Your National Park Vacation Has Gotten More Expensive
By Lori Sonken
You’re not mistaken. A national park vacation is more expensive than it was 20 years ago. Considerably more expensive in some costs once you get to the entrance gate.
Not all units within the National Park System collect admission fees, but for those that do the cost to visit the taxpayers’ treasures has outpaced inflation – as much as sixfold - over the past two decades. But entrance fees weren’t alone in their increases, as the cost of camping, climbing lighthouse stairs, and even paddling a boat is also more expensive (see table below).
Based on data provided by the National Park Service and using the Consumer Price Index at the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to account for inflation, we reviewed park admission rates for individuals, vehicles, and annual passes from 2000 through today (see PDF attached below). Of the 126 park units surveyed, entrance fees increased above the rate of inflation (2.07 percent/year) at 83 parks.
The largest increase occurred at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in southern Utah and northern Arizona, where the vehicle entrance fee jumped 500 percent from $3 in 2000 to $30 today. During the same time period, the cost of an annual pass at Glen Canyon rose about 244 percent – from $10 to $55.
Records show a 400 percent uptick in entrance fees from $2 in 2000 to $15 in 2021 for individuals visiting Adams National Historical Park in Massachusetts, Colorado and Oregon Pipe Cactus national monuments in Colorado and Arizona, respectively, and Pinnacles National Park in California.
Slightly less, but still high, is the 316 percent price surge from $4 in 2020 to $25 today for automobile entrance fees at Lava Beds National Monument in California and the Wright Brothers National Memorial on the Outer Banks of North Carolina.
Fees increased 200 percent or more since 2000 at about 27 parks surveyed, including Golden Spike and Harpers Ferry national historic parks, Lake Mead National Recreation Area, and Saguaro National Park.
A survey of Traveler’s Facebook audience found a variety of opinions on the costs of a national park visit, from those who considered things getting too expensive to those who thought higher fees should be charged. Most thought entrance fees were reasonable, but a few took issue with the cost of lodging and quality of dining in the parks.
“The entrance fees are not the problem; they haven’t been raised in years. A totally different thing are the fees and costs charges by the concessionaires who deliver a very low level of service. The cost of lodging has tripled compared to the early 2000s, while the quality of service is even less basic than before,” wrote Frank Mußler, one of more than 100 people who voiced an opinion. “The fees should be far higher for groups and less for individual families. For foreigners who pay several thousand dollars to visit the national parks for just a few hours 10-20 $ per visit more wouldn’t affect the overall cost. Yet the extra income would benefit the parks and make them less dependent on Congress I say that as a German visitor btw.”
But Paul O’Donnell thought entrance fees should be done away with.
“Entrance fees are viewed as a way to provide funding, they shouldn't be. The parks could easily be funded adequately by Congress but haven't been because people haven't demanded it,” wrote O’Donnell. “Entrance fees keep people out of the parks. National parks are the collective heritage of ALL citizens not just those with $25 to drop at a moment’s notice. On the Roosevelt Arch (at the North Entrance to Yellowstone National Park) it doesn't say ‘for the benefit and enjoyment of the rich’ does it? Entrance fees are a symptom of the problem and should be removed.”
Juliann Hanna Murphy agreed.
“The parks should be publicly funded. I worked at the gate of a park one season and it broke my heart to have to turn someone away because they couldn't afford the entrance fee. That is just wrong,” she wrote.
Some took pride in purchasing a park pass.
“I bought an annual pass this year to support the NPS historic site where I walk daily. While they said I could come in for free if I just wanted to use the restroom, I feel proud to show my annual pass card when I enter,” wrote Wendy Bumgardner. “I have always donated in the past at the donation barrel, but as the visitors center was closed much of last year, I couldn't. I know those fees help keep the site clean and maintained and a safe place to walk and enjoy.”
Not all parks increased their fees since 2000; we found 43 parks once charged fees, including John Muir National Historic Site in California, Fort Laramie National Historic Site in Wyoming, and Harry S Truman National Historic Site in Missouri, but no longer do because of the costs of doing so.
“Park Service officials told us they used to charge entrance fees but stopped in 2011 due to the costs of collecting these fees. After the park stopped charging entrance fees, visitation increased by 30 percent,” at the John Muir National Historic Site, the Government Accountability Office noted in its 2015 report, Revenues from Fees and Donations Increased, but some Enhancements are Needed to Continue this Trend.
Some units, such as Point Reyes National Seashore in California and Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Tennessee and North Carolina are prohibited by statute from charging fees. Similarly, children under 16 are admitted to all parks at no cost.
Better-known national parks, such as Yellowstone, Yosemite, Zion, Grand Canyon, and Grand Teton, increased individual entrance fees and the cost of annual passes about 25 percent and 13 percent, respectively, from 2000 to today.
Park visits fluctuate by year and were down last year due to the pandemic. Recreation fee revenues are a relatively small part of NPS’s approximately $4 billion annual budget. In 2020, the NPS received about $249 million in recreation fee revenues, said Kathy Kupper, NPS public affairs specialist.
National park units keep at least 80 percent of the revenues collected at their sites, and the remaining 20 percent benefits parks without fees. Funds may be used for facility maintenance, repair, and enhancement; interpretation and visitor services; law enforcement; and certain habitat restoration efforts. Revenues also support the reservation- and permit-obtaining- platform, Recreation.gov.
“National park entrance and recreation fees are an important source of funding to not only address maintenance needs, but also to help support education services, provide law enforcement and improve visitor experiences. However, we should not increase fees to such a degree as to make these places – protected for all Americans to experience – unaffordable for some families to visit,“ said Emily Douce, director of operations and park funding for the National Parks Conservation Association, in an email.
Efforts to increase park fees have been attempted many times over the years. At times some members of Congress argued for free entrance, reflecting the view that the American public pays for its parks through their taxes. Others have supported fees as a way to supplant Congressional appropriations.
“This is how politics makes interesting bedfellows,” said Rick Healy, who worked on parks issues as a senior Democratic staff member for more than 25 years in the House of Representatives, including 18 years as Democratic staff director of the House National Parks Subcommittee.
When the Reagan Administration proposed to increase fees at Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks, then-Congressman Richard Cheney (R-Wyo.) was concerned about a loss in tourism revenues. As Republican whip, Cheney played a key role in rounding up Republican votes to support the reauthorization of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, including modifications to the recreation fee program that at the time funded land acquisitions, said Healy.
At Cheney’s request “we included language in the bill capping the vehicle fee at $10 or $5 for a person not in a vehicle for Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks and an entrance fee paid at one of these two parks was also good for admittance to the other one,” said Healy in an email.
That shared pass, however, disappeared on June 1, 2015, when the Park Service set a $30 entrance fee for Yellowstone and a $30 entrance fee for Grand Teton.
Today, there is an established process, including the requirement to notice the proposed rate in the Federal Register, for parks without fees to establish them. But parks with current fees can charge “whatever they can get away with,” said Healy.
NPCA supports having the NPS or an outside entity study the “barriers to visiting parks for people of all income levels,” said Douce. In addition, prior to a rate increase NPCA believes continued extensive outreach to the public should occur.
“More targeted public meetings and active outreach in communities beyond current electronic public comments would help to reach a more diverse set of opinions and thoughts about the impacts of entrance fees.” she said.
In 2017, the Trump administration proposed to raise the entrance fees two-to-threefold at the country’s most popular parks as a way to raise funds to address the repair backlog. Stymied by public opposition, the Interior Department opted instead to phase in modest increases – about $5 per admittance at the parks charging entrance fees.
Also of concern to consumers is the cost of spending a night in a park lodge or dining in a restaurant. A study of 2019 lodging rates compared to those charged in 1999 by David and Kay Scott, Traveler’s lodging experts, found, on average, that they reflected an annual compounded increase of 4.23 percent compared with an annual increase of 2.17 percent in the Consumer Price Index. Based on our sample of 34 lodges, national park lodging room rates have been increasing at approximately twice as much as the Consumer Price Index, they noted.
The largest percentage price increase the Scotts found -- more than 250 percent -- was a tent cabin in Yosemite National Park’s Half Dome Village that rose from $40 in 1999 to $141 in 2019. This represents an annual compound growth rate of 6.5 percent, or three times the annual increase in consumer prices. The smallest price increase was at Kettle Falls Hotel in Voyageurs National Park in Minnesota, where over two decades room prices increased only 3.8 percent, from $65 in 1999 to $90 in 2019. This represents an annual compound price increase of 1.64 percent. Rooms at the hotel do not have a private bath.
Issues with lodging and dining costs were cited by some of Traveler’s Facebook followers.
“Entrance and most amenity fees are good. But lodging and food is out of reach and keeps going higher,” wrote Cyn Collyard. “Concessionaires keep raising prices but not repairing or replacing - falls to NPS. Lodging is pricing out normal families. Glacier McDonald at over $400 a night!!!!!”
Rebecca Colip wrote that “entrance fees are not a problem. I do think the hotel fees have risen in recent years to the point where it is difficult for a family to afford to stay in the park.”
“Absolutely agree,” replied Pat Bohannan. “The average hotel room rate in Yellowstone these days is around $350 per night. That’s insane.”
“Food could definitely be of better quality at the cafeterias,” added Kay Robinett.
Robert Winfree was of the opinion that “(R)esource management costs should be covered by appropriations, as for other federal lands. Convenience services costs should be high enough to cover basic operations and maintenance, as for private resorts. Peak season pricing should be higher than shoulder and off-season. Costs for extraordinary rescues should be charged to visitors, who should be advised to carry trip/medivac insurance. Annual and lifetime (age/access) passes are a great idea.”
But there are a handful of days each year when you can get a break on park entrance fees.
This year, the NPS is waiving entrance fees on six days; they are April 17, the first day of National Park Week; Veterans Day, November 11; National Public Lands Day, September 25; the one-year anniversary of the passage of the Great American Outdoors Act, August 4; and Martin Luther King Jr.’s Birthday, January 18. No longer is August 25, recognized as National Park Service Founder's Day, included in this group.
Additionally, fourth graders are eligible for a pass that entitles them and their families to visit parks for free for one year. For the remainder of the current school year, fifth graders and their families can enjoy parks at no cost as well, since many missed out on using their pass last year due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Select Fee Increases In The National Park System | |
---|---|
The cost of a lifetime Senior Pass... | ...went from $10 to $80 in 2017. |
Yellowstone fishing permit fees... | ...are increasing from $18 to $40 for a three-day permit this year. |
Glen Canyon NRA charges... | ...you $30 to launch your boat, whether it's a cabin cruiser or kayak. |
Getting married in Grand Teton National Park got more expensive... | ...in 2019 when it jumped $75 to $200 for a wedding permit. |
It costs $10 for a ranger-led tour of Rapidan Camp at Shenandoah National Park... | ...the same amount as you'll be charged to tour FDR's home at Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site. |
An off-road vehicle permit to drive the beaches at Cape Hatteras National Seashore... | ...costs $50 for ten consecutive days, or $120 for an annual permit. |
Support National Parks Traveler
National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures.
EIN: 26-2378789
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
Comments
"Entrance fees keep people out of the parks." Got any evidence whatsoever to support that? Nobody drives 3 days to get there and then turns around when they get hit for a $35 entrance fee.
Too many people want some one else to pay for their vacation, their college education, their health care and how much else. But they've got no problem paying $5 for a coffee every day.
In 2021 it costs a family of 4 $35 to enter Yellowstone for a week. By comparison:
1 day lift ticket for 1 person @ Vail: $199 (that's $5K+ for a family of 4 for a week)
1 day ticket for 1 person @ Disney: $109 (that's $2K+ for a family of 4 for a week)
1 day pass for 1 person @ Kennedy Space Center: $57 (that's $1K+ for a week)
Want to compare lodging costs @ Vail or Disney to NPS concessionaires?
"But parks with current fees can charge "whatever they can get away with," said Healy. This is not correct. Even fee increases must go through public comment.
It would be interesting to hear from a NPS spokesman as to what they attribute this to.
Agree 100% with you Loui. It makes absolute sense that the people that are enjoying the Parks be the people footing a good part of the bill. And even at that its a bargain compared to other vacation alternatives. Pricing people out of the Parks? Sound like a paraphrased Yogi Berra saying. "Nobody goes there anymore - its too crowded - because it is so expensive."
I can't figure out how the author did her calculations of percentage increases. Just about all of them are under-stated.
Glen Canyon: $3 >>> $30 is $27, a 900% increase, not 500
Glen Canyon: $10 >>> $55 is $45, a 450% increase, not 244
Adams NHP, etc.: $2 >>> $15 is $13, a 650% increase, not 400
Lava Beds: $4 >>> $25 is $21, a 525% increase, not 316
Vehicle entrance to Yosemite in 2000 was $20, now it's $35, an increase of $15. That's a 75% increase, not 25
Individual entrance to Yosemite in 2000 was $10, now it's $20, an increase of $10. That's a 100% increase, not 25
"Half Dome Village"--it's actually been named back to Camp Curry for almost 2 years now--was $40, now $141, an increase of $101, is the only correct calculation at just above 250%.
Dan, thanks for your question. I used the Consumer Price Index to adjust for inflation. So, the $3 entrance fee at Glen Canyon in 2000 is equal to $5 today. This is a 500 percent increase over what was charged.
So many of us keep desperately trying to blame the National Park Service, immigrants, welfare moms, civil rights, and whatever the next guy might want in terms of amenities for constantly rising park visit costs. But, the truth is a whole lot simpler. Wages have, in terms of real buying power, stayed pretty close to stagnant for the vast majority of Americans while the wealth of those at the top has skyrocketed and the balancing effect of progessive taxation has lagged far behind. What this massive amount of unchecked economic stratification has meant is that there is massively more money in the system driving inflation; but, a drastically reduced share of it has reached the average working person. As a result, the cost of practically everything has risen due to the inflation; but, the ability of the average working person to afford it has dropped far behind.
This is an economic structural problem that so many of the puffed up delusional blowhards in our society just refuse to acknowledge and it's only going to get worse, regardless of what the NPS does or does not try to do, until either those blowhards grow up, which is highly unlikely, or we stop listening to them and choose to reinstate the balancing effect of progessive taxation over their delusional objections.
Regardless of the total costs, entrance fees do factor into whether or not people show up. I've seen that with free days at many local museums where people will line up for 2 hours when a typical day is 10 minutes. We get massive visitation on NPS free days.
I was at an NPS site in Hawaii where there was nobody to collect the $3 fee. Obviously that wasn't a very good use of resources to have anyone paid to collect just a few bucks when their visitation was typically light. I have seen a few places with automated fee kiosks.