 150 National Park Service employees tested positive for COVID-19 between March and September."
While Interior officials early this year were slow to approve some park closures due to Covid -- Grand Canyon National Park was the most notable case -- Grijalva hopes the Biden administration will rely on Park Service superintendents to make prudent decisions when it comes to battling the disease.
"It is also vital that your administration reinstate the authority for park superintendents to close sites or sections of parks in response to COVID-19 outbreaks and meaningfully consult with local communities regarding increased public access and COVID-19 risks," Grijalva said in his letter to the president-elect.
Comments
While it is understandable that many people don't like the current administration's environmental policies, it is clear that the author started with a conclusion that the DOI mgmt has been behaving in a negligent manner and jeopardizing employee safety. Then the author cherry-picked data to support that belief. Here's a little data analysis that leads to a different conclusion: 1) About 5% of the U.S. population have been infected with Covid (18million infected/330million citizens). However only about 2.5% of paid NPS employees have been infected ( 500 infected/23,000 paid employees). This data alone leads to a conclusion that the NPS is safety-minded. And, it doesn't factor into consideration the thousands of volunteer employees with the NPS....but, wait, there's more; 2) The article fails to show how many of these 500 Covid cases involving NPS employees are work-related (i.e- OWCP claims). I would venture to guess that only a fraction of those 500 cases are work-related. Perhaps the author could do a little more investigative journalism and do a follow-up article.
It would appear that it is Phil Francis, Kristen Brengel, the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, the National Parks Conservation Association and NPT who are using the parks and its employees as political pawns.
As for Covid, both political parties and the media should be ashamed with how they have handled this.
I think if you would talk to some of the superintendents and employees you'll find great concern about Covid-19 and how the Park Service can, or can't, protect its employees and park visitors.
As the email trail from Grand Canyon demonstrated, the health of the field employees was not always at the top of the priority list.
https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2020/03/update-3-interior-secretar...
Not sure what you're getting at when you say the media should be ashamed for its coverage of the worst global pandemic in more than 100 years, one that has killed more Americans than World War II. Are you referring to the media outlets that said Covid was a fraud, and that masks were useless, or that the vaccine shouldn't be taken?
I stand by Traveler's coverage. You can find all of it here:
https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/article-category/coronavirus?sort_...
No, Wild, YOUR political party and YOUR right-wing media should be ashamed with how THEY handled the pandemic. There's only one side of the political spectrum that downplayed how serious this pandemic was, and is. Please don't make yourself feel better by saying "both sides screwed up"; YOUR side screwed up. Period.
As always, Kurt, thank you for the spot-on reporting.
Really Brian? They screwed up when they were one of the first to shut the borders and Biden & Co yelled xenophobia? They screwed up when 2.2 million deaths were predicted by July and the total was less than 10% of that? They screwed up when we had the greatest mobilization since WWII? Not a single patient was denied a ventalator and emergency hospitals sat idle? They screwed up when Cuomo sent the elderly to nursing home death traps, Pelosi said go party in Chinatown and DeBlasio sent everyone to the bars? 8 of the top 10 state death rates per capita have Democratic governors who actually have primary responsiblity. There is no Constitutional delgated authority for the Federal government to take that role.
Really? What a bitter angry ball of nastyness masquerading as a commentary.
Really?
I have no doubt you are correct about the concerns some have Kurt. I also have no doubt that many are ignoring guidelines just like the general population.
Nor do I have any doubt that it really wouldn't matter what steps the President took as the Democrats, the nonprofits mentioned and the vast majority of the media would find fault. Just as Republicans will find fault with whatever steps Biden takes. The main difference will be in how it is reported.
As for the media, you cite good examples, again all from one side but there are an equal number of examples from the left. I was actually thinking of the childish behavior of both our President AND the Journalists back when he was giving his daily press briefings. It was like watching ill mannered 6 yr olds.
As for your World War 2 statistics, this is what I found and you may eventually be correct in looking at U.S. fatalities but we are not quite there yet and hopefully we never even come close to the global numbers.
WWII US ~405,000 Global 50-75 million (dependent on how you want to classify )
Covid US 317,000 Global 1.69 million (also needs validation)
As for Brian P, ecbuck did a decent job pointing out just a few of the failures of what I presume to be "your side" but there are many many others. I'll just encourage you to consider getting your information from more sources than you apparently are.
Merry Christmas to all.
And Wild, the 317,000 "COVID" death statistics are totally bogus as they include anyone infected as dying of COVID. The CO Grand County Coroner just came out exposing that 2 of the 5 deaths attribuded to her county were a murder - suicide and two more had COVID but that wasn't the primary cause of death. The casualties of WWII were healthy young men and womens with decades of life ahead of them. The majority of the COVID deaths already had one foot in the grave which is why the number of overall deaths at current rates are more likely to be down then up for the year even with 317,000+ "COVID deaths"