You are here

National Park Service Sued Over Cumberland Island National Seashore's Feral Horses

Share

The National Park Service is being sued over the condition of feral horses at Cumberland Island National Seashore/NPS file

Cumberland Island National Seashore's feral horses not only are damaging the seashore's environment and two federally protected species but are not being humanely managed by the National Park Service and should be removed from the seashore, according to a lawsuit filed against the federal government.

The 65-page filing (attached below), which names Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and Park Service officials among the defendants, alleges that the island's horses have suffered for at least a quarter-century because of Park Service neglect. During the same period, the defendants were aware of the negative impacts the horses were having on the environment.

"NPS and the State have inadequately managed and failed to remove the Island’s feral horses by knowingly ignoring the laws, policies, rules, and regulations put in place to protect the Cumberland Island National Seashore and its resources," the lawsuit, filed last week, claims. "Defendants’ failure to fulfill their collective obligations has inflicted serious harm to Cumberland’s horses, requiring their removal from the Island, and has permitted the horses, in the natural course of their existence, to inflict serious harm to the Island’s natural and wilderness resources."

The lawsuit was brought by the Georgia Equine Rescue League Ltd., the Georgia Horse Council Inc., Center for Biological Diversity Southeast Director Will Harlan, Cumberland Island resident Carol Ruckdeschel, and even the horses themselves, a listing the plaintiffs maintain is allowed by previous court rulings that have recognized wildlife as plaintiffs.

Seashore Superintendent Gary Ingram maintains the horses are not suffering. In an email to the Traveler earlier this month the superintendent wrote that, "[T]he National Park Service has monitored the horses on Cumberland Island National Seashore annually with population census techniques since 1981. Condition ratings for observed animals have been predominantly in the 'good' to 'moderate' categories. At no time during the last 41+ years have there been findings indicating that the overall health of the herd was in extremely poor condition."

Though the Park Service notes that the presence of horses on the island date to the 1700s, the lawsuit contends that the animals "face hardships as ecological strangers to the barrier island ecosystem."

"The fillies breed from their first heat and remain periodically pregnant their entire lives, forcing them to forage for their nursing baby, the foal they carry, and themselves," the lawsuit maintains. "This burden, together with the island’s lack of adequate food sources, is reflected in body scores."

The horses struggle to survive in the seashore's challenging setting, the lawsuit stated, claiming that "[T]he island’s harsh environmental factors reduce the life expectancy of the Island’s horses to approximately one-third of that of a domestic horse."

The filing also maintained that the Park Service was failing to preserve the seashore's environment by allowing the horses to remain on Cumberland Island. While Ingram did not address the Traveler's questions about the 150 or so horses' impact on the seashore's environment, a Park Service report from 2018 cited concerns about those impacts:

Studies of horse impacts at CUIS have found that grazing activity, including vegetation consumption and trampling, significantly reduces vegetative cover, growth, and reproduction in these habitats (Turner 1986, Dolan 2002). Grazing also appears to be altering plant species composition and is likely increasing the vulnerability of dunes and salt marshes to erosion and storm damage (Turner 1986, Dolan 2002). In addition to impacts on vegetation, feral horses compact wetland soils, altering soil properties (e.g., infiltration rates) and disturbing vital soil-dwelling organisms (Noon and Martin 2004). The wastes produced by horses contribute to nutrient enrichment or eutrophication of wetlands and waterbodies, and can contaminate waters with pathogens, including E. coli bacteria (Noon and Martin 2004). Together, these impacts make wetland habitats less favorable for native plants, fish, herpetofauna, and invertebrates. 

The report also noted that, "during a 2004 visit to CUIS, NPS Water Resource Division staff concluded that, 'maintenance of the feral horse herd causes unacceptable impacts to the park’s wetland resources."

The Park Service's neglect of these conditions is a violation of the National Park Service Organic Act, and constitutes an arbitrary and capricious action and an abuse of discretion, the filing argues. The horses also pose a threat to the seashore's wilderness, and "[P]ermitting feral horses to exist within the Cumberland Island Wilderness is directly contrary to NPS’s duty to assure the 'natural conditions' wilderness characteristic required by the Wilderness Act."

Furthermore, the agency's failure to remove the horses is a violation of the Endangered Species Act, as the horses intrude on critical habitat of the loggerhead sea turtle, which is considered an endangered species under the act, interfere with nesting females, and trample hatchlings and eggs. Critical habitat for the piping plover, another protected species, also is being impaired by the horses, the lawsuit contends.

The lawsuit asks that the Park Service immediately remove the horses from the national seashore "pending the issuance of a Categorical Exclusion, or if necessary, an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement, all in compliance with the National Environmental Protection Act," and prohibit the agency from allowing horses into official and potential wilderness on Cumberland Island.

Additional Traveler stories about the seashore's horses:

The Trouble With Horses On Cumberland Island

Cumberland Island Expansion: Putting the Cart Before the Horses

Cumberland Island's Horses Out Of The Past

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

Support Journalism about National Parks!

National Parks Traveler is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

They have been there since the 1700's, and now you want them o all be removed?  How about culling to herd to half the number? Is there a monetary motive in this law suit?


My concern is if they are successful, next they'll go after the Chincoteague ponies, which A) seem far more adapted to their island life, B) are successfully managed on Assateague Island, and C) are speciallized enough that they are recognized as their own breed of horse/pony.


Please save them 


Perhaps Cumberland Island resident Carol Ruckdeschel and any of the otherr plaintiffs should be removed from Cumberland for their disruption of the environment? What a stupid and deceitful lawsuit.


My concerns have to do with HUMANS as they seem to continue to think that they can control & eliminate every problem that occurs with non-humans anywhere.  This is the first time that this issue with these Majestic Horses have been brought to my attention....As difficult as it is for human beings to admit, all life forms have similar ways of being.....All wish not to be harmed and instinctively would prefer freedom to what is often tragically done to them.   Our worry is that the decision to remove these Horses will only bring misery.  The misery is frankly Slaughter!...This is what our specie believes it has justification to do to the innocent when it finds no alternative....Horses as well as other species relate to one another as we do, therefore You would be splitting them up because you do not understand this aspect of behavior and connection amongst them.  Before you begin to harm them, please utilize concrete and critical thinking in this serious matter in order to arrive at a conclusion.  I hope to hear further about this.  Thank you


If the horses are degrading the ecology of the park, they should be humanely removed or at least reduced in number.


What about relocating them to Payne's Prairie in Florida,  a marshy land with wild horses in Florida south of Gainesville?    


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.